• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The most playable method/system ever written in our forum or any other fourm?

Started by albalaha, Feb 15, 03:33 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

furple

This is from one of his many posts.

''People that's ALL about to change, TWO OF A KIND can be grasped by a 10 year old. It is THE HOLY GRAIL for that reason as well as its astonishing profit to loss/recovery ratio. It doesn't require a degree in math to understand it. I've seen it All in my 20+ years experience with this game. I've seen nothing like TWO OF A KIND. It flows with random instead of asking it to do something. You will see..."

MrJ

Watch us big doggs, the MEN, play at a REAL casino, on a REAL table. All we ask is that you stay out of our way. The rest? Bots, airball, RNG...that's more for the Kitty Kat Klub. Its the big doggs and the kittens!! Winning is not an event, it's a process and it takes YEARS and YEARS to master > link:://:.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2014127/rs_560x415-140227131132-1024.bulldog-kittens3.jpg... To be great, you have to be willing to be mocked, hated and misunderstood.

furple


albalaha

good to know but may be I should see it thoroughly myself before commenting.

Johnlegend

Quote from: albalaha on Mar 26, 02:03 AM 2011
good to know but may be I should see it thoroughly myself before commenting.
Albahala TWO OF A KIND was overhyped I myself will admit that. It isn't my creation but I tested it and promoted it. That said with the Tweak, its one of the best and most understandable methods I've ever seen.

PATTERN BREAKER on the other hand is my baby. And its AWESOME. Il tell you that straight. It has proven itself to me over the last three years. I'm done after this one. Theres only so much testing, debating you can do. There comes a point where you have to have the intelligence to realize.

NO METHOD IS PERFECT. BUT, does it have such a good strikerate, that when it does lose, its merely a small setback? that's MY DEFINITION OF A HOLY GRAIL *OUTSTANDING PROFIT TO LOSS RATIO*

TEMPLATE 7, Does. Your buy in is 170 odd units for a method that can have winning streaks in excess of 200/1 garnering 4-5 units per win more if the ZERO hits.

MATRIX VIRTICAL QUAD, Does. Your buy in is 80 units with a trigger 242 without. For a method with as yet an UNKNOWN strikerate. As its never lost. I have data that indicates its strikerate to be in the 1000s. It wins 1 unit per win.

And PATTERN BREAKER, YOUR BUY IN IS *14* units. that's where it leaves those other two betting miracles in the dust. Next Friday I drop it on the forum.

SAKIS

Thanks Johnlegend.....we cant wait to see your system working !!!!!!!!!!!!!

albalaha

Offcourse Johnlegend,
          It would be a great gift and if it works the way you say, you will be "John The Legend".

jon86

Quote from: Johnlegend on Mar 26, 07:08 AM 2011
Albahala TWO OF A KIND was overhyped I myself will admit that. It isn't my creation but I tested it and promoted it. That said with the Tweak, its one of the best and most understandable methods I've ever seen.

PATTERN BREAKER on the other hand is my baby. And its AWESOME. Il tell you that straight. It has proven itself to me over the last three years. I'm done after this one. Theres only so much testing, debating you can do. There comes a point where you have to have the intelligence to realize.

NO METHOD IS PERFECT. BUT, does it have such a good strikerate, that when it does lose, its merely a small setback? that's MY DEFINITION OF A HOLY GRAIL *OUTSTANDING PROFIT TO LOSS RATIO*

TEMPLATE 7, Does. Your buy in is 170 odd units for a method that can have winning streaks in excess of 200/1 garnering 4-5 units per win more if the ZERO hits.

MATRIX VIRTICAL QUAD, Does. Your buy in is 80 units with a trigger 242 without. For a method with as yet an UNKNOWN strikerate. As its never lost. I have data that indicates its strikerate to be in the 1000s. It wins 1 unit per win.

And PATTERN BREAKER, YOUR BUY IN IS *14* units. that's where it leaves those other two betting miracles in the dust. Next Friday I drop it on the forum.



I cant wait for this John  ;D ;D

Realy looking forward to see what you have this time after the Best Matrix Verticale  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Jon

ZigZag

Quote from: Johnlegend on Mar 26, 07:08 AM 2011

And PATTERN BREAKER, YOUR BUY IN IS *14* units. that's where it leaves those other two betting miracles in the dust. Next Friday I drop it on the forum.


Like the look of this one  ;D

albalaha

Hey John,
       U have aroused too much curiosity amongst us. Now, finalise and publish the method as soon as possible.

Johnlegend

Quote from: albalaha on Mar 28, 12:46 PM 2011
Hey John,
      you have aroused too much curiosity amongst us. Now, finalise and publish the method as soon as possible.

The method has been set in stone for three years Albahala. Its on here Friday night. In terms of risk, reward, and strikerate. It has no match. All your doubts, dreams, possibilities will be anwsered with this one.

Naysayers will disappear off the radar. Because THEY'LL KNOW. This does what MATHS FORGOT TO REMEMBER. When too much emphasise was put on what random could do. They forgot WHAT ITS VERY POOR AT DOING.

jon86

Quote from: Johnlegend on Mar 30, 05:07 PM 2011
The method has been set in stone for three years Albahala. Its on here Friday night. In terms of risk, reward, and strikerate. I has no match. All your doubts, dreams, possibilities will be anwsered with this one.

Naysayers will disappear off the radar. Because THEY'LL KNOW. This does what MATHS FORGOT TO REMEMBER. When too much emphasise was put on what random could do. They forgot WHAT ITS VERY POOR AT DOING.


I will not sleep until friday  ;D

albalaha

Dear Johnlegend,
         Your claim is too tall. Do u think you will make out for the expectations of forum members?

Johnlegend

Quote from: albalaha on Mar 30, 10:53 PM 2011
Dear Johnlegend,
         Your claim is too tall. Do you think you will make out for the expectations of forum members?

YES! ive been telling people to think outside of the layout for sometime now, its the only way you can own roulette longterm. MATRIX VERTICAL does this very well. And puts random into a playground, where its keeper THE LAW OF AVERAGES. Keeps it in line.

PATTERN BREAKER sets random another test that it fails TOO OFTEN. The reason Im making a big noise about this one is THE BUY IN.

14 POINTS for a SYSTEM that can roll up 15 times in 20 games. I will show you once and for all how easy roulette is to own. ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND RANDOMS WEAKNESSES.

Mathematicians have always been WRONG about roulette. Its time to start the shift in thinking. It will take years and remain a specialist game. Just as formula one is in sport.

But I KNOW ABSOLUTELY some very famous people have been responsible for instilling negative and defeatest attitudes in otherwise intelligent and open minded thinkers.

My goal is to show those who arent completely swallowed up in the myths surrounding this game what is REALLY POSSIBLE. Not THEORETICALLY STATED.

Normy2000

nOrMy2o0o  ‹(•¿•)›
"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning."  Albert Einstein

-