Can anyone decipher these notes ....I found on the cutting room floor?

[chrisbis]

[attach=#1]


[attach=#2]

[albertojonas]

the second one seems logical
give it a try...

[chrisbis]

Think I need to repost it in ThomasGrant style, so people can follow it.

It looks like it was written by COMMONSENSE1968.......!!

Or a money on a keyboard................................ no references please guys.

Or else Esoito will go APE sh1t.

[Proofreaders2000]

The second part was Dyslexic's 100% "foolproof" plan for winning on RNG Roulette discussed a year ago on the old VLS (it took a while to finally get the basics of the system amid the hype).  Basically, you add a chip on each number that comes up until you get a hit (eventually all 38/37 numbers will be covered with a chip) and repeat the process.

[chrisbis]

Re-post with some clarity of text (not the content)
>>>>>>
The system is a 38 spin repeating cycle betting Routine.
38 spins is the maximum allowable length of one cycle.
The minimum estimated bankroll is 2736 units and bets
are placed on every spin of the Roulette wheel.
The number of bets and coverage varies over the course of the cycle.
The betting style is a form of flat betting, which returns a 100%
guaranteed profit over the course of any cycle.
The betting system relies on the 'pigeonhole' principle of repeating number distribution
The object of the system is to return a
single repeat of a Roulette number within a spin cycle.
Once a repeating number is achieved, the 38 spin cycle starts again.
While it is extremely rare to run the entire 38 cycle from begining to end,
the sytem ALLOWS for this possibility, ensuring no loss of bankroll
could possibly occur at the end of any given cycle.
The system DOES return losing spins during the course of the 38 spin cycle,
but is MATHEMATICALLY impossible to produce an
over loss of bankroll at the end of any cycle.
The system itself cannot be broken by ANY sequence of
pseudo random numbers.
The system is, to the best of my knowledge, the ONLY way to consistantly
win the game of Roulette 100%.
The sytem doesn't use a fixed progressive betting plan
nor is it waiting for any paticular event.

[esoito]

Think I need to repost it in ThomasGrant style, so people can follow it.

It looks like it was written by COMMONSENSE1968.......!!

Or a money on a keyboard................................ no references please guys.


Or else Esoito will go APE sh1t.


And he has 'cos you couldn't spell  m o n k e y   correctly !!  

[chrisbis]

So.

All we need now is the actual system/laid method for the bet!

If anyone knows it, please post it up or

email me if Ur a Guest viewing in-

chrisbis36@yahoo.com

Would be even better, Mr/Mrs Guest, if U signed up,

and come and join this merry gang of Roulette'ers- free entry till 2025 (years not time!)

[chrisbis]

Back ground stuff.

[attachimg=#1]

The picture that they mention.
[attachimg=#2]

[Twisteruk]

So whats the progression on that 2nd one you listed Chris ?

Let us know if/when you play it ! 

[6th-sense]

the 1st example is a variation of one of the betting systems that was on here or still is called 365 roulette systems.in that one you would bet on hi at the same time as 1 unit on the number number in lo.
the one on high would break even and the one on lo would give a profit.each spin you would add another unit to both sides.it states that you start at number 1 then 2 etc but you could just as well play numbers in the lo section that came out.or the street n6 etc whichever you prefer.the 1 number just pays better odds in relation to other choices.
nothing new but good fun.
    hope every one had a nice xmas

[chrisbis]

I hope U did too 6th.

In the first example, would it be a reasoned idea to alternate the placement of the
flat number bets between the Low and the High area's too?

IE. say after the initial start, place 1 chip on #1, plus Ur covering bet on High.

then place 1 chip on #36, plus Ur covering bet on Low,

...................and thus alternate all the way down the board, this would "chase" the stepping/dancing/9movements as in the Matrix idea around the table.

Just a thought.

Appreciate Urs on the subject.


Ultimate Aim Here-

I'm trying to get to the bottom of the Pigeonhole Principle -----if that's possible!



edit:- suppose one would call it Pigeon Droppings then eh?

[reddwarf]

Hi,

the first document is NOT Dyksexlic's system, but it was a try of a forum member (I forgot if t was VLS or this one).

greetings reddwarf

[6th-sense]

chrisbis i,m pretty sure it was just a static bet to play just 1 half of the table.becouse you don,t know when the change from lo to hi would come.
for a simple variation you could simply bet hi 18 units and start betting 1 unit on a split each spin on the lo section.remember the layout of the wheel.whats oppisite all the red highs?
if you didn,t want to do it static you could do it penulimitively using the numbers that already have come out as your splits.
i think simply starting at number 1 at 1 end and number 36 at the other could be be improve with say THE LAW OF THE THIRD.
therin that statement though there is a problem if you are switching around the table becouse you will not encapture the LAW as you have encovered half the table where you could have won on the split or numbers or anything else.
i think static would be best

[6th-sense]

and just a thought in retrospect i would personelly pick numbers from the last 2 columns that have not just appeared last but the most in the last 6 spins or further back until you have your 2 columns

[chrisbis]

Interesting thought. Cheers.