What's next...

[praline]

Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?
 
Thanks for all replies!

[praline]

I will try to answer the questions that one my have.

What balance?
Balance between high/low derived BUT under a condition. Not very different it’s something like 52% before and 50 % now.

[praline]

Limit it with combined cycle.

Actually it is not that I’m looking on how to limit it as it has a natural end. The question is how I can use this conditional balance.

[D1]

Can you give an example please ?

[praline]

An example of what?
Of conditional probability?
Of combined cycle?
Of balance?
Of the end of the cycle?
An example of what??

[Blueprint]

Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?

Thanks for all replies!

By keeping sessions short?  No idea otherwise.

[praline]

Your answer is more priyanka’s way of play (aka random thoughts).
How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?

[praline]

I think that “short sessions” is more a statistical approach, like cycles on cycles on cycles bets combined with non random.
Instead here I’m looking for a way to use the process of number generation that is apparently random but if you look under different prospective or angle it’s not random any more.

[praline]

Another question based on previous thoughts:

Often what happens more loose more so maybe I should focus on some event within those cycles that maybe is rarer than others but it will happen 100% on every cycle?? Is there such an event within combined cycle?

[praline]

/quote]

Or maybe some combination of events can give almost 100

[Blueprint]

Your answer is more priyanka’s way of play (aka random thoughts).
How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?

By defining why you’re placing them. 

[praline]

Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place we’re those missing 26% (~) has gone?

[praline]

By defining why you’re placing them.

But the average is 5-6 spins and you should win without predicting.

[MoneyT101]

Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place we’re those missing 26% (~) has gone?

Hey praline been a while, how’s everything?

Not sure how you got to 70%.  A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

[Herbyx]

A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

Hi all,
after computer crash  and loss of several passwords I'm here with an extended name

Simulation:
500.000 spins without zero (for simplicity)
Repeat from position:
{{1, 41683}, {2, 31419}, {3, 21835}, {4, 14012}, {5, 8155},
{6, 4160}, {7, 1837}, {8, 635}, {9, 196}, {10, 52}, {11, 7}}

gives 97.8% repeats on low

CU