Bonkers Outside The Box System

[Taotie]

Easy session again, briefly moving into stage 2.

youtu.be/a_C1aC11efM

[Toimeme]

Bonjour Taotie,
Merci pour le partage de ton système. Je suis très intéressée et j'essaie de m'en servir.

J'ai bien compris les premières conditions pour parier mais pas la suite.
Que faire quand on ne gagne pas le 1er coup? On continue avec les mêmes numeros et on attaque de suite la progression ?
Et une fois qu'on gagne, on recommence depuis le début ou on continue avec les mêmes numeros ?

Merci d'avance de ta réponse.

Désolé pour la langue, je suis français mais avec l'outil traduction ça passe pas mal.
À bientôt

[Taotie]

BTW, the only reason the system in these video sessions waits 5 or more spins at the start is because it's building the EC filter, then betting the most recent repeat. In real casino play there would already be spins on the board, so no need to wait. In real play you just kick off with the most recent repeat and bet non-stop. You are never actually waiting for 'triggers'.

Here's a session that reached stage 3, though never in any trouble of reaching the 100 unit test target.

FYI stage 3 is betting,

4/8a
8b/16a
16b/40

In stage 3, change the bet on every new repeat.


youtu.be/22QMwrtSA_4

[Taotie]

Another game reaching stage 3, but only for 10 spins near the end. The last spin is at new bankroll high and betting stage 1, then test target reached.

Don't forget, remain on any current stage until new bankroll high, in which case return to stage 1 or stop at win goal. And any stage progression end moves up a stage.


youtu.be/DC6bY8fPSkU

[algojack]

Taotie,

Thanks for completing the system details. To date, what's the largest drawdown you've experienced?

[Taotie]

My biggest drawdown to date is about 1300, but I haven't actually lost a session yet, so that figure could be unreliable. When I do eventually lose a session I expect you could possibly double that. It's hard to tell because you could lose a session and be close to where you started, or you could lose a session and be in some trouble. If you do the math, an absolute worst case scenario where you bet every round to max drawdown and never get a single win the loss would be 5635 units.

The system has 3 more stages that are not often needed and not yet disclosed.

[nottophammer]

Taotie
are you going public with BillionLoudspeak on R-sim; so we can see the graph

[Taotie]

Taotie
are you going public with BillionLoudspeak on R-sim; so we can see the graph

Not planning on that anytime soon. I'll decide once I've reached 100 played sessions.

[airball1022]

Dear Roulette Players,

I read this website for many years and lot of users are using lot of time to discuss on each topic every day. Why don't we think differently to identify whom really has a winning system?
I believe the winning system can't be coded or computerized. Only the brain can adjust the winning numbers accordingly. 
Most of people in here said, they found the system. But no one yet break the algorithm. Therefore, I call for system admin to make the competition among users in this website whom want to say found the system; If the real person with winning system can identify; others can listen or follow him rather than wasting time and money for useless.
The way of competition:
Admin need to attend for this or another volunteer. 
Give 25 or more examples at least 6 numbers of the history by admin/volunteer to predict the winning number within next 4 spins. (depends on others ideas, but max within 6 spins). Take these target numbers from many various roulette games. (online, real, airball etc)
Users can give max 12 numbers for each set of prediction.
Who has accurate winning numbers may has good winning system.

BR
Airball

[nottophammer]

Is that 100 winning sessions or showing losses as well

[Taotie]

Notto, I hope it's 100 winning sessions.

Even though my games were full of silly mistakes, I was at 30 winning sessions then made a fatal mouse click error.

I was betting 16 units and won. Next bet was back to 4 units but I didn't double click the bet changer properly and mistakenly ended up adding 4 to the 16. I wasn't paying attention and clicked spin before noticing the bet was 164 units on 10 numbers. It lost. That was the last straw for mistakes, so I spat the dummy and did a reset.

I'm still making mistakes here and there but will try my hardest not to make any more fatal errors like that.

Currently back up to 50 played sessions with 50 wins, half way home. It's a shame, I should have been at 80.

If I do lose any sessions they will be in the graph.

Here's what the graph looks like now. Ignore the big hump near the start, that was another stupid mistake, but it went my way that time so I'll live with it. It was a winning session anyway, just should be less.

[Taotie]

Here you go,
I had a day off today so played some games. Now at 61 x 100 unit target wins.

[ludo8400]

What is a blend example?
Ludo84

[ludo8400]

@taotie
What is blend example?
Ludo8400

[Mister Eko]

Notto, I hope it's 100 winning sessions.

Even though my games were full of silly mistakes, I was at 30 winning sessions then made a fatal mouse click error.

I was betting 16 units and won. Next bet was back to 4 units but I didn't double click the bet changer properly and mistakenly ended up adding 4 to the 16. I wasn't paying attention and clicked spin before noticing the bet was 164 units on 10 numbers. It lost. That was the last straw for mistakes, so I spat the dummy and did a reset.

I'm still making mistakes here and there but will try my hardest not to make any more fatal errors like that.

Currently back up to 50 played sessions with 50 wins, half way home. It's a shame, I should have been at 80.

If I do lose any sessions they will be in the graph.

Here's what the graph looks like now. Ignore the big hump near the start, that was another stupid mistake, but it went my way that time so I'll live with it. It was a winning session anyway, just should be less.

You immediately reseted, when you made a mistake, but it was a loss, but you did not reset when you made again a mistake, but you won.