Roulette Simulator - Method Testing

[Akiraa]

Good stuff mate- glad they are still doing the rounds. No matter what the `non believers` said I always knew there was something powerful behind the clues. It was far too detailed to be a hoax (even if they were clues rather than outright telling everyone!).

I totally get why he didn`t just give it all away and tried to help those that would help themselves.

Glad you guys have finally worked through the clues and found something that works.

Thanks for the warm welcome back also, roulette is something I enjoy studying but alas life tends to get in the way. I always seem to come back to it though for better or worse!

Cheers!

Akiraa

[MoneyT101]

The problem is my math is off somewhere and its not adding up properly

I see what i am doing wrong finally.... not sure how to calculate the math properly so might have to sit on it a bit.

But if i get this right then i should be able to get to the 100%

I'm excited

[Steve]

When you understand the basics, you'll understand what does and doesn't work, and why. And you'll understand how you fool yourself into thinking something is working when its not. But after some time of having the "holy grail", you might find yourself still poor and living in mom's basement. Maybe you had the HG and the casino changed something to make you lose, but you're really really close to finding the secret, right?

Again, you cant beat roulette without increasing accuracy of predictions. What you're doing changes nothing.

[Akiraa]

Glad you are getting somewhere in the quest for perfection mate. Gives hope to us all! After so long away I think i`d just be happy to get a method out of all of the clues that consistantly wins more than it loses. Was only ever able to get ones which sometimes win - sometimes lose but never anything anywhere near being a consistant winner.

Cheers!

Akiraa

[Herbyx]

why such a nickname

The first part comes from Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm.
My English is too weak to explain, but the net is full of info.

[6th-sense]

When you understand the basics, you'll understand what does and doesn't work

totally agree

[6th-sense]

Again, you cant beat roulette without increasing accuracy of predictions

there is an alternative...don't predict...you don't have to....

you use computers...all you need to to do is let the wheel does what it has to do naturally...what it can't get away from..

anyway back to my basement...get the old dear to make me a hot chocolate

[6th-sense]

When you understand the basics, you'll understand what does and doesn't work, and why. And you'll understand how you fool yourself into thinking something is working when its not. But after some time of having the "holy grail", you might find yourself still poor and living in mom's basement. Maybe you had the HG and the casino changed something to make you lose, but you're really really close to finding the secret, right?

Again, you cant beat roulette without increasing accuracy of predictions. What you're doing changes nothing

regardless..i agree with some points...one of the reasons this forum is dying is because you...the owner won't

let the boys play in the playground...yep i know your response already....you said it a million times...i have

 no idea why this forum is here ...everyone should go to vics new forum ....

yep i know...your telling it as it is...if you don,t understand the basics you are dumb...live in a basement,,,

though i,m sure you did videos in your basement?

must be a basement issue...hope you get hot chocolate too...

but anyway...people are glad vic doesn,t understand the basics...in fact he encourages members..lovely guy..

he must be dumber than me.....bet he gets a scone with his hot chocolate...

[Irish88]

What is the new forum name if I may ask?

Thank you

[6th-sense]

//rouletteideas.com/index.php

[Steve]

Vic has yet another forum? Wow. How many times can that guy break his word?

regardless..i agree with some points...one of the reasons this forum is dying is because you...the owner won't let the boys play in the playground...yep i know your response already....you said it a million times...i have

I say things you dont like to hear (verifiable truth). What an asshole I am. I do not stifle discussion. You're just struggling with a bit of "inconvenient information".

but anyway...people are glad vic doesn,t understand the basics...in fact he encourages members..lovely guy..

Encouraging ignorance is good? I encourage open discussion. You're just unhappy about inconvenient truth. How often have I posted and let you guys continue to be ignorant? The after ages I post, you complain.

You prefer blissful ignorance, wasted time and money, so go to vics new forum. I've said many times I prefer a quiet forum with accurate information than a forum full of shit. I keep the forum mostly to have a place with balanced and fair moderation, and somewhere I can give accurate advice.

[Steve]

6th, is there ANY verifiable proof that any of your approaches overcome the difference between odds and payouts?

Do your methods change the odds of the game at all? Let me guess, you don't have to change the odds, right? It's like saying when you shoot your own head at point blank range, you don't need to move your head to survive. Only you dont understand WHY, so you remain ignorant.

Let me get this straight: I allow you to remain ignorant. I also allow ignorant and pointless roundabout discussions. Why? Because people can just learn for themselves. Maybe dont cry when someone explains Earth isnt flat.

Imagine if a professional player (someone actually making money from roulette) came to a forum full of consistently losing players. Would they be tolerant of the truth they try to share? Nope. Anyone can choose a forum with bullshit, or truth.

Ultimately you prefer ignorance over reality. Its your right.

[6th-sense]

Ultimately you prefer ignorance over reality. Its your right.

ditto..

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

 

[Gogi357]

Hi everyone,

I've been following for quite some time, reading over and over again what Dyk, Rrbb, Mel, 6th etc have written, and I think we all (myself included)  forget an important detail - timing (when to bet).
Of course I might be wrong, but I see noone mentioning it, hence my assumption.
As for why I think it's important, Dyk himself refers to it in two of his currently available posts.
@MoneyT101, maybe this is the 20% you are missing. Just a guess, as I have absolutely no idea what's the other 80%.