• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

MATRIX VERTICAL METHOD ONLY

Started by Johnlegend, Feb 06, 03:00 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

ScoobyDoo

Well, I think I have figured out one thing we have been asking ourselves:

What percentage of the time will one quad appear = 7.29% of the time.

So far I haven't been able to calculate how often four or five quads will show up. I still working on that.

Scooby Doo

Johnlegend

Quote from: ScoobyDoo on Feb 15, 08:29 PM 2011
Well, I think I have figured out one thing we have been asking ourselves:

What percentage of the time will one quad appear = 7.29% of the time.

So far I haven't been able to calculate how often four or five quads will show up. I still working on that.

Scooby Doo
Nice work Scooby we are not worthy... :thumbsup:

Johnlegend

After TwisterUKs bad run on the BV RNG it seems M/V has lost its momentum. A pity as one loss a bad method does not make. I will continue to hunt for the average strikerate. I still believe this method is excellent on RNG although not practical on A live wheel. With Scoobies go ahead I am about to unveil the anwser for a live wheel VERTICAL MATRIX. :ooh: :ooh: :ooh:

ScoobyDoo

SHEESH! I can't believe that one measly lost has frightened everyone away. It's typical though...Everyone is looking for the "NO LOSS" method. Sure that would be great but not too realistic.

All any of you should be looking for is a method that wins more than it loses. To me, that's the Holy Grail as you like to call it.

Scooby Doo

Johnlegend

Quote from: ScoobyDoo on Feb 16, 03:39 PM 2011
SHEESH! I can't believe that one measly lost has frightened everyone away. It's typical though...Everyone is looking for the "NO LOSS" method. Sure that would be great but not too realistic.

All any of you should be looking for is a method that wins more than it loses. To me, that's the Holy Grail as you like to call it.

Scooby Doo
EXACTLY. Overall profit is where its at. Its like running a business there are ups and downs but its longterm turnover we want. There is no such thing as a system that never loses and there neverwill be unless it a special bet. That has so many triggers or waiting involved that it unpractical.

Like if I said "GOT THE GRAIL FOLKS, YOU WAIT FOR 3 QUAD TRIGGERS ON A LIVE WHEEL And bet a whole bunch there won't be 7. You might grow old and die before you lose, but youd get very few bets. We have to find a happy medium. Roulette is easy to beat, BUT HAVE YOU THE PATIENCE????" ???

F_LAT_INO

As I said method that is playable under B&M circumstances
without many virtual spins and long run winner.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

darrynf

is anyone still playing this ?

its not the end of the game if it losses once but i think it has loss more then once.

my system takes losses but i still show profit, one loss after 15 sessions.

sorry about that john, it amazes me that if a system is good people throw it out after a loss.

i dont know this system and i have never keep up with it but i think a system needs to lose to make it a good system.
it shows its real.

Twisteruk

Im still playing  :xd:

Almost back to 2 Banks  ;D
Its Set In Stone =)

darrynf

so its working well for you twister

Twisteruk

Yes, so far

It depends on how often the loss comes

Only time will tell  ;D
Its Set In Stone =)

darrynf

i think time has told you.

do you play for real money ?

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Feb 17, 02:35 AM 2011
I'm still playing  :xd:

Almost back to 2 Banks  ;D
I have yet to lose. I still maintain Twister got read like the daily mirror. The way I play is to play a session, then completely close ladbrokes down for at least 15 minutes. I don't know how Twister snipes. And I'm still no worse than a 4 Quad. I will update my results later. Sniping has to be thorough give the RNG enough time, and it will come up witb 10 QUADS if thats what it takes to beat you. ::) ::)

Twisteruk

Quote from: Johnlegend on Feb 17, 10:59 AM 2011
I have yet to lose. I still maintain Twister got read like the daily mirror. The way I play is to play a session, then completely close ladbrokes down for at least 15 minutes. I don't know how Twister snipes. And I'm still no worse than a 4 Quad. I will update my results later. Sniping has to be thorough give the RNG enough time, and it will come up witb 10 QUADS if that's what it takes to beat you. ::) ::)

Thats how I play  ;)

Though I tend to wait 20 minutes, just to be sure  ;D

Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: darrynf on Feb 17, 03:18 AM 2011
I think time has told you.

do you play for real money ?
Time indeed will tell us the story. I think a strikerate around 200/1 is where its at. I am 205 games, zero losses now with 450 points profit. Apart from last week when I ignored Twisters zero stipulation and put myself in trouble, ive had three 4 Quads.

My ultimate thinking is to use different levels of progression to protect profits. UP to level 3 after a loss, down to level 1 after a 100 wins.  :-X :-X

ZigZag

I love testing/playing all the different Matrix versions and still think this version is the daddy! Just waiting to build up my bankroll to play this on LIVE WHEEL. I know my eyes can go sqaure waiting for a trigger on live wheel but looking though over 1000 spins not seen even a 4 quad yet   :thumbsup:

-