MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

[Johnlegend]

Always calm and mellow mate.

Not quite yet, intrigued maybe otherwise I wouldn't spend time on it.

Really! I mean if you claim to have "the method" it shouldn't be a problem playing continuosly should it? I am sure most if not all members/players of RNG would want to play as often and as long as they like.

Like I said earlier, adding extra triggers is just doing so in the hope you miss the nasty that almost caught you once, how do you know you wont get 2 nasties in a row, answer, you don't but if you do will you then add 2 triggers? and bet every 3rd run of 3?

I am running the bot with your miss one bet one method, so far 72 attacks 44 units up, max progression reached 27, 3 times that's the last step of the progression reached, agreed it's not a loss yet but it's close.

Will let it do 200 attackes then post the results for you to peruse, if it fails before then I will post as far as it got.

Superman let's say a bot is closer to an RNG than the physics of a live wheel. I have no doubt if I played the RNG from dawn till dusk it would read me and defeat me. But Matrix Vertical played in a snipe attack isn't allowing the RNG long enough to decode it.

[GLC]

Thanks for your help Superman,

This is the kind of stuff we need.

I always get nervous when we keep adding triggers that take longer and longer to show and we only get 1 unit on a win.  As I said before, we can play all kinds of dozen repeat methods with the four step martingale and win 99% of the time before the 1% chance of loss starts rearing its ugly head.

I have tested 10 sessions to +1 on all 10.  Reached the 27-27 bet once.  All the rest have been won on first 2 bets.  This is just a drop in the bucket, but enough drops and we can fill it up.

We definitely need to see a lot of wins vs losses.

A lot of us are still on the sidelines waiting to see if this pans out.

Here's hoping it does.

George  

[superman]

allowing the RNG long enough to decode it

Do you really believe that statement? do you really think it does try to decode what you are doing? I have tested against casino RNG (where you think they cheat) PHP Random, RXtreme software, C++ Random and random.org the results are similar, to say they are the same wouldn't say much for random, the results are similar the loss/win ratio is the same across the board, we are not ney sayers, we are looking for the same as you are, a winning method.

Reputable casino software doesnt need to cheat

By the way I forgot to ask, if I get 2 qualifiers at the same line, I am betting both when due is that correct? or do you flip a coin use intuition to decide which one to chase after?

[atlantis]

By the way I forgot to ask, if I get 2 qualifiers at the same line, I am betting both when due is that correct? or do you flip a coin use intuition to decide which one to chase after?

Hi Superman,

After a TRIGGER QUAD (nasty) - you keep betting each qualifier until a win (one bet only on the opposite dozens to each qualifying TRIPLE(s)). If you win then the game is reset and you must wait for a fresh TRIGGER QUAD (nasty) and then bet against the next QUALIFYING TRIPLE(s) forming into a QUAD (remember one bet only!)  until a win obtained at which point you can stop or carry on searching for the next TRIGGER QUAD...

A.

[Johnlegend]

Do you really believe that statement? do you really think it does try to decode what you are doing? I have tested against casino RNG (where you think they cheat) PHP Random, RXtreme software, C++ Random and random.org the results are similar, to say they are the same wouldn't say much for random, the results are similar the loss/win ratio is the same across the board, we are not ney sayers, we are looking for the same as you are, a winning method.

Reputable casino software doesn't need to cheat

By the way I forgot to ask, if I get 2 qualifiers at the same line, I am betting both when due is that correct? or do you flip a coin use intuition to decide which one to chase after?

Superman you're. Playing the grid left to right, there can only be one win/loss at a time that's the beauty of the MATRIX, its all there before you to scrutinize. Can true random land on number 36 three times immediately after a player covers numbers 1--35? Come on Superman, that's predatory.

[Twisteruk]

By the way I forgot to ask, if I get 2 qualifiers at the same line, I am betting both when due is that correct? or do you flip a coin use intuition to decide which one to chase after?

This concerns me. Are you playing correctly ?

You can't have 2 qualifiers at the same time to choose from


What you can have is the potential for upto 7 bets (unlikely, but could happen) one AFTER another

But never at the same time

You never have to choose

So, no, we don't flip a coin  

EDIT:

John beat me to it lol 

[superman]

What you can have is the potential for upto 7 bets (unlikely, but could happen) one AFTER another

Thats what I meant. eg

ABCABCA
ABBAABB
ABBBBAA

Here the bot would bet spin 1 then spin 2 of the next 7 spins, correct?

[Johnlegend]

This concerns me. Are you playing correctly ?

You can't have 2 qualifiers at the same time to choose from


What you can have is the potential for upto 7 bets (unlikely, but could happen) one AFTER another

But never at the same time

You never have to choose

So, no, we don't flip a coin  

EDIT:

John beat me to it LoL 

Lol!!!! Yeah but you getting ZERO could be the greatest tweak in roulette betting history. LOL!!!!!

[Twisteruk]

that's what I meant. e.g.

ABCABCA
ABBAABB
ABBBBAA

Here the bot would bet spin 1 then spin 2 of the next 7 spins, correct?

Assuming you have had a Quad before this then,

Yes line 1 is your first bet on B and C

If line 1 wins then line 2 or future lines becomes a wait for a Quad (to kick start the 5 Quads off again)

If line 1 loses then line 2 is the next bet and 3-3 on the progression


bets (in each Vertical column) either win or lose on the first and only bet  

[Johnlegend]

that's what I meant. e.g.

ABCABCA
ABBAABB
ABBBBAA

Here the bot would bet spin 1 then spin 2 of the next 7 spins, correct?

No if it is programmed CORRECTLY, It will REACT to the RESULT of spin 1/BET ONE. I'm not sure you have this method down superman??

[Twisteruk]

LoL!!!! Yeah but you getting ZERO could be the greatest tweak in roulette betting history. LoL!!!!!

History will tell us the answer LoL 


Or Superman in however long it takes to do 20,000 Spins !



don't forget the Zero's people  

[irishrob]

I just let you know guys I'm testing it by the rules now. My results are very similar to yours. Didn't reach the 4th progression yet. Averaging around +1 unit/100 spin.

Would it be difficult to design a software which could make the spins, collect the data, place the bet(s) and exit the session?

[Post]

if it proves to be a winner you can even start with 80 euros and if you have reached 160 euro you double al your bets and within no time you can multiply the

1 bet by 10 and mae a 100 a day  just thining out loud.

[Twisteruk]

I just let you know guys I'm testing it by the rules now. My results are very similar to yours. Didn't reach the 4th progression yet. Averaging around +1 unit/100 spin.

Would it be difficult to design a software which could make the spins, collect the data, place the bet(s) and exit the session?

Thats good to hear mate 


I think Superman is nailing that as we speak !

[Johnlegend]

If it proves to be a winner you can even start with 80 euros and if you have reached 160 euro you double al your bets and within no time you can multiply the

1 bet by 10 and mae a 100 a day   just thining out loud.

Post there is a saying I believe in and adhere to with my money management. "TALK QUITELY BUT WALK WITH A BIG STICK". It translates to gambling as bet to win a small amount but have a powerful BR behind you.

You are forgetting we are using a steep progression here. The way around it is to play two simultaneous sessions on two different sites. Then you can win more points. BUT, as I said yesterday don't rush success. We are beating what most deem unbeatable.

Take it a step at a time. I am risking 160 quid on a well known predatory RNG. LADBROKES NO LESS. IF A METHOD CAN BEAT THAT. It can beat anything. that's why I threw the MATRIX vertical in there. I know this RNG has a habit of reading you like a book in minutes. But its struggling to read the matrix.