Bloomberg story from Ritz Casino

[INTERCEPTOR]

And bloomberg finally revealed the story
bloomberg.com/features/2023-how-to-beat-roulette-gambler-figures-it-out/

[Steve]

You dont need a roulette computer to beat roulette. If the wheel is easy, VB is enough. But a properly designed computer can beat far more wheels than VB, and with much higher edge.

Nothing new in the article, and casinos and people like Barnett are still behind. Media contact me evey now and then for input but no interest. Barnett had a sook i refused to send him my computer for free to test. But i did offer to show him in person, a limited version. He wasnt happy so he resorted to illegally publishing my photo from casino records (sending to miro zirdum / forester to publish). There are pieces of shit in this industry, more so than others.

Last i knew, barnett was trying to replicate my hybrid computer but never succeeded. Besides, he makes his computers not to use himself, but just to convince casinos to hire him to protect them from teams like mine. But like typical casino staff, he's way behind.

Barnett managed to get foresters device and after full testing he said  "Time will tell if there is a viable threat to modern well-maintained roulette wheels but at this stage the FF device is not it.". Of course Forester lied about it.

As for rrs, most it does is halve edge, often 80% to 40%. We can live with that i think, even though rrs is very rare. They could hypothetically turn rrs way up to reduce egde further, but then normal players lose trust in the game and casinos lose even more. We still even get about 5% edge on cammegh slingshots. And we even have the source code for alfastreets which have serious flaws in the algorithm, which is probably why they resort to super fast rotor.

Ultimately the ritz team just exploited easy wheels. Higher stakes gets attention is all. I watch my players do it via live stream every few days at least, but with smaller stakes to avoid detection.