MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

[Johnlegend]

U

John legend this system could just really make you a legend you know  

because if it proves to be as good as we think it is and we trust we can just multiply the progression by 10 it wont matter still have al lot of testing to do.

the average is really 1 unit every 100 spins but that could aso become 100 units every 100 spins. I am going to test some more now

Post, the vertical concept is my brainchild but give credit to TWISTERUK AND ATLANTIS TOO. Twister helped me focus and Atlantis suggested betting for and against. I saw the power of just against. Atlantis first noticed the quads potential. I did some homework. And nailed it down. Now we have a method that can make a mockery of random, take an RNG apart and will have mathematicians dusting off their books and scratching their heads. There is no question. This is THE ONE. My experience made me realize that on Monday. Its unbelievable. PATIENCE IS REQUIRED, that will separate the men from the boys...But we gotta test imagine if this gets out..I'm trying to stay humble but I've never seen an RNG dismantled like this 25 real sessions never been beyond bet 3 and am 78/0

[Post]

you are doing nothing wrong but like you saw 7 pointers do happen. I like to bet against 5 quads in a row. first you wait for a quad to appear if so wait for a triple and bet against it becoming a quad if lose wait for another triple.

you use standerd dozen progression 1-1 3-3 9-9   27-27

and if win wait for another quad before betting.

the averge is 1 unit every 100 spins if u use the progression of 80 if it turns out te be as good as we think we just raise the stakes.

[vundarosa]

hey, for those of you that are not playing confined to a 7x7 matrix, reseting and looking for a trigger after every 49 spins, could you please let me know how you're doing it and which progression you're using.

Vundarosa

[irishrob]

You are doing nothing wrong but like you saw 7 pointers do happen. I like to bet against 5 quads in a row. first you wait for a quad to appear if so wait for a triple and bet against it becoming a quad if lose wait for another triple.

you use standerd dozen progression 1-1 3-3 9-9   27-27

and if win wait for another quad before betting.

the averge is 1 unit every 100 spins if you use the progression of 80 if it turns out te be as good as we think we just raise the stakes.

Hi Post,

So you think I'm playing it correctly, I just wasn't too lucky? 

[Post]

I think luck wasnt on your side but try the methode i suggested no luck needed 

[atlantis]

I did some homework. And nailed it down. Now we have a method that can make a mockery of random, take RNG apart and will have mathematicians dusting off their books and scratching their heads

Seems to me a good way to test could be use of a Windows database?

You'd set up the fields first something like this:
#spun. 1st. #spun. 2nd. #spun. 3rd. #spun. 4th. #spun. 5th. #spun. 6th. #spun. 7th.

#spun. would have a cell formula to print a random number from 0-36

The 1st. 2nd. 3rd. series etc... would be filled with comparison formulae to see which doz it belonged to e.g.:
>0 and <13 for doz1 etc... and then print the 1,2 or 3 in the column or 0 if =0 were true.

Then some kind of way to identify quads and triples (by comparing cells above and below) & to highlight and count 'em

You could get results easily for literally THOUSANDS of spins.

It's beyond me I'm afraid, but I am sure someone out there knows how to do this without much trouble either.

A.

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi Guys,

Just did a test using a 7-wide matrix. I had no quad showing until the 13th row down. If I bet there would be no 5th match, I would have won however, I had no betting opportunity until row 17. There I had two triples side-by-side that did not turn into quads, giving me two wins. That was on row 17 down on a 7-across matrix before a win. (Spin 99 & 100)

There must be a way to win MORE than 2-units in a 2 1/2 session but what is it???

I did this test on Bodog.com (RGN) Even finding a triple was difficult.



Scooby Doo

[Johnlegend]

Seems to me a good way to test could be use of a Windows database?

You'd set up the fields first something like this:
#spun. 1st. #spun. 2nd. #spun. 3rd. #spun. 4th. #spun. 5th. #spun. 6th. #spun. 7th.

#spun. would have a cell formula to print a random number from 0-36

The 1st. 2nd. 3rd. series etc... would be filled with comparison formulae to see which doz it belonged to e.g.:
>0 and <13 for doz1 etc... and then print the 1,2 or 3 in the column or 0 if =0 were true.

Then some kind of way to identify quads and triples (by comparing cells above and below) & to highlight and count 'em

You could get results easily for literally THOUSANDS of spins.

It's beyond me I'm afraid, but I am sure someone out there knows how to do this without much trouble either.

A.

Good evening Atlantis, thats a great idea, how about a 10 million spin bot? I really need to get some idea about this babies strike-rate. With the zone I knew roughly. With the MATRIX VERTICAL?? 200/1 500/1....10,000/1----THE HOLY GRAIL OF HOLY GRAILS??? We just don't know...

[Johnlegend]

Hi Guys,

Just did a test using a 7-wide matrix. I had no quad showing until the 13th row down. If I bet there would be no 5th match, I would have won however, I had no betting opportunity until row 17. There I had two triples side-by-side that did not turn into quads, giving me two wins. That was on row 17 down on a 7-across matrix before a win. (Spin 99 & 100)

There must be a way to win MORE than 2-units in a 2 1/2 session but what is it???

I did this test on Bodog.com (RGN) Even finding a triple was difficult.



Scooby Doo

Yes Scooby, it is that's whats special about it. Its got RNG nailed as well as random. I have played 25 real money sessions on an RNG that before ripped every system/method I HAVE EVER SEEN APART. Because they were all designed to tackle the layout DIRECTLY. Exactly what an RNG is designed to oppose.

What an RNGs computer cannot figure out if you snipe bet (ONE WIN SHUT IT DOWN) is that its got to go around 20 cycles of 7 and deliver a dozen in 5 lots of 4 to take your progression.
Its used too people betting directly against the layout.

So as long as you don't allow it time to read you, Its BEATEN...

[Johnlegend]

Hi Post,

So you think I'm playing it correctly, I just wasn't too lucky?  

Irishrob, you're supposed to have the luck of the Irish. No seriously if you want to bet against a single vertical column. BET AGAINST A NINE OCCURRING.

I've never even seen an Eight. So you will require (Heres that word again) PATIENCE to wait for a 5 to form then off you go. Always remember the longer the streak the rarer it is...

[irishrob]

Irishrob, you're supposed to have the luck of the Irish. No seriously if you want to be against a single vertical column. BET AGAINST A NINE OCCURRING.

I've never even seen an Eight. So you will require (Heres that word again) PATIENCE to wait for a 5 to form then off you go. Always remember the longer the streak the rarer it is...

Thanks John for your advise, but would you mind to show me how you play it?

Robert

[F_LAT_INO]

Johnlegend,,
Aprox.-how many betting opportunites could occure
in about 350-400 spins of night B&L session.
Thanks for your unswer.

[ScoobyDoo]

Hey Guys,

This method is getting serious. That being said, I think it is really important for some kind soul to write a program so we can determine the frequency of triples, quads and then anything higher.

This would be invaluable information so we don't have to keep on guessing or assuming that we are right or not. If we are not, we could then adjust the method by taking into account any info that we gleaned.

I think this should done before we go any farther. If it turns out that JohnLegend is right about quads or fivers not appearing within several thousand spins, then FULL SPEED AHEAD!!!

Scooby Doo

[Johnlegend]

Thanks John for your advise, but would you mind to show me how you play it?

Robert

3
3
3
3
3=TRIGGER
3
2=WIN---------USING THE CLASSIC 1,3,9,27 progression. It might be as good (almost) as 5 QUADS. Again to anyone who thinks beating the unbeatable is a drop in win in a few minutes then carry on with your life affair. Think again...One of the reasons the myth exists that roulette is unbeatable in the long haul. Is the humans that play it. They aren't prepared for the LONG WAIT.

I already sense the frustration and impatience creeping in here. Don't let it. Once you realize MATRIX VERTICAL has the game beaten and delivers a strike far beyond the necessary 81/80. You will once you rack up at least 3 betting banks of winnings. Be able to play for two points a win (like I am) Then 3. Up to a recommended 10 max. Remember Casino's have this little insurance policy called HOUSE LIMIT. And with the VERTICAL MATRIX they are going to need it...

[Johnlegend]

Johnlegend,,
Aprox.-how many betting opportunites could occure
in about 350-400 spins of night B&L session.
Thanks for your answer.

Hi F_LAT_INO I don't fully understand your question. What is night B&L???