G.U.T-Extensions

[winkel]

Some examples

spin ##   0    1    >1                    
20   18   23   10   4
21   20   22   11   4
22   35   21   12   4
23   34   20   13   4
24   26   20   12   5
25   26   20   12   5
26   17   19   13   5
27   4   18   14   5
28   25   17   15   5
29   28   16   16    5

at spin 29 we find a first crossing
at spin 25 we have 20 12 5 average would be 19/18 14/12 5/6 so we have 2 "0" slow
since spin 25 we have 4 "0" in a row but we expect til spin 37 only 6 "0"
so it is a risc to bet this crossing

[winkel]

Coups   spins   0   1   >1
1   8   36   1   0
2   1   35   2   0
3   14   34   3   0
4   6   33   4   0
5   7   32   5   0
6   22   31   6   0
7   18   30   7   0
8   12   29   8   0
9   33   28   9   0
10   32   27   10   0
11   20   26   11   0
12   29   25   12   0
13   25   24   13   0
14   34   23   14   0
15   32   23   13   1
16   2   22   14   1
17   2   22   13   2
18   9   21   14   2
19   20   21   13   3
20   27   20   14   3
21   25   20   13   4
22   26   19   14   4
23   14   19   13   5
24   15   18   14   5
25   7   18   13   6
26   20   18   13   6
27   26   18   12   7
28   27   18   11   8
29   8   18   10   9

First crossing not on "0" but on "1"
spin 25 is ok
"0" stuck for 6 times
"1" hit for 4 times in a row
6 "0" to appear, non already appeared. 8 spins remaining for this.

would you bet the "1"?

[winkel]

These were two examples of a doubt-situation.

No matter what you had done (one had won and  one had lost) what do we do with it?

As I mentioned before, we will always win/lose like the odds are.

16 "0" will win 16/37 and lose 21/37
10 "1" will win 10/37 and lose 27/37

so what ever our decision was we note in our diary the result like this:

spin 29 Bet 16 "0" result: W or L
spin 29 Bet 10 "1" result: W or L

every time we find a same situation we will check our diary.
e.g. our diary shows 5 L in a row we will bet that now a W is due and revers.

simply: we bet on the odds which have to appear due to the normal distribution

as there is not much interest or questions I will stop an donly answer questions.

br
winkel

[winkel]

Final version for now I think. Bet for 32/number_count on trigger, after that, if same trigger happens again, bet again. Trigger is if there is one more or same of numbers with less hits than those in a higher group. Groups: 0 vs 1, 0 vs 2+, 1 vs 2+. If there are more triggers in one spin, always start bet that with highest sum of count numbers. It might happen that several bets run at once, that might be still a problem. If there is already a trigger running, and a new appears, should I stop playing the old one and play that new? Or run them together?

quoted from here: link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/roulette-theories-new-theory-is-need-it/msg44274/#msg44274

Hi mr. ore,

donÂÃ,´t put this in iron frames!

It always depends on "what is going on"

If two crossings did lose stop the game and restart.
Jump to a winning streak instead of riding a losing one.

br
winkel

[winkel]

Hi Tcs


have you ever read this topic? You should understand and see "What is going on"


br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

Hello, winkle

No I haven't.  I got sidetracked with all that FlAtMaN misery and lost my direction.  I will certainly mark it for reading.

Thanks

Sam

[winkel]

I´m wondering!
I never put another ones strategy down. But many people refer to my strategy and blame it not working or tell it´s too complicated.


It always seems they didn't read carefully.


They didbn´t even notice that I told it only works on straight up not on any other chance.


I told that i checked it on every other chance, but it wouldn´t work.


just my quote


br winkel

[VLS]

Hi Winkel, thanks for taking the time to write your advice on straight-up vs other locations. Some have tried yes. Personally I can only see Splits as a possibility.

It's nice to see you around.

Thank you.

[amk]

W.O.W


Hello winkel!


Didn't think I would ever post on a thread on which you just posted.




How has your playing been going?


Do you use different methods or primarily G.U.T. as you just explained in your last post?

[speed]

I´m wondering!
I never put another ones strategy down. But many people refer to my strategy and blame it not working or tell it´s too complicated.


It always seems they didn't read carefully.


They didbn´t even notice that I told it only works on straight up not on any other chance.


I told that i checked it on every other chance, but it wouldn´t work.


just my quote


br winkel

i think that only one small problem  problem with your strategy is because its only working for you and for nobody else in our Solar System..




just my quote

[Ralph]

It can work very well, specially if we do not stick to the rules all the time. It is a guessing part in it.

[Tomla021]

Gruss Gott --(my version of german) -----I have tried Winkel stuff and not lost----be good  Winkel!

[winkel]

These were two examples of a doubt-situation.

No matter what you had done (one had won and  one had lost) what do we do with it?

As I mentioned before, we will always win/lose like the odds are.

16 "0" will win 16/37 and lose 21/37
10 "1" will win 10/37 and lose 27/37

so what ever our decision was we note in our diary the result like this:

spin 29 Bet 16 "0" result: W or L
spin 29 Bet 10 "1" result: W or L

every time we find a same situation we will check our diary.
e.g. our diary shows 5 L in a row we will bet that now a W is due and revers.

simply: we bet on the odds which have to appear due to the normal distribution

as there is not much interest or questions I will stop an donly answer questions.

br
winkel

Hi folks,


the G.U.T is mainly the idea of "reading spins".


Years ago I started this thread but there was nearly  no interest in it.
Then "I was sold" and I stopped at all because I don´t like to be sold!


All posters complaining that it wouldn´t work neither didn´t read carefully nor understood TCS´s videos nor even asked questions.


If people would have followed they could make 250units in 37 spins.
G.U.T is just the basic of reading "what is going on". I´ve been blamed to much for this phrase.


br
winkel

[GreatGrampa]

Hey Winkel,

Didn't know you are still around. Surprised and happy to see you post. Wanted to really know the master's opinion on

link:://betselection.cc/straight-up/the-finale-crossing/msg14626/#msg14626

[blup_00]

Hi folks,


the G.U.T is mainly the idea of "reading spins".


Years ago I started this thread but there was nearly  no interest in it.
Then "I was sold" and I stopped at all because I don´t like to be sold!


All posters complaining that it wouldn´t work neither didn´t read carefully nor understood TCS´s videos nor even asked questions.


If people would have followed they could make 250units in 37 spins.
G.U.T is just the basic of reading "what is going on". I´ve been blamed to much for this phrase.


br
winkel

Hello mr. Winkel, I have watched TCS's videos and have few questions about your method of playing GUT.
Do you record and bet on crossings like in TCS video, where he also bet on crossings between 2 and >2 and 3 and >3?
And do you use progression or recovery of any kind? Because without those, it can easily happen that we end up with negative BR, like in those videos where TCS used flat betting.
So I tested about 30 cycles of 60 spins and observed few things. First is that it is much safer to bet only on crossings between 1 and >1, as GreatGrampa also observed in his version (but I havent recorded for 2, >2, 3 and >3), where series of losses only once exceeded 5 streak (to 7). But in crossings between 0 and 1 it exceeded 10 times and more regularly. And thats for situations when spins are perfectly good and everything is in boundary's.
So if we only bet on crossings between 1 and >1 and after 3 losses double flat bet on all numbers, all 30 cycles would result in positive balance. But I have only tested 30 cycles and will test more, and you have seen millions for sure. So I would also like for you to decide if I should give up on this theory.

Thank you in advance.