• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

Drazen

Yes it is all in memorasing the sectors. Like a baby play when you grasp it.   8) End when you reach +100 and you will be just fine.
Reagrds




F_LAT_INO

Quote from: GLC on Oct 03, 12:33 PM 2011

Wally,
PCWB works on both single zero or double zero wheels.  It is not wheel based so the only difference is the extra zero which lowers overall profits, but not by that much.


Download the tracker and play test it using spins from a 0/00 wheel and you'll see what I mean.


This may in fact be the Grail.  Can't say for absolutely yet. 


We're very fortunate that it's available for free.  Flat and Ophis could sell this baby and be able to buy a lot of smokes and bread.


Good Luck,


GLC


---I DO NOT SELL MY FRIEND,BUT YOU ARE QUITE RIGHT GEORGE THERE IS A HG IN ONE OF THESE VERSIONS AND IF ANYBODY IS A SERIOUS ROULETTE PLAYER HE WILL FIND IT....FEW DID AND ARE NOT ANY MORE HERE.THEY ARE PLAYING AND WINNING SAME AS I DO....BUT ME STILL HERE AS I LIKE YOU AND LOVE YOUR POSTS.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

birdhands

This bet is remarkably similar to the Eggleston, which has a mathematical advantage, the only difference being that the three dozens have been replaced by evenly distributed sectors on the wheel, which is why (I think) it plays well on a real wheel but not so well on RNG.  The progression is also much longer and more flexible than the Eggleston's. 

iggiv

i think the sectors is a way to go, but think about joining the wheel and the table. for example u bet a sector of 6 numbers, bet respective lines and/or quads. just an idea.

birdhands

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Aug 07, 08:23 AM 2011
Hi Marivo,
Playing 4 last and 4 furthest at the same time,one versus other,when
it is required,exp;
furthest;                          last
1                                        2
3                                        4
5                                        6
9                                        8...betting on both
5W-10                                5...won on furthest continue betting 2,4,6,8-----L=8----rise to 2
3-no bet                             3--L16-                                                                          rise to 3
8                                        8 -- W=30...................WON 40 LOST 24


And so on zig zagging...50/50 you shall be betting both bets and 50/50 only one bet.         
                       


This is a major change.  I'm having trouble understanding how this is really the same system.  When does the furthest bet reset?  In other words, when to start betting furthest again?  DRazen, Flat, are you guys still playing ABC with virtual spins to avoid chops or are you playing this zig-zag bet?

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: birdhands on Oct 03, 11:06 PM 2011

This is a major change.  I'm having trouble understanding how this is really the same system.  When does the furthest bet reset?  In other words, when to start betting furthest again?  DRazen, Flat, are you guys still playing ABC with virtual spins to avoid chops or are you playing this zig-zag bet?


--It is not the same system but the basics are same....when to reset furthest and when to start the bet....very simple as you always must have in front of you a spreadsheet that clearly shows you last 4 and furthest 4....it's like reading a book
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

birdhands

@Flatino, thanks that clears it up.  I didn't know the spreadsheet was an option.  None of the spreadsheet links seem to work anymore.  Do you play it both ways?


@Pratikpop, if you play this on RNG then you may as well just bet 2 dozens with a progression and skip all the memorization.  I seem to remember you busting your BR recently playing this at BV.  What's your record?


@Iggiv, I agree, that would be the most efficient way.

birdhands


I'm trying to figure out if the virtual betting makes a real difference.  I think this is really a math question.  Virtual betting helps us avoid these chops:

ABCABC...
ACBACB...
BACBAC...
BCABCA...
CABCAB...
CBACBA...


But then these are the new chops that will kill us (without virtual bet we would break even on these):


ABCBABCBA...
CBABCBAAC...
BACCBCACB...etc


So are we just exchanging one evil for another?  Because why go through all the trouble if it amounts to the same overall risk?

birdhands

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Oct 04, 06:35 AM 2011

--It is not the same system but the basics are same....when to reset furthest and when to start the bet....very simple as you always must have in front of you a spreadsheet that clearly shows you last 4 and furthest 4....it's like reading a book


It seems like the system has come full-circle.  In the beginning you were all betting on furthest and recent, but then everyone wanted to bet recent because it seemed to be hitting more.  That eventually led to the ABC bet, which bets the 24 most recent qualifying numbers; but now we're back to betting 32 numbers, evenly split between furthest and most recent.  My head is spinning.

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: birdhands on Oct 04, 07:42 AM 2011
@F_LAT_INO, thanks that clears it up.  I didn't know the spreadsheet was an option.  None of the spreadsheet links seem to work anymore.  Do you play it both ways?--YES IT CAN BE PLAY BOTH WAYS


@Pratikpop, if you play this on RNG then you may as well just bet 2 dozens with a progression and skip all the memorization. ------WRONG NOTHING SIMILAR WITH 2 DOZ,BET,CAUSE THIS IS WHEEL
COMPOUND BET
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: birdhands on Oct 04, 07:51 AM 2011
I'm trying to figure out if the virtual betting makes a real difference.  I think this is really a math question.  Virtual betting helps us avoid these chops:

ABCABC...
ACBACB...
BACBAC...
BCABCA...
CABCAB...
CBACBA...


But then these are the new chops that will kill us (without virtual bet we would break even on these):


ABCBABCBA...
CBABCBAAC...
BACCBCACB...etc


So are we just exchanging one evil for another?  Because why go through all the trouble if it amounts to the same overall risk?


THIS IS ONLY YOUR ENEMY.......ABBC....ACCB....BAAC....BCCA.....CBBA.....CAAB....STRIKES OF 2 ARE
STRONGEST IN THIS BET.......AND KNOW WHEN TO STOP WHEN IN PLUS,AND THAT IS MOST IMPORTANT.YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT VIRTUAL BETTING...THATS THE RIGHT WAY.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: pratikpop on Oct 04, 08:29 AM 2011
flat sir one more thing i need to ask u..when playing airball..sometimes its noe going your way..how much we set the stop-loss?as sometimes it even recovers from 500 units drawdown to 100 units profit and sometime it fails....u would be the best one to guide us


I'm playing airball on the daily basis...morning session aim to win 50-100/but not euros but kunas which is 7 times less then euro/and the afternoon session......and sir I haven't lost as yet....as I'm always starting from 1 when in plus....therefore if you are betting 6 chips per split,win and in plus restart from one.......
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

warrior

THIS thread is so long ,FLAT do you think you can put a short version of this on a new thread i really don't know where to start with this thanks.

warrior


F_LAT_INO

Quote from: warrior on Oct 04, 08:46 AM 2011
THIS thread is so long ,FLAT do you think you can put a short version of this on a new thread i really don't know where to start with this thanks.


--My friend you are asking me to explain all over again whats already said....no sir
its much easier for you to start from the begining then for me to restart explanations that are
all there.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

-