Roulette Simulator - Method Testing

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

7 and 14 for example are both mapped to the same pigeonhole?

[Person S]

0-37
1-36
2-35
3-34
4-33
5-32
6-31
7-30
8-29
9-28
10-27
11-26
12-25
13-24
14-23
15-22
16-21
17-20
18-19
There are no mutual exclusions in roulette.
If this were the case, then the numbers would be covered with black plastic, until there was only one left, for example.

[MoneyT101]

If Mel has a grail, as far as I know he has been claiming it for several years. Why is he still on the lookout? Conclusion he tries to impose his point of view, not understanding whether it is correct or not. So he is misleading people.
As usual, the same scenario is viewed. Blurred answers, like previous gurus. And if the answer is not clear, then the respondent does not have a clear understanding of what is happening.

You see, if I take a physics textbook or a computer repair textbook and read it a hundred times. I will begin to understand and apply this approach in practice. But in the case of the grails, this does not happen. It begs a logical conclusion.

Yes i have claimed to have "my version" of a winning method. I needed a progression and it can get risky.  Im not sure if you actually played a progression but increasing your bet each spin gets scary after a couple.  So i had no choice but to keep looking.  I enjoy the experience and i dont see it as a waste of time.  I can possibly use what i learned later...

which became true!!! all the practice looking at cycles. i can spot a cycle in anything. I can create more numbers and play cycles on them and reference back to the originals; it will still behave the same.  These are things i wouldn't have learned without all my failures.

Now my game play doesnt need a progression.  I can catch a repeat on whichever spin, it doesnt surprise me.   spin 2, spin 3, spin 4, etc dont matter

Can i win with the current method? YES  Should i give up in finding the grail dyksexlic gave an example of? NO

Whats the difference between what i have now and what dyksexlic shared?   I win overall but i still have losing cycles.  it doesnt matter cause i make way more then i lose.  But dyksexlic version didnt lose any cycle.  Now i can see how he put it together and i can see how to do it.  The problem is my math is off somewhere and its not adding up properly

So again i repeat (no pun intended) Should i give up?   Does this take away that i can win flatbet without it?  Does my search for perfection bother you?

[Akiraa]

Dyksexlic`s methods are never very far from coming back for discussion! I was one of the original `followers` back in the day - never did figure it out but genuinely believe he had something very special. I was the one who kept and numbered all of his posts after they disappeared from here (I believe the numbered ones posted here recently were originally from my archive as the numbers match).
I`m just very glad some clever folks have managed to use them to crack the code as it was something I could never do!

Not sure if significant or not but I always kept coming back to the posts below as for some reason I thought they held the key to all of it. Posting here again for discussion:

55*
dyksexlic would I be on the right path thinking that it is some form of differential betting so that you will have different "held bets" on different numbers or groups of numbers?? I. e different amounts of units on different numbers

I have also been thinking about muliple 38 spin sessions overlapping each other sort of like:

If this is one 38 spins session
|_______|

then another session could overlap it like so:
|_______|
    |_______|

So that when the first session ends and we have our garaunteed repeater, we will be in the middle of our second session.

Not sure where I'm going with this just a thought

hopefully you can shed some light on it
56*

@ redhot
The Force is strong within you, redhot. .
Well spotted mate, but these knuckleheads aren't listening to you.  You're more intelligent than the herd.
If I were you, I would keep some of your 'discoveries' to yourself.  Go back slowly over your posts. .
Work in private mate.  Keep going !

redhot by NAME, redhot by NATURE.

Cheers!

Akiraa

[MoneyT101]

7 and 14 for example are both mapped to the same pigeonhole?

any number can be in the same pigeonhole, it depends how you are grouping things

[MoneyT101]

There are no mutual exclusions in roulette.

hmmm is that right?  i'll let you keep believing that

[MoneyT101]

Dyksexlic`s methods are never very far from coming back for discussion! I was one of the original `followers` back in the day - never did figure it out but genuinely believe he had something very special. I was the one who kept and numbered all of his posts after they disappeared from here (I believe the numbered ones posted here recently were originally from my archive as the numbers match).
I`m just very glad some clever folks have managed to use them to crack the code as it was something I could never do!

dyksexlic would I be on the right path thinking that it is some form of differential betting so that you will have different "held bets" on different numbers or groups of numbers?? I. e different amounts of units on different numbers

hi, welcome back!

spin 1 start of stitched bet
spin 2 stitched bet continued...........spin 2 start of new stitched bet

[MoneyT101]

CarpeDiem 

how about it?

[Akiraa]

Thanks for the welcome back! Will need to look into stitched bets - am i right in thinking these are the same as the held bets dyksexlic used to refer to? Could be wrong as it has been a while since I thought about those posts in any great depth!

Cheers!

Akiraa

[Person S]

Yes, I believe that there are no couples. And to be more precise, I see with my own eyes that the roulette wheel always has 37 numbers. These are not cards in which you can exclude those that have already appeared.
Here's a more abstract example - you can't make a giraffe out of a frog, right? Even if we take frog DNA and plant it on a giraffe. Although there is a possibility that a chimera will turn out, it will not be a frog or a giraffe, but something in between. This is her nature. So it is in roulette - if there is (-2.7%), then no matter how hard you try, it is invincible. Because that's her nature. And DNA transplantation will not help here)

[MoneyT101]

Yes, I believe that there are no couples. And to be more precise, I see with my own eyes that the roulette wheel always has 37 numbers. These are not cards in which you can exclude those that have already appeared.
Here's a more abstract example - you can't make a giraffe out of a frog, right? Even if we take frog DNA and plant it on a giraffe. Although there is a possibility that a chimera will turn out, it will not be a frog or a giraffe, but something in between. This is her nature. So it is in roulette - if there is (-2.7%), then no matter how hard you try, it is invincible. Because that's her nature. And DNA transplantation will not help here)

              

If there wasnt a 2.7% advantage..........you can win?

if your answer is no.  then clearly that proves that you arent losing because of it.

[MoneyT101]

Thanks for the welcome back! Will need to look into stitched bets - am i right in thinking these are the same as the held bets dyksexlic used to refer to? Could be wrong as it has been a while since I thought about those posts in any great depth!

Cheers!

Akiraa

I never put much thought into the meanings behind held bets and progressive bets.  i just try to look at the info and create decisions

[Person S]

dick sex lick
By the way, have you ever wondered why such a nickname. It looks like the guy really laughed.

[Person S]

If there wasnt a 2.7% advantage..........you can win?

if your answer is no.  then clearly that proves that you arent losing because of it.

Played breakeven

[6th-sense]

I was the one who kept and numbered all of his posts after they disappeared from here (I believe the numbered ones posted here recently were originally from my archive as the numbers match).

it is buddy..redhot gave me them a long time back..you originally put them in the downloads section..but thats no longer here anymore...

so i asked redhot...i don't know if he gave them all to me but he said he did...nice to see you back also