• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Twisteruk

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 03, 03:17 PM 2010
Never ever for money playing on line.


why is that mate ?


dublinbet is sound  :thumbsup:
Its Set In Stone =)

Twisteruk

Quote from: GLC on Nov 03, 03:03 PM 2010
Twisteruk,

Yes, the casino Flat built his account up on was dublinbet.  He built it from 1000 to 7300 in 4 months betting .50 units.  My calculations say that means he had to win over 12,000 units in 4 months.  Mind boggling.  

He told me that he never plays for real money online.   Since he has access to casinos locally, I guess there's no need to for him.

I have been practicing playing the system and am getting quicker every day.  Flat's a pro.  Been involved in roulette most of his life.
What's easy for him is a struggle for us amateurs, but we'll get there.  Just don't jump ship, there's sharks in them thar waters.

Cheers,

George


George

I like you have played Roulette for many a year LoL but this System has me like a Newbie !

Its easy to grasp, in the end buuuuut its the cross check to see if all Doz and Col's are ticked before you then look to see what numbers you bet



Maybe you could talk me through your method ?



I write down the number and next to it its location 1-9 and then next to that its doz/col ref


but its still takin me too long


If the table at dublinbet is busy I'm ok

I can't get on at smartlive, 45 seconds isnt enough !


Maybe I can streamline some how ??
Its Set In Stone =)

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: albertojonas on Nov 03, 03:31 PM 2010
First losing Session

:(

-238


It happened to me 9 times in 4 months.
Overall counts matter.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 03, 03:46 PM 2010
why is that mate ?


dublinbet is sound  :thumbsup:
Old fashioned mate,just don't believe in things
that I'm not involved in.You wouldn't believe how many
casinos are rigged.....land-live ones,let alone these on the
screen.Here in my country 98% rigged.How do I know this?????
That's another story.........................

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 03, 03:50 PM 2010

George

I like you have played Roulette for many a year LoL but this System has me like a Newbie !

Its easy to grasp, in the end buuuuut its the cross check to see if all Doz and Col's are ticked before you then look to see what numbers you bet



Maybe you could talk me through your method ?



I write down the number and next to it its location 1-9 and then next to that its doz/col ref

No need to write a number,only sector......also no need doz/col ref.
but its still takin me too long--Cause you write uneces.---track only sectors,once you get grasp of it....much quicker.


If the table at dublinbet is busy I'm ok

I can't get on at smartlive, 45 seconds isnt enough !


Maybe I can streamline some how ??You will by weekend you get there.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Twisteruk

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 03, 04:20 PM 2010
Old fashioned mate,just don't believe in things
that I'm not involved in.You wouldn't believe how many
casinos are rigged.....land-live ones,let alone these on the
screen.Here in my country 98% rigged.How do I know this?????
That's another story.........................



I understand mate, I used to be the same. Once you do it, you get used to it.

I would love to hear that story one day if you want to share it  :)
Its Set In Stone =)

Twisteruk

No need to write a number,only sector......also no need doz/col ref.
but its still takin me too long--Cause you write uneces.---track only sectors,once you get grasp of it....much quicker
.



Flat, can you give me an example please ?


Thanx mate  :thumbsup:

Its Set In Stone =)

albertojonas

got it back

;D
+240

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 03, 05:21 PM 2010
No need to write a number,only sector......also no need doz/col ref.
but its still takin me too long--Cause you write uneces.---track only sectors,once you get grasp of it....much quicker
.



Flat, can you give me an example please ?


thanks mate  :thumbsup:


After soccer match am watching now.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

albertojonas

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 03, 05:21 PM 2010
No need to write a number,only sector......also no need doz/col ref.
but its still takin me too long--Cause you write uneces.---track only sectors,once you get grasp of it....much quicker
.



Flat, can you give me an example please ?


thanks mate  :thumbsup:



i use an excel spreadsheet
see if you can get it along with any small sector chart
half the work the spreadsheet does for you

albertojonas

Another loosing session

i must be doing something wrong....
i PM GLC (because i am working on this with him) with some questions and decided to make some of them public.
we have the recovering trigger rulle:

after a loss (a win but still negative overall)
we bet whatever 4 sectors combination wich satisfies the following:
a sector in each dozzen + never 3 sectors on same column

if win the second attempt but still not upfront?
still playing any sector combination by the recovering trigger rulle?

but if I lose at 2@32 I start progression at 1@16, or 1@24, ... where do I start?

this is were the system can be tweaked for me.

it's in the progression

have to work on this. Any help welcome.

albertojonas

turned the session around with a diferent timing aproach

i bet the progression

8
16
32
64
128
total 248 chips

to hit on the first attempt.
if not wait till another trigger qualifies and try again.

have to test more.

Hope F_LAT_INO experimented this also and as something wise to say.

Cheers,

Alberto

albertojonas

another test
new progression :( :o

albertojonas

TEST9
:-X


+852 chips in 4 Sessions.

good performance (if it were 5$chips we would have 4260$ in the pocket)  :love:

GET GREEDY

GLC

Quote from: albertojonas on Nov 03, 11:30 PM 2010
TEST9
:-X


+852 chips in 4 Sessions.

good performance (if it were 5$chips we would have 4260$ in the pocket)  :love:

GET GREEDY

Alberto,

As you can see, you are playing a very, very aggressive system.  Actually it's about the most aggressive way you can reasonably play.  You will win a bundle, but I think there will also be a lot of losses at times.

I've never thought of playing that aggressively, but if it keeps working that well for you, I might be convinced.

Cheers,

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

-