The most playable method/system ever written in our forum or any other fourm?

[darrynf]

were all those sessions in 100 spins ?

[GoranNF]

I played like chrisbis, with the constant winning bet and the letwin tracker, and I lost all my money 2 times. First I made good profit, then I would lose it all.. Played on a live wheel. I'm also very interested in this thread. Looking forward to some more replies.

[F_LAT_INO]

Goran mate,
I f you play continously any method without knowing when to stop,you,I,him,her will always lose.You must know when to stop and when restart again.Sometimes I play 7-8 short sessions in one night session.Where are you from,as this name is very popular in my country.

[darrynf]

Goran mate,
I f you play continously any method without knowing when to stop,you,I,him,her will always lose.You must know when to stop and when restart again.Sometimes I play 7-8 short sessions in one night session.Where are you from,as this name is very popular in my country.

thats bullshit, any good system should be able to play back to back, just face this system wont win, it relies on triggers and hoping to get something.

i can play back to back with my system but no one wants a system wins constant so i have taken it off.
but saying you play any system long enuff and you will lose is a copout, if its anygood then it should be able to play as long as you want like my system.
i could understand this system if i wish but why when i already have a system that works good for me.
at lease my system dosent relie on trigers or hopes for something to happen.

[winkel]

that's B.S., any good system should be able to play back to back, just face this system wont win, it relies on triggers and hoping to get something.

......

at lease my system dosent relie on trigers or hopes for something to happen.

Hi darry,

youÃ,´re so vain, thatÃ,´s what make you so ....


Playing back to back is pure ignorance of statisttical phenomenons.

Your System relies on trigger 30spins!
it relies on hopes because (your own words) it is guessing!

What did you write in one of my threads: "I donÃ,´t wish you luck .."

I donÃ,´t wisch you anything. I just wait and watch and will you find crying a like baby, when happened what you till now ignore to be possible.

br
winkel

[ADulay]

i can play back to back with my system but no one wants a system wins constant so i have taken it off.
but saying you play any system long enuff and you will lose is a copout, if its anygood then it should be able to play as long as you want like my system.
i could understand this system if i wish but why when i already have a system that works good for me.
at lease my system dosent relie on trigers or hopes for something to happen.

Hmm, it appears I may have missed a message or two about this system of yours.

Can you point me to it for a looksee?

AD

[darrynf]

Hi darry,

youÃ,´re so vain, thatÃ,´s what make you so ....


Playing back to back is pure ignorance of statisttical phenomenons.

Your System relies on trigger 30spins!
it relies on hopes because (your own words) it is guessing!

What did you write in one of my threads: "I donÃ,´t wish you luck .."

I donÃ,´t wisch you anything. I just wait and watch and will you find crying a like baby, when happened what you till now ignore to be possible.

br
winkel

thats not a trigger, its catching numbers. get it right or stay out.
stats have no meaning in roulette just like math.

you are as expeience as this system

[darrynf]

Hmm, it appears I may have missed a message or two about this system of yours.

Can you point me to it for a looksee?

AD

sorry mate i got it removed, people just dont want to know a winning system and they continue to batter it without trying it.
i give up, i wish to no longer tell my system any more. its not one i have told on any forum but am tired of hearing bad comments or remearks to try and put me down.

there were some genuine people but i think i will practice my sessions more and continue to win.
heres another winning session.


Session 1
11   
5   
5*   
2   
34   
17   
8   
27   
24   
2*   
13   
19   
9   
2*   
21   
25   
11*   
29   
0   
8*   
32   
32*   
34*   
32*   
19*   
34*   
17*   
1   
15   
13*   end of the 30 spins
17 repeats and 19 new numbers.


No bets
24   r+    n-
Bet repeats (as you can see the numbers are less in repeats)
Bets @ $1 unit, bankroll $300
1,2,5,8,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,24,25,27,29,32,34
9   r+   n-   win +$19   no bets, b.r $319
7   n+   r-   no bets
0         no bets   
25   r+   n-   bet new numbers
Bets @ $1 unit
3,4,5,6,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,23,26,28,30,31,33,35,36 (Iââ,¬â,,¢m betting 19 numbers)
0   loss -19      (would off won if I covered the zero as a repeat, oh well)
No bets, b.r $300
18   n+   r-   bet repeats
Bet @ $1 unit
1,2,7,8,9,11,13,15,17,18,19,21,24,25,27,29,32,34
25   r+   n-   win +18      b.r $318   bet repeats
Bet @ $1 unit
1,2,7,8,9,10,13,15,17,18,19,21,24,25,29,32,34
The reason Iââ,¬â,,¢m betting repeats is because the pattern is showing repeats hitting twice in a row for now.
30   n+   r-   loss 17, bet for repeats      b.r $301
Bet @ $1 unit   
1,2,7,8,9,10,13,15,17,18,19,21,24,25,29,30,32,34
7   r+   n-   win +18      b.r $319   bet new number
Bet @ $1 unit
3,4,5,6,10,12,14,16,20,22,23,26,27,28,31,33,35,36
26   n+   win +18      b.r $337    bet repeats
Bet @ $1 unit
1,2,7,8,9,11,13,15,17,18,19,21,24,25,26,29,30,32,34
0   loss -19      b.r $318    bet new number
Bet @ 2 units
3,4,5,6,10,12,14,16,20,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
9   r+   loss -34      b.r $284   bet new number
Bet @ $4 units
3,4,5,6,10,12,14,16,20,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
30   r+   loss -68      b.r $216   bet new numbers
Bet @ 8 units
2,3,4,5,6,10,12,14,16,20,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
14   n+   win +144   b.r $360   bet new numbers
Bet @ $1 unit
2,3,4,5,6,10,12,16,20,21,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
30   r+   loss -18      b.r $342   bet new numbers
Bet @ $2 units
2,3,4,5,6,10,12,16,20,21,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
19   r+   loss -36      b.r $306   bet new numbers
Bet @ 4 units
2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12,16,20,21,22,23,27,28,31,33,35,36
19   r+   loss -76      b.r $230   bet new numbers
Bet @ $8 units
2,3,4,5,6,10,12,16,20,21,22,23,27,28,29,31,33,35,36
20   n+   win +136   b.r $366   bet repeats
Bet repeats @ $2 units (Iââ,¬â,,¢m covering less with repeats and repeats hitting more at the moment)
1,7,8,9,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,24,25,26,30,32,34,
15   r+   win + 38   b.r $404   bet repeats

If need to be then change to what has less numbers to cover, its not a rule to stay at one.
Bet @ $2 units
1,7,9,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,24,25,26,30,32,34
11   n+   loss -32      b.r $372   bet repeats
Bet @ 4 units
1,7,9,11,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,24,25,26,30,32,34
0   loss -68      b.r $304   bet repeats
Bet @ 8 units
1,7,9,11,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,24,25,26,30,32,34
26   r+   win +152   b.r $456   bet repeats
Bet @ $2 units
1,7,9,11,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,24,25,26,30,32,34
20   r+   win +38      b.r $494   no bets

you can chose to believe me or not, i no longer care, i stop to have a break.

[frost]

I donââ,¬â,,¢t play @ B&M casinos Iââ,¬â,,¢m more of a RNG.

I think JL 7x7 matrix is a really good idea. I posted an idea that came to me yesterday while reading the turbo matrix thread (I think it was that one)

me personally i donââ,¬â,,¢t believe in stop/loss and Iââ,¬â,,¢m in agreement with darryn f that if a system is any good you should be able to play it continuously

But i disagree with his trigger statement. All systems need triggers otherwise what are you following and when do you bet?

But my vote in this thread is the 7X7 matrix. I think it genius because we are looking at the random results and trying to put them in order.

You cannot put random in order, therefore there must be a way to exploit this. Thatââ,¬â,,¢s where my idea came from.

But yea, JL 7x7 for me...

[darrynf]

what i said is that i dont relie on a trigger, winkel thinks my yrcking of numbers is a trigger which is not.
reason why is trigger are the same thing all the time, they never change. now a trigger say is wait for losses or vitaul wins, then in that case i guess i do have teiggers but they are never the same, i can chose to place bets when i want, i dont need triggers.

the reason i disagreed was that when i track 30 numbers is this always changes so i dont believe its a trigger and i dont usualy throw a bet down after i have done my tracking.

hi thomas, you might be able to find it by asking one of the admin, its up to you.
anyway the system i thought wasnt good is from flat_, a system should win without stop/loss and should be able to play back to back.
and when i guy uses different names then for me thats a red flag.

i dont expect anyone to believe me and i no longer care but i will say what i wish and i know i put a bad vibe on when i first came on and i did say i was sorry but it seems that dosent matter.
just because i wish not to understand flats system dosnet mean my system is shit, people dont want another system better then theres so they always try to find something to pick or dont think a system can win constant.

flat_ said his system losses 1 out of 30, i dont believe it cause 1 guy said he lost his moneytwice and what about other people, i didnt see anyone saying they were winning money all the time.

[darrynf]

i dont come on here trying to mock people and systems, i did have a talk on flats_ thread and i didnot once put him or his system down, but he came on my thread and put my system down. so now i no longer care and will say what ever.

i always get ask dumb things from winkel, it makes me think hes not that experience.

i did say sorry now i no longer care what you think,your system uses over 1000 units bankroll then quit when you are up 100 units, 10% of your b.r.
whos going to risk a b.r to gain 10%
my system will beat yours hands down every time and make more with a lower b.r.

im sick of people putting something down unless they try it.
im sorry if im been harsh or i come of arogant, im not usualy like this but maybe i deserve it but it dosent mean im going to take.

if you want to debate then bring up valid points, not something a kid would say.

[albalaha]

Good Job guys. Atleast a few systems are nominated now. Winkel's GUT theory, F_lat I_no' s CWB, JL's 7X7 marix method and darrynf's own method. Anybody else would mind suggesting any other?

[darrynf]

Good Job guys. Atleast a few systems are nominated now. Winkel's GUT theory, F_lat I_no' s consistent winning bet, JL's 7X7 marix method and darrynf's own method. Anybody else would mind suggesting any other?

mate my system isnt on here any more so it might not be idea to have it here.

did you by anychance catch my method before i got it removed ?

[albalaha]

Hey darrynf,
       I have seen your system. Why did u delete it if u were having so much success? Bring that again in full system but let me advise you one thing-- please be polite with everyone. It will cost you nothing.

[darrynf]

Hey darrynf,
       I have seen your system. Why did you delete it if you were having so much success? Bring that again in full system but let me advise you one thing-- please be polite with everyone. It will cost you nothing.

yeah i know mate, i came on abit negative so i guess i deserved it.

i deleted it cause i no longer care what people think, nothing to negative on it but no one wants to hear about a winning system and i dont think you can code it.