PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[ophis]

I will be working today on a tracker so I have few questions.


*should I remove Furthest
*do we still waiting for 9 sectors to appear
*should tracker list 4 recent as soon as you have 4 unique sectors?
*should tracker list proper sectors instead of "F" (5261 instead of F/R)
*should sectors be listed ascending?
*should sectors have format 1-2-3-4 or 1234. (In listing/results)

[ophis]

One more thing.

FLAT you said that when playing recent-flat then when you encounter Trigger then double your bet only for 1 spin.

###
What about if after that 1 spin (win/lose) you got another (new) trigger. You still betting 2 units?

#A. Or going back to 1.

#B. If you are going back to 1 after loss with 2 how long do you wait before betting 2 units again?

#C. If you are staying at 2 then can it be said: Every new trigger=double bet amount?


#A
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (1u?)
W 1u
...


#B
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (1u?)
L EVEN NEWER TRIGGER (still 1u?)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (can I finally have 2u?)
...


#C
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (2u?)
L EVEN NEWER TRIGGER (2u?)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u?)
...


Which one is correct.

[chrisbis]

I will be working today on a tracker so I have few questions.


*should I remove Furthest
------------ No, I like it for now at least, it wins as much as recent on certain wheels.
*do we still waiting for 9 sectors to appear
------------ Could u have a switch on the tracker where the player (user) decides on the Number of sectors to wait for? Like This;---------Choose from 75,6,7,8,9 sectors waiting.
*should tracker list 4 recent as soon as you have 4 unique sectors?
------------yes, its the earlest betting opportunity for the player, and they can always decide not to use the data.
*should tracker list proper sectors instead of "F" (5261 instead of F/R)
------------ Just the "to bet" splits/number/neighbours, unless  some people have learnt the sector order, I don't see the point of it.
*should sectors be listed ascending?
------------See no benefit it that option.
*should sectors have format 1-2-3-4 or 1234. (In listing/results)
------------ Absolutely YES YES YES, its the most confussing aspect of the tracker, in that the splits are all over the place for quick reading.

Please-

chrisbis

[chrisbis]

How does the trigger v bet amount affect the tracker- since the tracker does not take notice of the BR?

------- or does it??

[ophis]

in new version it will. For now i removed furthest and i'm making...
bankroll indicator...
W/L indicator...
sigma...
lowest bankroll
highest....

anything else?
Longest Losing something..
Longest Wining something...

[ophis]

@chris:
*should sectors have format 1-2-3-4 or 1234. (In listing/results)
------------ Absolutely YES YES YES, its the most confussing aspect of the tracker, in that the splits are all over the place for quick reading.

I dont understand this.

I was asking.... IF triggers will be listed "1234" instead of "R" then would it be better to list them 1234 or 1-2-3-4.

But i'm curious about your answer. What does it mean?

[chrisbis]

Sorry Ophis,

i was thinking u meant the way the Furthest and the Recent split bets
were presented in the tracker.

I'm finding, because the Tracker lists the splits in the trigger order, or the order in which the tracker found them, that i occasionally miss one of the splits to bet on, even I KNOW that there are eight bets to place, I'm checking the total number by looking at my total bet value on the casino's interface/skin.

It must be just me.
We messaged about it the other day, and U said U would have  to make up
an algorithm or something like that!

Can U maybe show the split bets in another formate if the ascending order function is too difficult to do??

[F_LAT_INO]

One more thing.

FLAT you said that when playing recent-flat then when you encounter Trigger then double your bet only for 1 spin.--YES

###
What about if after that 1 spin (win/lose) you got another (new) trigger. You still betting 2 units? YES.....ITS DESCRIBED IN MY ATTACH.

#A. Or going back to 1.--NO...ALWAYS BET 2...WIN/LOSE

#B. If you are going back to 1 after loss with 2 how long do you wait before betting 2 units again?

#C. If you are staying at 2 then can it be said: Every new trigger=double bet amount?--YES


#A
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (1u?)
W 1u
...


#B
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (1u?)
L EVEN NEWER TRIGGER (still 1u?)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (can I finally have 2u?)
...


#C
...
L 1u
L 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u)
W NEW TRIGGER (2u?)
L EVEN NEWER TRIGGER (2u?)
W 1u
L TRIGGER (2u?)
...


Which one is correct.

[ophis]

They will be now in ascending order....

[chrisbis]

Wonderful.

If I was a woman, I would now asking if I could have ur babies.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
but im not, so Wonderful will have to do for now,
or at least until after the sex change operation. !

[albertojonas]

I will be working today on a tracker so I have few questions.


*should I remove Furthest
*do we still waiting for 9 sectors to appear
*should tracker list 4 recent as soon as you have 4 unique sectors?
*should tracker list proper sectors instead of "F" (5261 instead of F/R)
*should sectors be listed ascending?
*should sectors have format 1-2-3-4 or 1234. (In listing/results)

this makes bet selection volatile.

In my humble opinion, we got carried away and with so many tweaks and alterations, the bet selection lost his power and so the system lost its virtue.

Just my 2cents
Respectfully,
Alberto

[F_LAT_INO]

Alberto mate,

I respect your two cents,but to test something throughouly
this should be the only way.After all anybody can test as prefered,
but since am playing this for real cash,believe me that this could be
the best for all.We shall see.

[albertojonas]

Alberto mate,

I respect your two cents,but to test something throughouly
this should be the only way.After all anybody can test as prefered,
but since am playing this for real cash,believe me that this could be
the best for all.We shall see.

I respect it and agree we must test it throughouly.
In fact i've been testing this marty approaches on the testing thread as you know. I believe they are the most profitable we can find, as prooved there. In this way i tested different mods, for recent, furthest, strict rulles, loose rulles, etc.
No arm. Just feel that the tests for this mods are too young or little compared to the steady 3 years original version.
;-)

[F_LAT_INO]

Agree with you,but since 3 years version I have in my little finger,
and personaly wish to test the opposite,especially this rolling recents
on flat bet basis.So far the recent uniques seems to work much better then
furthest back uniques,cause didn't have losing session as yet.
Once you start to bet on recent uniques indicates that sleepers are waking up.
Maybe to early for any conclusions as yer.will see.

[ophis]

Agree with you,but since 3 years version I have in my little finger,
and personaly wish to test the opposite,especially this rolling recents
on flat bet basis.So far the recent uniques seems to work much better then
furthest back uniques,cause didn't have losing session as yet.
Once you start to bet on recent uniques indicates that sleepers are waking up.
Maybe to early for any conclusions as yer.will see.

I personally don't like to bet on sleepers, but if anyone want to play furthest please use version 1.2.1 of the tracker.


New version 1.3 will be designed to play on Recent Flat betting.

It will include:
- current Profit/Loss
- lowest/highest profit
- list of L/W
- units to bet

I may include MOD with marty if necessary.

Flat do you need anything else included to help your testings?