• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

High Low Matrix thought

Started by buffalowizard, Feb 07, 08:12 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Twisteruk

Quote from: buffalowizard on Feb 07, 04:00 PM 2011
No it's fine mate,

it's open to all suggestions. Catching the triple opposite is a really good feeling, and being an EC it all evens itself up
It can be much more mild...

A member from VLS suggests 122 and stop after any win. Profits are less, but probably safer. The thing is with these questions....is it all just relative to the amount your betting?

I.E betting smaller amounts, losing/winning smaller amounts
    betting larger amounts, losing/winning larger amounts?

Cheers

BW



Yes, its all relative.

But for me, IF you have won bets 1 and 2 (+3) why risk ending up -1 if you bet 4u on the 3rd bet ?


Anyway, its horses for courses and all eh ?


Good work bud  :thumbsup:



Its Set In Stone =)

ScoobyDoo

Oops! I guess I was doing it wrong! If "H" was dominent in the three above, I bet "H"......but it's a good thing I did because there was a string of ten "L's" in a row.

Maybe going with the flow would prove to be better, since a string of EC's of six or more happens quite often....just my take on it.

Scooby Doo

Twisteruk

Quote from: ScoobyDoo on Feb 07, 04:13 PM 2011
Oops! I guess I was doing it wrong! If "H" was dominent in the three above, I bet "H"......but it's a good thing I did because there was a string of ten "L's" in a row.

Maybe going with the flow would prove to be better, since a string of EC's of six or more happens quite often....just my take on it.

Scooby Doo


You would be amazed how many times ive seen "do the opposite to the system" and it have similar results !



Its Set In Stone =)

buffalowizard

Yeah scooby

it has crossed my mind to bet for repeats instead. I haven't had time to test it.

BW

buffalowizard

Twister you're right, probably doesn't matter

for every

LLL
LLL

you'll see a

LLL
HHH

I will get round to going through the sessions with stopping after a 1,2 win though. May well cut out those -7 losses, especially in that -64 session

May make GLC shudder a little less!

BW

warrior

how about this parlay
1=1 return 3
2=3            5
3= 6           6  
4=10          6
5=15          5
6=21          3
7=28          0
start over if you lose all 7 take the loss.

Twisteruk

Quote from: buffalowizard on Feb 07, 04:21 PM 2011
Twister you're right, probably doesn't matter

for every

LLL
LLL

you'll see a

LLL
HHH

I will get round to going through the sessions with stopping after a 1,2 win though. May well cut out those -7 losses, especially in that -64 session


May make GLC shudder a little less!

BW


It would be good to see that revisited with that Mod, see if it pans out better  :thumbsup:


You never know, and thats why we are all here to Test and support each other  :)



Its Set In Stone =)

buffalowizard

Quote from: warrior on Feb 07, 04:27 PM 2011
How about this parlay
1=1 return 3
2=3            5
3= 6           6  
4=10          6
5=15          5
6=21          3
7=28          0
start over if you lose all 7 take the loss.

Nice aggression warrior...good returns, will have to be looked into how many 7 losses we have run into

Thanks

BW

buffalowizard

Using a stop after wins on first 1,2 progression

It minimises the hard session, but would it bring some of the winning sessions down to a relative margin also?

HLL
HLH  +3
0HH  -4
HLL   +1
LLL   -6
LLL   -13
LLL   -20
HHL  -17   
HL0  -20
HLL   -25
LLH   -24
LLL   -31
HHL  -28
HHL  -27
LLL   -20
LHL  -23
LLL   -30
HHH  -23
LHH   -28
LLH   -25
LLH   -24
HLH  -21
HLH  -24
HHL  -23
LLL   -14
LLL   -21
LLL   -28
LHL   -31
LHH  -26
HHH  -33
HHH  -40
HHL  -39
HHL  -38
0HH  -45
HHL  -44
HHH  -51

warrior

Quote from: buffalowizard on Feb 07, 04:31 PM 2011
Nice aggression warrior...good returns, will have to be looked into how many 7 losses we have run into

Thanks

BW
how many times it loses 7 and how many times it makes 30 units as a win and walk target.

ophis

original rules. progression 1,2,4.

all results are from real wheels.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

buffalowizard

Thanks Ophis

That closes the door on that one!

Could you run it through a different progression, such as Warriors suggestion?

Many thanks

BW

GLC

Dear Ophis,

You sure know how to liven up a party! :o :'( :'(





In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

ophis

Quote from: GLC on Feb 07, 05:16 PM 2011
Dear Ophis,

You sure know how to liven up a party! :o :'( :'(


:-\ sorry.


Quote from: buffalowizard on Feb 07, 05:06 PM 2011
Thanks Ophis

That closes the door on that one!

Could you run it through a different progression, such as Warriors suggestion?

Many thanks

BW

Progression does not matter. Even if i will make 30 step progression it wont help.


umm. i will may actualy check whats the LLR.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

buffalowizard

What does LLR stand for?

-