• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

Started by Johnlegend, Feb 06, 03:00 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

atlantis

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:20 AM 2011
So how many times do you bet on the same line (that it won't continue)?

Are you saying that you just bet once when you have a vertical line of 3 (bet against it becoming a 4), then if that fails, you wait for a new line of 3 to form?

Yep that's it. A Once only bet. A zero breaks the chain and also does not count in the makeup of the triple or quad.
Some are waiting for a new trigger AFTER A WIN.

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:20 AM 2011
So how many times do you bet on the same line (that it won't continue)?

Are you saying that you just be once when you have a vertical line of 3 (bet against it becoming a 4), then if that fails, you wait for a new line of 3 to form?

Perfect Bayes !

Yes mate, you bet on that Trip once that it wont become a Quad.

If it doesn't become a Quad, you win.

If it becomes a Quad you wait for your next Trip.

All Vertical  ;D !


Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

Ok. In that case it seems that the simulations from superman and mr.ore haven't proved that it can't work, so the system may have some merit.  :)
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:33 AM 2011


Ok. In that case it seems that the simulations from superman and mr.ore haven't proved that it can't work, so the system may have some merit.  :)





Agreed  :thumbsup:


Its Set In Stone =)

Twisteruk

Also, a Zero resets that column. In the sense you ignore all previous info in that column prior to the Zero hitting.
Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

As I understand it, you wait for a virtual loss before playing, meaning don't start playing until you have a vertical line of 4 (or longer), then the first bet will be after the next line of 3, correct?

Do you repeat this after every win?
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:38 AM 2011
As I understand it, you wait for a virtual loss before playing, meaning don't start playing until you have a vertical line of 4 (or longer), then the first bet will be after the next line of 3, correct?

Do you repeat this after every win?

Correct.

Yes. That way it takes 5 Vertical Quads to kill you.
Its Set In Stone =)

Bayes

Right, so here is an example of a losing run:

1 3 2 2 1 3 1
2 3 1 1 2 3 2
1 3 2 1 2 2 3
2 3 3 1 2 3 1 <- 1st loss
2 1 2 1 2 1 3 <- 2nd & 3rd losses
3 1 2 1 1 3 2
1 3 2 2 3 1 2
3 1 2 3 1 2 2 <- 4th loss
2 3 1 2 1 3 2 <- 5th loss

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Twisteruk

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 11, 05:51 AM 2011
Right, so here is an example of a losing run:

1 3 2 2 1 3 1
2 3 1 1 2 3 2
1 3 2 1 2 2 3
2 3 3 1 2 3 1 <- 1st loss
2 1 2 1 2 1 3 <- 2nd & 3rd losses
3 1 2 1 1 3 2
1 3 2 2 3 1 2
3 1 2 3 1 2 2 <- 4th loss
2 3 1 2 1 3 2 <- 5th loss



Yes. That is an example of a losin Session

Its Set In Stone =)

irishrob

Quote from: irishrob on Feb 10, 06:31 PM 2011
Am I just not lucky???

Tested 2500 spin from random.org.
Profit is around +40 units, lost -80 units, down to about -40

So what about this one? It was played by the rules.

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Feb 11, 05:34 AM 2011


Agreed  :thumbsup:



I'm now 124/0 after 55 sessions on an Rng I could never beat with the Zone or Original Matrix method. Remember, at the end of the day this thing has to defeat an RNG and live wheel in order for us to profit.
Ive never been taken to the fourth step of the progression ONCE. Ive had four third step bets. And all the rest have been instant wins or second step wins... ;D

Twisteruk

Quote from: irishrob on Feb 11, 06:12 AM 2011
So what about this one? It was played by the rules.


I dont see any Zero's ?


Zero's do shift the data stream along, even just one column, which does make a difference





Its Set In Stone =)

Twisteruk

Quote from: Johnlegend on Feb 11, 06:26 AM 2011
I'm now 124/0 after 55 sessions on an Rng I could never beat with the Zone or Original Matrix method. Remember, at the end of the day this thing has to defeat an RNG and live wheel in order for us to profit.
I've never been taken to the fourth step of the progression ONCE. I've had four third step bets. And all the rest have been instant wins or second step wins... ;D


Yes. Live play or RNG play does generate those types of Result !


Keep it Real people  ;D !!

Its Set In Stone =)

irishrob

Quote from: Twisteruk on Feb 11, 06:27 AM 2011

I don't see any Zero's ?


Zero's do shift the data stream along, even just one column, which does make a difference







That's true.  :thumbsup:

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Feb 11, 06:29 AM 2011
Yes. Live play or RNG play does generate those types of Result !


Keep it Real people  ;D !!


Twister I'm keeping it RNG. Ive always wanted to beat them. Snipe betting has them chasing their own tail. ..Just went 128/0 after 57 sessions. One instant win, and one second step win. I'm trying to complete one betting bank today. 160pts.... ;D

-