Winning Structurally

[6th-sense]

i think i could be...please give a few examples with a narrative  to show me the point i,m missing....i can then take a view on the way you are thinking and work to your point of view

[Blueprint]

I can't post the proper formatting here but right the following numbers are aligned as follows.  Bottom row, 123
Above that, 45, above that 6.

What do you see?

And is it the same or different from the following?
7,9,11
12,15
21

Yes, there are relationships here but I'm aiming for a base structure... then we look at characteristics for a sub bet.

[Blueprint]

Ugh.

There should be a space before the 45 and 2 spaces before the 6. 

[6th-sense]

i did give the example of all at the beginning.....your still not clear...well to me anyway....sounds like a sub bet from double streams tracker in a roundabout way.....

[MoneyT101]

I can't post the proper formatting here but right the following numbers are aligned as follows.  Bottom row, 123
Above that, 45, above that 6.

What do you see?

And is it the same or different from the following?
7,9,11
12,15
21

Yes, there are relationships here but I'm aiming for a base structure... then we look at characteristics for a sub bet.

Place it into excel and take a screenshot, is this what you mean?

*attached image

[Blueprint]

In the past I couldn't attach images so I don't bother anymore.

It's not what I meant but the structure still holds.

[MoneyT101]

In the past I couldn't attach images so I don't bother anymore.

It's not what I meant but the structure still holds.

Can you give a better example so we can all be on the same page with you?

[Blueprint]

Can you give a better example so we can all be on the same page with you?

No, perhaps do some research around structure.

[KoolKat]

In the past I couldn't attach images so I don't bother anymore.

It's not what I meant but the structure still holds.

Is this what you mean Blueprint
       6
  4  5
1 2 3

[6th-sense]

No, perhaps do some research around structure.

a bit frustrating...you start a thread ..your being asked how you want us to proceed ...and explain a bit better where you are coming from....

you are not being very helpful here...the comment perhaps do some research around structure....this comes across that you have no idea as of yet or a partial idea that you are stuck on..
also comes across that you want people to do the running about and present ideas to you...which in turn you won,t do to them...

i could give two definite examples with full explanations...one with rrbb streams tracker...the other not..but ive held back to see how this thread pans out..

[Badger]

"No, perhaps do some research around structure."

LOL. Blueprint is one of the most patient people I know but I think we have stretched him to his limit. 

I have always tested the opposite of any bet that I was researching as per CEH suggestion.
But I never thought of doing it this way. It's ingenious.

[Blueprint]

a bit frustrating...you start a thread ..your being asked how you want us to proceed ...and explain a bit better where you are coming from....

you are not being very helpful here...the comment perhaps do some research around structure....this comes across that you have no idea as of yet or a partial idea that you are stuck on..
also comes across that you want people to do the running about and present ideas to you...which in turn you won,t do to them...

i could give two definite examples with full explanations...one with rrbb streams tracker...the other not..but ive held back to see how this thread pans out..

So, what?

To be blunt, I don’t owe anyone sht.

I’ve shared more ideas and information over the years than anyone else here.  Now you need me to do more work for you?  No, thanks. 

[Blueprint]

"No, perhaps do some research around structure."

LOL. Blueprint is one of the most patient people I know but I think we have stretched him to his limit. 

I have always tested the opposite of any bet that I was researching as per CEH suggestion.
But I never thought of doing it this way. It's ingenious.

Good to see you Badger. 

[MoneyT101]

No, perhaps do some research around structure.

  Sounds good

[Badger]

I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I will give it a go.

let's say we are playing cycles for LINES. To win a cycle we would normally, after the defining LINE play :

Spin 1      Position 1
Spin 2      Position 1&2
Spin 3      Position  1,2&3

The opposite could be

Spin 1      Position 4,5&6
Spin 2      Position 5&6
Spin 3      Position 6

This reminds me of a thread that Priyanka started :
If this, then that.