PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[sarif]

where is the link please i want to try it

[F_LAT_INO]

Clear as Mud that one F LAT INO.

Just one thing-
in all your wins, you have a minus sign next to the amount- bit confusing do you think?
See example-
[attachimg=#]

[/quote

Chrisbis mate,

Am aware of it,but I am used to put the dash in between W or L and amount.
In future will do it without it cause of confusion.

[F_LAT_INO]

Gents,

Wonder if any of you are still testing this?

Or maybe you haven't any time cause of playing it.

Anyhow here is another atachm.and it seems that

marty recents with strict rules is doing the best job.

[ophis]

Gents,

Wonder if any of you are still testing this?

Or maybe you haven't any time cause of playing it.

Anyhow here is another atachm.and it seems that

marty recents with strict rules is doing the best job.

I am working on tracker but don't have much time now.
I want to implement autorun of all modifications at once on the same set of numbers to check which is performing better.

I Love the idea of flat bets with 2u on trigger.

Grind is not a problem for me. Small bankroll is.

[LeoLeo11]

Hi, gents!(my first post here)

I'm feeling, that all gents wait the new tracker to keep testing the last modifications of the system! :)

One of the rules(just my opinion) on flat betting is missing some virtual losses, first!(I mean after a trigger),. . . something like LW track on -/+ but at start betting, only!

I wonder, How much according statistics(tests), the system hit at first time(immediatly) or second time after the trigger?!

. . . some virtual losses, first may safe even any reasonable progression!(just an idea, based on the statistics, of course)
. . . and one could prefer risk missing one or two wins(when occur), but safe his bankroll, for example! If wins occur immediatly and miss, wait the next trigger!

Well, but How much eventually are the reasonable virtual losses, first?! I just, have not enough tests on the system up to now!
How much losses are registered max on the tests after a trigger?!( . . . I think, 9 losses at one test back)

This system is a really promised system! I whish good luck to all members! :thumbsup:


P. S.  It's my 3rd learning language too, all corrects are welcome. . . !

[ophis]

Hi, gents!(my first post here)

I'm feeling, that all gents wait the new tracker to keep testing the last modifications of the system!

One of the rules(just my opinion) on flat betting is missing some virtual losses, first!(I mean after a trigger),. . . something like LW track on -/+ but at start betting, only!

I wonder, How much according statistics(tests), the system hit at first time(immediatly) or second time after the trigger?!

. . . some virtual losses, first may safe even any reasonable progression!(just an idea, based on the statistics, of course)
. . . and one could prefer risk missing one or two wins(when occur), but safe his bankroll, for example! If wins occur immediatly and miss, wait the next trigger!

Well, but How much eventually are the reasonable virtual losses, first?! I just, have not enough tests on the system up to now!
How much losses are registered max on the tests after a trigger?!( . . . I think, 9 losses at one test back)

This system is a really promised system! I whish good luck to all members!


P. S.  It's my 3rd learning language too, all corrects are welcome. . . !

Hi Leo. welcome to the forum 

About LW methology...
i must say that what i have observed you cant determine after how many L start to bet virtual.

Its winning anyway 

Tracker is in beta tests now.

[F_LAT_INO]

Hi, gents!(my first post here)

I'm feeling, that all gents wait the new tracker to keep testing the last modifications of the system!

One of the rules(just my opinion) on flat betting is missing some virtual losses, first!(I mean after a trigger),. . . something like LW track on -/+ but at start betting, only!

I wonder, How much according statistics(tests), the system hit at first time(immediatly) or second time after the trigger?!
Leo,
You can check up my last 3 attachements and find it all there./color]
. . . some virtual losses, first may safe even any reasonable progression!(just an idea, based on the statistics, of course)
. . . and one could prefer risk missing one or two wins(when occur), but safe his bankroll, for example! If wins occur immediatly and miss, wait the next trigger!

Well, but How much eventually are the reasonable virtual losses, first?! I just, have not enough tests on the system up to now!
How much losses are registered max on the tests after a trigger?!( . . . I think, 9 losses at one test back)

This system is a really promised system! I whish good luck to all members!


P. S.  It's my 3rd learning language too, all corrects are welcome. . . !

[LeoLeo11]

Hi Leo.  welcome to the forum  :thumbsup:

About LW methology. . .
i must say that what I have observed you can't determine after how many L start to bet virtual.

Its winning anyway 

Tracker is in beta tests now.

Hi, Ophis!
It might be something on averge about LW, that players not to miss too often wins and at the same time to safe risk on the progression especially or on flat, no meaning!
I'll try to check out  tests and the attachments about this point!

Thank you for the efforts with the tracker versions!!!

[LeoLeo11]

Leo,
You can check up my last 3 attachements and find it all there. /color]

Hi F_LAT_INO!
Thank's for the attachments, I'll check all of them!
Thank you very much for the nice system!
As I know you have worked too much on it!!!  :thumbsup:

[Twisteruk]

Flats System IS No1 !

[attach=#]

[F_LAT_INO]

Flats System IS No1 !

[attach=#]

Interesting,but with my testings it is
marty 5 steps,that didn't lose a session as yet.
Its early to bring any conclusions,and after all
I have one more version of this bet,but when we
throughouly test this one.

Leo,
Ophis is the one that put great amount of work on this.

[Twisteruk]

I'm Testing "Recents with a Trigger"


Will update laters  

[Twisteruk]

=============================
Mode: MOD4 - Recent (2)
20/11/2010
19:18:22

Spins: 83
Bets: 26

Wins: 26
Loses: 26
PROFIT: 112
=============================

SPIN ::	NUMBER ::	SECTOR ::	R    ::	L/W	PROFIT
001	33	9
002	28	7
003	33	9
004	29	8
005	17	5
006	2	2
007	6	3
008	27	9
009	1	1
010	3	3
011	0	0
012	32	8
013	15	6
014	0	0
015	2	2
016	33	9
017	9	3
018	24	6
019	12	3
020	18	6
021	11	2
022	35	8
023	31	7
024	24	6
025	4	1
026	32	8
027	7	1
028	5	2
029	20	5
030	10	1
031	22	4
032	36	9	1459	L	-8
033	3	3		L	-16
034	11	2	2349	L	-8
035	35	8		L	-16
036	9	3		W	10
037	20	5		L	-8
038	31	7	3578	L	-8
039	18	6	3567	L	-16
040	18	6	3567	W	20
041	14	5	3567	W	20
042	29	8		L	-16
043	15	6		W	10
044	24	6		W	10
045	25	7		W	10
046	17	5		W	10
047	7	1	1567	L	-8
048	31	7	1567	W	20
049	25	7	1567	W	20
050	1	1	1567	W	20
051	26	8		L	-16
052	4	1		W	10
053	11	2		L	-8
054	36	9		L	-8
055	2	2		W	10
056	21	6	1269	L	-8
057	10	1	1269	W	20
058	32	8	1268	L	-16
059	16	4	1468	L	-16
060	34	7		L	-16
061	32	8		W	10
062	34	7		W	10
063	3	3	3478	L	-8
064	13	4	3478	W	20
065	20	5	3457	L	-16
066	19	4	3457	W	20
067	0	0	3457	L	-16
068	36	9	3459	L	-16
069	10	1	1459	L	-16
070	20	5	1459	W	20
071	5	2	1259	W	20
072	4	1	1259	L	-16
073	36	9	1259	W	20
074	4	1	1259	W	20
075	10	1	1259	W	20
076	21	6	1269	W	20
077	31	7		L	-16
078	12	3		L	-16
079	3	3		L	-8
080	17	5	3567	W	10
081	6	3	3567	L	-8
082	14	5	3567	W	20
083	25	7	3567	W	20

=============================

[ophis]

I love this pseudo flat betting.

you can post graph with details  


Seems like i see small error LW/profit columns should be 1 up.

[LeoLeo11]

About LW methology. . .
i must say that what I have observed you can't determine after how many L start to bet virtual.

Its winning anyway 

Ya that's funny :twisted:, and not so much, at the same time! I could say "the same story" about almost all systems!

I hope, F_LAT_INO  5 step marty will not fall!

Nice profit Twist!