PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[Boo_Ray]

1 more question... What do you mean with.. No retracking... When do you continue without retracking..

[Compa]

No mate. its NOT CLEARLY Explained at all.

It is VERY Complicated explained. If it would had been CLEARLY explained, this thread would had been only a couple of posts long.

And fully explained in the First Post without any Aattachements. A system with an attachement is at most equal to a very Complicated BetSelection;)

Cheers!

[F_LAT_INO]

1 more question... What do you mean with.. No retracking... When do you continue without retracking..

Meaning not tracking 9 new sectors,but continue
tracking after each spin.

[F_LAT_INO]

No mate. its NOT CLEARLY Explained at all.

It is VERY Complicated explained. If it would had been CLEARLY explained, this thread would had been only a couple of posts long.

And fully explained in the First Post without any Aattachements. A system with an attachement is at most equal to a very Complicated BetSelection;)

Cheers!

Compa mate,
It is very simple once you get acquaint with it--and you will find it very
interesting--hopping profitable.

[dennisbelle]

When you win but you are still behind in units do you go back 1 step in the progression for your next bet?

[F_LAT_INO]

When you win but you are still behind in units do you go back 1 step in the progression for your next bet?

Yes,and you can see it from attachment posted
of WIESBADEN yesterday actuals.

[F_LAT_INO]

Yes,and you can see it from attachment posted
of WIESBADEN yesterday actuals.

btw-will daily post Wiesbaden results--and will
explain why this method wins on the long run-but after we find out
it first.

[dennisbelle]

"btw-will daily post Wiesbaden results" 

This should be interesting seeing your results!  Thanks for posting this method of play.

[GLC]

btw-will daily post Wiesbaden results--and will
explain why this method wins on the long run-but after we find out
it first.

F LAT INO,

Thank  you very much for sharing this method of playing roulette with us.  Your 40 years experience can save a lot of us many years of going over the same trails you have traveled down.  In todays world, we don't have much respect for the knowledge acquired by our elders and, therefore, waste a lot of time going over the same ground.  I have a good feeling about this system and want to really sink my teeth into it.

I think I understand everything about the system, but would like to ask a few questions.

1.  How important is it to track until all 9 of the sector have hit before beginning betting?

2.  I notice that most of the time on a win if you're not plus, you go back 2 steps in the progression.  A couple of times only 1 step.  Is this just arbitrary or do you use a signal, gut feeling, etc...?

3.  Is covering all 3 dozens and all 3 columns the most important part of the trigger to bet?

4.  If so, why play 4 sectors instead of 3?  With 3 sectors you have a lose 6 or win 12 ratio.  Seems like it may work better.

5.  You said that you could use 5 sectors which is lose 10 win 8.  Is this equal to or worse than using 4 sectors?

6.  Have you ever played this on-line or on an airball roulette wheel?

Well, I think that's enough for now.  I'll be eagerly awaiting your reply.

Thanks for all the time you're spending teaching us this system.

Regards,
George

[GLC]

F.

I just tested my 1st session.  It took 40 spins to finally hit all 9 sectors.  But once I did things happened exactly as your examples.

I was shooting for +100 units and I ended up with +108 units.

The session took 101 spins from start to finish.

I had 62 possible bets once I had my 9 sectors until I was up +108.

I had 31 No Bet spins and 31 bets.

The most I had to bet was 24 units.

I won 17 of the bets and lost 14 of the bets.

I lost the 1st two bets for -16, but after that I was never in the hole again.

A relatively easy session I would say.  Just the kind I like.  Too bad it was for testing and not real money.  Soon I hope.  Depends on how you answer some of the questions I asked.

It does take some time to play even when you already have the spins printed out on paper.  I'll post more as I get time to test.

Happy so far,

George

[Boo_Ray]

GLC
thing with progression... I think he goes to a step where next bet would give him atlest +10 profit

[F_LAT_INO]

F LAT INO,

Thank  you very much for sharing this method of playing roulette with us.  Your 40 years experience can save a lot of us many years of going over the same trails you have traveled down.  In todays world, we don't have much respect for the knowledge acquired by our elders and, therefore, waste a lot of time going over the same ground.  I have a good feeling about this system and want to really sink my teeth into it.

I think I understand everything about the system, but would like to ask a few questions.

1.  How important is it to track until all 9 of the sector have hit before beginning betting?
Not so important,but just to know when to start.

2.  I notice that most of the time on a win if you're not plus, you go back 2 steps in the progression.  A couple of times only 1 step.  Is this just arbitrary or do you use a signal, gut feeling, etc...?Am not so graet in maths,but am aiming 10 or more +

3.  Is covering all 3 dozens and all 3 columns the most important part of the trigger to bet?
It is the most important part of this method--will be explaining it late.


4.  If so, why play 4 sectors instead of 3?  With 3 sectors you have a lose 6 or win 12 ratio.  Seems like it may work better.Wrong my friend--will explain this also.

5.  You said that you could use 5 sectors which is lose 10 win 8.  Is this equal to or worse than using 4 sectors?Actually it would be similar bet,and one would bet almost each spin--it would be like a dozen&column bet 20 numbers,and require larger BR

6.  Have you ever played this on-line or on an airball roulette wheel?

Well, I think that's enough for now.  I'll be eagerly awaiting your reply.Only land live casino.

Thanks for all the time you're spending teaching us this system.

Regards,
George

Hi GLC,
Glad that you are interested in this method,maybe we could even improve it
some,I hope.When I first come on this idea it was with 3 sectors,2-1 bet-but of
27 possibilities to bet,only 6 of these where that would be covering all doz-col.
159--168--267--249--348--357--long wait for a trigger and very dangerous to play
as other 6 sectors could alternate among each other for long to empty your BR very quick.So come on this idea of 4 sectors with the same rules--36 possible betting triggers in 126 combinations.And now will show you why it hardly lose.

SPINS            TRACKING                   TRIGGERS

1-32                    8
2-5                      2
3-18                    6
4-33                    9                  
5-4                      
6-34                    
7-12                    
8-23                    
9-19                                                    2689----next spin no bet
10-25                  7-erase spin 6                           same
11-10                  1-erase spin 5                           same
12-20                  5-rease spin 8                          same
13-6                    3-erase spin 7                           same
14-13                  4-erase spin 9
So here we come to the situation where 5 last sectors have alternated with each other--which happens often in NO BET MODE--which means that our sectors are sleeping,and are soon due to wake--which also often happens.And the beauty of this is that these things are happening harmonicaly.
15-29                   8-erase spin 1-         2679  --covers all doz-col-is our next first bet


What is to be noticed here;furthest 3 of 4 our betting sectors havent spun for 15 spins--and
to lose our BR--these would have to sleep for next 10 spins.
The fact is that the ball drops in one of the dozens or columns.Right.Or zero
and when we here have all it covered-partialy-and we know it can not miss our doz-col always expecting possible hit.You will get acquinted with these zig-zag balanced behaviour through testing it.Must hurry to write down todays Wiesbaden,but am afraid wont be able to send the results before tomorrow morning cause of other obligations today.color]

[GLC]

F_LAT_INO,

Just finished another test session, 27.06.2010, table 3, Wiesbaden.

Once again my win goal was 100 units.

Total session including tracking was 216 spins.

Tracked for 22 numbers to get a hit on all 9 sectors.

194 plays after tracking.

53 bets placed.

24 Wins.

29 Losses.

Units won = +100.

Still going well.  Only about 25% of the spins qualified to bet.  Won 45% of the bets placed.  I think 43% is what should be expected.  That means the progression contributes to the win.  A flat bet would have been at -5 units.

Only had 5 losses in a row 1 time.

Largest bet was 40 units.

Largest drawdown was -146 units.  I had won +54 units before this so net drawdown was on -92 units.

Overall not too difficult of a session, although 216 spins is a fair amount of time invested.  I guess for $5 units, that's $500 for about 6 hours play.  I was down almost that much at my lowest loss point.  I can live with that.

I know I still have a lot to learn, so I'll continue to test and am looking forward to your reports also.

It's early in my testing so I'm not sold on it yet.  I'm putting a lot of stake in the fact that you attest to having won with this system for 3 years.  I'm waiting for the inevitable losing sessions to see how that effects my heart rate.

lol,  George

[F_LAT_INO]

Hard session 28 06 with Weisbaden numbers--but still
come some in plus.

[GLC]

F.

I tested the same numbers as you did for June 27, but I came up with different results.  I may be doing 1 thing wrong.  So I have a question.

When you say to erase repeated sectors, do you mean that there should only be the 9 active sectors to choose from and we pick the 4 furthest back.  This would mean that to have 9 unique sectors we might have to look back 20 or more spins.

G