the method to beat the roulette

[nichedelico]

Hello, i'm here for the last time for saying Outsider is right. No doubts. Here a single graph of many like this.
Bye.

[outsider]

Hello, i'm here for the last time for saying Outsider is right. No doubts. Here a single graph of many like this.
Bye.

I had never seen my method on a chart before, i must say that is a pretty clear line hahaha (not an ECG).

[Serendipity]

If this is true, it is definitely a HG and roulette can be beaten.
Do you bet every spin, or are there inside or outside bets?

[outsider]

If this is true, it is definitely a HG and roulette can be beaten.
Do you bet every spin, or are there inside or outside bets?

someone explained to me the meaning of this "HG" and i find it a bit silly... it's not much of a deal, i mean... people don't realize that with the right knowledges it's something  doable (beating the roulette)... it's just that most (99.99...%) of the times, who has the right knowledges, doesn't come in a forum.
So I'm an anomaly.
This Holy grail thing is just a forum word for people that sails in the dark.

However, sorry for the digression... to answer to your question, NO, i don't bet every spin... you can see it also in the chart.

[outsider]

i just want to say that since it's getting to much hard to follow everyone... i will take just one more person.

[Person S]

free entry?

[outsider]

free entry?

no, the terms are in the first comment.

[Roulettebeater]

If your systems wins you wouldn’t need all these things but of course you are trying to make money by selling .

[outsider]

If your systems wins you wouldn’t need all these things but of course you are trying to make money by selling .

Well, i would say, “i’m making...” not trying!
Why? Because i’m giving true knowledge that you will not find in a (english) forum niether in 100 years...

[game over]

Has anyone on this forum paid this man?
If the answer is affirmative, please send me a private message, I have also paid and I want to know something.
Thank you

[Austria]

Sent a PM to a good friend.

I think that is of interest to all Members.
Ignatus has already written a very good system in RX code.    Marigny-System v1.dgt
I recommend it to everyone to try it out. And it's FREE. 

[Austria]

SORRY....................... Here the link...link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26030.msg227810#msg227810

[outsider]

Sent a PM to a good friend.

I think that is of interest to all Members.
Ignatus has already written a very good system in RX code.    Marigny-System v1.dgt
I recommend it to everyone to try it out. And it's FREE. 

The raw Marigny has too many limitations and errors in the calculations... even though it remains the only sensible and decent known approach.

[Austria]

Yes ... I've had the book since the days when PCs were still unaffordable and the C = 64 was commonplace in the living room. The title of the book was, in German to English: One piece per attack. 

Although the heading: Systems, Products & Services For Sale for such
Offers made, I can only shake my head when such
Price expectations are published. 

I've only had this in my previous casino gamblings
RouletteXtreme system designer bought. That was the best.....

Everyone can implement his concept relatively easily with the basic interpreter, or even try it out on hundreds of them in this forum.

At around 10 EUR a day, that's 3650 EUR annually ... which I certainly won't invest with you. 

[outsider]

Yes ... I've had the book since the days when PCs were still unaffordable and the C = 64 was commonplace in the living room. The title of the book was, in German to English: One piece per attack. 

Although the heading: Systems, Products & Services For Sale for such
Offers made, I can only shake my head when such
Price expectations are published. 

I've only had this in my previous casino gamblings
RouletteXtreme system designer bought. That was the best.....

As long as you are aware of the Marigny's validity, you have not wasted your time in this field.

Everyone can implement his concept relatively easily with the basic interpreter, or even try it out on hundreds of them in this forum.

Everyone can do it... in theory, because is required the ability to understand and put all things togheter... also the book is not easy to find... not to mention the language barrier that can be a deterrent to not be able to not have such knowledges.
It's hard to overcome all these things by yourserlf, if you had a basic approach until now. Marigny's style isn't the easist one to learn.
That's why i stepped in (and also because the basic marigny has too many limitations and approximations for me, like the fact that the zero is not calculated at all).

At around 10 EUR a day, that's 3650 EUR annually ... which I certainly won't invest with you. 

If you have already mastered the basic method and you are enough satisfied, i don't see any reason to come to me.
His original book name was something like  "Le gain scientifique d'une seule unité", i never saw it outside of french language... so i fortunately learn it in a different and more mathematic way.
Do you believe me if i say that there are insolent people, which thinks that this is not a valid approach?