Sputnik's March

[ego]

Betting on a rolling basis, two options

First LW-Registry with clusters with four losses.

LW W LW W W W LLW W LW W W LW LLW LLLW W LLW LLLW LW W W W W LLLL LW W LW W W LW LW LLLL LLW W LLLL LW W LW LLLL W W LW W LW LLW W W W W LW W W LW W LLW W LW W W W W LW LW W LW W W W LW LW W W LLW LW LW LW

Second LW-Registry with clusters with three losses.

LW W LW W W W LLL W W LW W W LW LLL LLW W LLL LLW LW W W W W LLW LW W LW W W LW LW LLW LLL W LLW LW W LW LLW W W LW W LW LLL W W W W LW W W LW W LLL W LW W W W W LW LW W LW W W W LW LW W W LLL LW LW LW

[ego]

You can find the description on Victor's new forum ...

Cheers

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

So what's next ?

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

8 Sessions still doing good...

[VLS]

You can find the description on Victor's new forum

Topic: rouletteideas.com/concepts/the-concept-of-13-for-even-money-advance/

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

Look this what a run...

[Alberto50]

These things don't work man, save your time.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

What works, give me something..

[Alberto50]

Only physical systems can work, roulette computers, dealer signature, wheel bias, (i could add very specific dealer collusion, despite it being illegal, in theory if you would be able to get a dealer that spins the rotor and the ball at a similar speeds, then if the ball doesn't bounce that much just this would give you a big edge, obviously it's safer to find a dealer like this, but it takes time and it will be never as accurate as deliberate section targeting by the dealer) you need to learn some programming, find maybe existing programs or hire someone to make a software specified for whatever method you choose.

Then you need to test them, this takes time etc. and most likely you would understand at which wheel conditions your system is applicable, but it's the only way to do it. All other "methods" are randomness packed just in some supposed patterns, none of black/red/dozens/columns bets is beatable, the only way is to bet specific numbers, but do it by physics, not by statistics or "36 come up 4 times, now i bet something else", none of this work, and if you ever did any simulations, you probably know, that it takes hundreds of thousands or even millions of spins to more or less even up the specific number hits, sometimes it looks like there is some wheel bias, but it's fake illusion and just randomness.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

I am not saying No on what you referring not either Yes..
 Does anyone else agree with this so we throw everything else on the bin?

[Person S]

If you make a bet with physics, it implies that the wheel is biased, right? And either the sector or the number will beat faster than expected. But if we, for example, use a system similar to yours, but only using maths, why would we be on different numbers?

[nottophammer]

Person S
I've contact with Alex. But last contact came with a warning. phishing.
But he has the way to be +300 or plus a 1st profit.
There's more over at GF.

[Person S]

Thanks Notto, was on GF saw the post and noticed a lot of repetition without a change of leader, yo it would have been so easy always 
But you once mentioned that you need a bank of 5000 as drawdowns are inevitable - is this for 1 chip bets or 5 chip bets? I've seen recommendations for 1 in 1000, but here it's 1 in 5000 lol

[nottophammer]

S
We study the riddles. With further testing one gets nearer and nearer to success.
The pic shows only a 3'000 Bank.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

Not a stable session but in +