Let’s chat …

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

What about that process!

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

!

[leoncino74]

We... saw each other on this some time ago. but how to exploit it, what is the logic, I know, it's been years, but it doesn't come out, thanks

[Rond1nell1x]

@alexlaf If you could detail these flows and give some clues on how to exploit them, I would appreciate it. In my image I highlighted both flows as cycles as pryanka showed us. I believe it is possible to exploit them if you know how to combine an attack.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

We... saw each other on this some time ago. but how to exploit it, what is the logic, I know, it's been years, but it doesn't come out, thanks

What you found about this. Maybe it is just a lesson as others!

@alexlaf If you could detail these flows and give some clues on how to exploit them, I would appreciate it. In my image I highlighted both flows as cycles as pryanka showed us. I believe it is possible to exploit them if you know how to combine an attack.

I will post a full image but I can't tell what I do as it can be wrong! You can analyze!
 

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

Here...

[MoneyT101]

It's always better to keep things as simple as possible.

So you are saying that is the way as per dozen, doesn't that get to complicated for higher positions? In any case we don't need all of them.

I'm not saying this is the way.  I'm just sharing different angles that maybe others haven't looked at.  Yes it get complicated with higher groups but very interesting. 

Like with DS there's over 6000+ different combinations.  And with 21 permutations you can cover each one 🤣

1)Probability of moving to a high section given the previous spin was in the low section!
2)Probability of moving to a low section given the previous spin was in the high section!

What if there is a way to make it seem like you are playing both?  Im just throwing out ideas and different angles

Remember there are NO RULES.  You are creating them.  You don't have to follow cycles.  You don't have to win on repeated number.  You create rules based on what happens but you can also change the rules of YOUR SYSTEM. Nothing is written in stone saying this is the way to do it.

[6th-sense]

just going to quote akiraas post off pralines thread


C: there are 4 subsets on either colour
C: odd low
C: even low
C: odd high
C: even high
C: if i say black even high is referring to 20 22 24 26 28 and nothing else
C: if 24 show you play on the whole subset
C: inside bets
C: 5 chips
C: but 2 chips on either black odd and low
C: if a black show
C: it must be that subset or if not then 4 chips win 2 chips loss on even chances
C: you understand it?
C: whats the purpose?
C: to have a repeat on that subset and win 33 chips!!!!!
C: seeking a subset will repeat - outside bets feeding partially inside bets
C: seeking the big win
C: with the inside bets
C: there are 8 subsets in total plus 0
C: but dont doubt it - D. plays 38 chips on every bet
C: that's why he talks about 38 x 36
C: well
C: 38 x 2 = 76
C: 76 x 36 = 2736 chips - D. bankroll
C: 38 spins worse scenario
C: 36 chips for every bet
C: well this is going too far for the moment - talking about amounts of chips to bet
C: but most important we need to find how he makes both brothers win every cycle playing this way
C: 1 brother playing on black, the other one playing on red
N: i think he play 76 unit for 38 spin
C: yes you are right i agree
N: hmm...
C: but of course there are losses till we achieve a win
N: something wrong
N: 76 x 38 = 2888
C: 76x36 2736
 C: right
N: but he said 38 spin
N: 1 st spin no bet
C: well this is my 2 cts assumption
C: im not talking about percentages for the bets
N: 72 x 38 spin = 2736
C: yes thats right too
C: wait a moment please
C i got to go guys
N: thanks C... really appreciate it
N: one thing about betting outside bet is we need to take care of the zero- still scratching my head
C: no big worries about 0
C: D. treats it like another number
C: he seek 0 repetition if it shows
N: thanks for the brainstorming
C: welcome mate



heres another interpretation from me

here is my interpretation of rrbb  bankroll...

from what the majority believes dyslexic taught red/rrbb

rrbb has in the outside of the box thread specifically shown you the streams tracker and cycles..

everyone should by now have the streams tracker off my thread..

now lets take rrbb streams tracker as it is ...ds...street...split...str8..

the main purpose is not to go beyond 37 spins ...law of large numbers etc..

1st I,ll give you the breakdown...


lets start with the streams ..

ds there are 6....

lets add up the total amount to bet all 6 one after the other

1,2,3,4,5,6 = 21... there 6 lots of these cycles in 37 spins...so 21x6= 126

same for streets .

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12=78   there are 3 full cycles in 37 spins so 78x3=234

same for splits

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18= 171 there are 2 full cycles in 37 spins so 171x2= 342

same for straight

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36=666

there is only 1 cycle of these numbers..

total bankroll = 1368  ..

main and positional is 1368x2 =2736

twin brothers?

dyslexics original way was to bet on an ec to cover table outlay bet....twin brothers here?

from what is known rrbb adjusted adjusted dyslexics main bet and with his double streams example showing only that repeats came in lo postional...

he even told you that you could not win on this alone...both dyslexics bet and rrbb bet rely on a 72 number system


so here is a little fun fact

6ds....12streets...18splits..36 str8

6+12+18+36=72   ...

72x37 =2664 +2.7percent house edge 71.928 =2735.923....very close to 2736

[Blueprint]

Confirmation bias in action

[6th-sense]

so true blueprint...you have a better explanation ?...

re read carpdiems post...before you discount it i would say look a bit deeper into what i posted what and where the other balance states come from

[6th-sense]

all the above is why dyslexic is telling you that its the max bankroll needed and you cannoy lose it...as that would mean no repeats anywhere across the board...you also have to remember he always used an ec bet in conjunction with his play...the question for you is how

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

Playing main an derived we have unique and unhit, what if we add a second stream based on this!

A. -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, +30
B.  0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -30


If this is one 38 spins session
|_______|

then another session could overlap it like so:
|_______|
     |_______|

main and positional is 1368x2 =2736

[Blueprint]

2736

2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!

1+8=9

[MoneyT101]

2736

2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!

   idk why I found this so funny

There's so many possibilities that I would just believe if you found an angle and it's working for you, just continue to use it!

There's something about all this 2736 units talk, I'm hesitant to share openly.  So I'll just share it this way.

Creating dependent events + php = winning sequences