When to Start

[saihtaM]

One could also add up the numbers until a certain sum is reached/exceeded, and then start over. Creates another form of cycles and dependencies.

Example:

3...3
7...10
11...21
32...53
23...76
1...77
13...90
35...125 (we exceeded 100, which is just an example, and start over)
12...47
Etc.

(I'm not claiming this is the basis for a winning method.)

[TRD]

Another view, according to Pri:

Imagine there are two streams. One stream has 0 numbers and one stream has all 37 numbers. As spins happen you keep moving numbers from one stream to other. One stream is increasing and other is decreasing.  They are both dependent on each other because only when a number is removed from one it can be added to other.

OK Blueprint, this actually makes sense;

since its sets the fundamentals of a balanced betting strategy, betting unhits on one side & the hits+repests on the other - providing both streams are bet simultaneously.


However, two things:
•
the only stream that would effectively keep changing its sequence order is the hit+repeats meanwhile, the unhit would effectively stay the same the change being its size only
•the above is already all achieved simply by looking at the rrbb's derived stream, precisely at the first portion of it & the unchanged, less in size, the second portion of it


So my question is, besides (inadvertendly? )pointing this out - are you implying at anything else ?

One could also add up the numbers until a certain sum is reached/exceeded, and then start over. Creates another form of cycles and dependencies.

saihtaM, this vaguely correlates to the PhP Pair-Completion, precisely the sum-up of pairs values to a unified sum value for each & all pairs, perhaps implying to limit the cycle to only so-many spins before starting the cycle anew, irregardless if in positive or not; the advantage being keeping the drawdowns recoverable.

Is this it, or is there something else you had on mind  or  envision this differently?

[Blueprint]

OK Blueprint, this actually makes sense;

Glad to hear that!

[praline]

There are errors in the tracker - I calculated the position incorrectly.

You shoud try To install English version for screenshots.
I also had problems with tracker when i make screenshots on russian version of Android.

[praline]

Another view, according to Pri:

Imagine there are two streams. One stream has 0 numbers and one stream has all 37 numbers. As spins happen you keep moving numbers from one stream to other. One stream is increasing and other is decreasing.  They are both dependent on each other because only when a number is removed from one it can be added to other.

Neve Read this one. But i did tried similar things and this one also.
As rrbb Said " its a breathing thing. .. like the tides " ....or something like that.
If you code it you Will See a straight Line somewhere in The middle 18/19.
You can try to do cycles on those twins But it Will bring you nowhere. But it is still fun

[praline]

Blueprint, sharing The info that you have is unproductive. After each your share The goodfellows  Will test their idea And if it  Will work They Will keep It for themselfs.

Try this instead:

"Look At The carpet. You have TWO halves....."

And than add this:

"....Till lenght eight it holds."

[praline]

And this :

-1,-1,-1,-1,+35


Message me if You find something valuable,  as i dont have time for this sh't anymore. 

[Blueprint]

Blueprint, sharing The info that you have is unproductive. After each your share The goodfellows  Will test their idea And if it  Will work They Will keep It for themselfs.

Try this instead:

"Look At The carpet. You have TWO halves....."

And than add this:

"....Till lenght eight it holds."

I could

And this :

-1,-1,-1,-1,+35


Message me if You find something valuable,  as i dont have time for this sh't anymore. 

Yea, I don’t have time for it either but I’m compelled to share for various reasons. 

You can thank Pri and RRBB for abandoning ship.   Doubt they have time for it either though.   

[praline]

They have plenty of time lol

I dont know man if Im pointing you  in The right direction, But It is different from what we have tried with You And others from this forum.
To be more explicit:

You have 2 halves high And Low.
When cycle started on Low You have more than 50% that the repeat is on that half And Less then 50 that uniques Will be from that half, so Just base on this You dont need To think about what half To Bet for repeat or forse uniques.

[Blueprint]

They have plenty of time lol

I think you’d be surprised

[RayManZ]

Neve Read this one. But i did tried similar things and this one also.
As rrbb Said " its a breathing thing. .. like the tides " ....or something like that.
If you code it you Will See a straight Line somewhere in The middle 18/19.
You can try to do cycles on those twins But it Will bring you nowhere. But it is still fun

I think i posted this way back with some graphs. The cycles go on wave. But it doesnt work in the long run. You need something extra. The missing key. Something to bet less numbers

[Blueprint]

Yes, perhaps we need to find a way to not bet on L’s.

[praline]

Guys,
If You are whilling To disclose years of OUR hard work,  nobody Can denie You to  do that. But If You are going to put parts of puzzle here hopin that somebody Will help You, i Will post everything, And Not only parts of rrbbs And Pri letters.

So all of You Can decide Now.  Or You start to putting in The hard work And think, or The roulette rules Will be changed over Night.

Have a Nice evening!

[praline]

And trust me!

Three are a Lot of Smart people that Can find The solution in Less than 24h whith all The info that some of You have for years. 

[praline]

So all of You Can decide Now.  Or You start to putting in The hard work And think, or The roulette rules Will be changed over Night

Testings And discoveries included btw.