MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

[Johnlegend]

I have seen a 7 Timer, but not 4 Quads in a row.  Infact I've not seen more than 2 Quads in a 5x10 or a 7x7



Opinions !?!?




When you say you have seen a 7 timer.  Do you mean you seen 7 separate triples in a row verticaly?

No twister means one vertical column of seven of the same dozen. Let me put it to you like this. I haven't seen a single vertical column of 8 in 2,100 plus recorded sessions. That's impressive to say the least. Random has a border its the number.7 inside the Matrix. But where the real potential lies is betting against 4 VERTICAL QUADS IN A ROW. Reason you can win several points in a session. I'm not even bothering to test this.

I already know its bullet proof. Twister and Alantis will confirm it. And you can start winning...

[atlantis]

Just played the vertical method of quads forming welll I did 250 spins of a real session and only reached the last progression once and won it.

i play like you said wait for a triple and then bet it for not becoming a quad but I only made 13+ in 250 spins is that few or is it just a bad session ?

If your playing the 4-step prog I'd say it was about right bearing in mind the rarity of the event... So maybe could make the same in half the spins if playing horizontally too...? Could take abt 50-80 spins to make +5 in that case.
Why limit to 7x7? Why not 7x14?

A.

[buffalowizard]

Just played the vertical method of quads forming welll I did 250 spins of a real session and only reached the last progression once and won it.

i play like you said wait for a triple and then bet it for not becoming a quad but I only made 13+ in 250 spins is that few or is it just a bad session ?

Sounds typical enough to me. You reached the last progression already though. I'm wary that one loss would take so long to make back.

[Post]

still what do you all think ? 4 quads after each other does it happen and so how many times i have no clue on that yet ?

[atlantis]

Sounds typical enough to me. You reached the last progression already though. I'm wary that one loss would take so long to make back.

BW, I was basing my calcs on the 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4 prog = 20u max

A.

[Post]

your progression has 8 stages do you think it would even happen 8 quads after each other 

[buffalowizard]

BW, I was basing my calcs on the 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4 prog = 20u max

A.

Cool - hope we all can base our tests on this progression now to see if it claws into the plus more than the minus

[Twisteruk]

BW, I was basing my calcs on the 1-1,2-2,3-3,4-4 prog = 20u max

A.

A, How do you move along that progression ?

[buffalowizard]

Your progression has 8 stages do you think it would even happen 8 quads after each other 

A means 1 on each dozen, 2 on each dozen etc..there are only 4 stages

[Post]

already thought so but still would 4 quads after each other  happen a lot ?

[atlantis]

Your progression has 8 stages do you think it would even happen 8 quads after each other 

Hi Post.
There's only 4 stages.
1,2,3,4
A.

[Johnlegend]

Just played the vertical method of quads forming welll I did 250 spins of a real session and only reached the last progression once and won it.

i play like you said wait for a triple and then bet it for not becoming a quad but I only made 13+ in 250 spins is that few or is it just a bad session ?

Oh you just went 13 up against the unbeatable one, and you call it a bad session. Here is what id do if youve won several times in one or two steps of the progression, common sense should tell you that you're going to be pushed to step three or four soon. What you now do if you want to play 400--500 spins is wait four one quad then start betting. I am so patient I MAY DO THIS ANYWAY. FIVE QUADS IN A ROW? There is more chance of Bill Gates knocking at your door tomorrow and handing you a cheque for $1 BILLION DOLLARS. With the one Trigger stipulation. MATRIX VERTICAL IS THE ONE, ATLANTIS, TWISTERUK what do you think?

[Twisteruk]

On you just went 13 up against the unbeatable one, and you call it a bad session. Here is what id do if youve won several times in one or two steps of the progression, common sense should tell you going to be pushed to step three or four soon. What you now do if you want to play 400--500 spins is wait four one quad then start betting. I am so patient I. MAY DO THIS ANYWAY. FIVE QUADS IN A ROW? There is more chance of Bill Gates knocking at your door tomorrow and handing you a cheque for $1 BILLION DOLLARS. With the one Trigger stipulation. MATRIX VERTICAL IS THE ONE, ATLANTIS, TWISTERUK what do you think?

With the one Trigger stipulation it would be bomb proof imo

5 Quads in a row ?

Ive only ever seen 2

But I do have limited data

[atlantis]

Hi Post,

I can only speak for the horizontals where I bet against triple forming a quad in my test here:

link:://rouletteforum.cc/the-notepad/wait-for-three-consecutive-spins-of-the-same-dosencolumn-system/msg34695/#msg34695


Level One 1-1 (1u on each DOZ)
Level Two 2-2
Level Three 3-3
Level Four 4-4
STOP

Up a level on a loss
If win and behind current recorded bankroll high then stay at same level
If win and level or ahead - restart at level one
If lost at level four - STOP and END SESSION

But if used same thing for the VERTICAL with separate bank scenario you could maybe make some units between them both and quit.

A.

[Johnlegend]

With the one Trigger stipulation it would be bomb proof in my opinion

5 Quads in a row ?

I've only ever seen 2

But I do have limited data

That's how I'm going to play it TWISTERUK. It is very special if we do that Twister. Your progression is safe for thousands of points to every lost bank of 80