• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

MATRIX VERTICAL APPLIED To LINES

Started by eureka, Mar 27, 07:16 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bettingking

Depending on the system I sometimes risk higher units early then reduce units to protect profit.

shazwad

Been betting every spin then +1 on a loss but staying at that until reach new high. Short sample played 5 games between 100-150 spins. Highest bet +7 .
Averages about 10 singles per 100 spins, 3-4 doubles and twice saw quad.

Bettingking

Yes i use that progession on many systems also as long as it doesnt get too deep!

RouletteGhost

Looking forward to more updates

I'm trying to think how to tweak this

To a maximum 2 step progression never beyond that
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

for the guys playing every single spin against the DS 6 spins back, as you know the progression in post 1 is crazy

i have not seen 3 losses in a row playing every single spin, so that progression has not failed, but it will happen

+1/-1 looks ok?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

50 spins, about 1 hour at airball wheel...i say airball wheel because i probably wouldnt play this on live

PLAYING EVERY SPIN against the above outcome

656360 
316655  WWLWW
452615  WWWLWL
151353  WLWWWW
564156  WWWWLW
412136  WWWLWL
315622  WLWWWW
421534  WWWWWW
26          WW
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLAYING ONLY VERTICALLY AFTER A DOUBLE, against it becoming a triple. The good stuff


656360 
316655 
452615  W (col 3)
151353  W (col 4)----W (col 6)
564156  W (col 2)
412136  W (col 5)
315622  W (col 4)----W (col 6)
421534  W (col 2)
26         

My conclusion: obviously the 2nd test was better. if a bet was lost, a progression for the next trigger would even out the play

original poster was definitely onto something with ONLY betting after a double vertically....each trigger was a win in one hour of play, +8 units

to me it is fascinating to have a method where each and every trigger is a winning bet

this cannot be overlooked
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

surprisingly enough, the double vertically trigger does not take that long to hit
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

shazwad

Betting every spin. When get a loss, divide the loss by 3 as usually get back even within 3 spins. Look at the W/L ratio. If wish to be more aggressive, divide the loss by 2. If get another loss, rinse and repeat.

Bettingking

Ok RG, how about betting the opposite so everyspin hoping for a REPEAT on the previous above 6 outcomes. Would that be +11?  :thumbsup:

Bettingking

Ok can count now....actually +13  :thumbsup:

RouletteGhost

I thought about that to

Most lines have a loss

So if you bet for a repeat it could work

A single DS progression is very mild to

You can play every spin for a repeat from above and when you have 2 doubles vertically you can play against it. So you can play both ways at the same time
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Here is a single double street progression

It is no martingale. Pretty mild

I'm not saying to do this or not to do this. But here it is if you bet for an above repeat

Bet amt.....win amount
1..............05
1..............04
1..............03
2..............07
2..............05

3..............08
4..............10
5..............11
6..............11
7..............10

9..............13
11.............14
14.............18
18.............24
22.............26

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

On previous tests I've seen it go beyond 15 misses so might have to rethink it

Drawn back to betting against doubles because it seems very stable
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

I will say. Betting against a triple forming vertically is one of the most stable bets I've ever Seen. Even more stable than Lankys matrix.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

mogul397

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 20, 11:03 PM 2017
surprisingly enough, the double vertically trigger does not take that long to hit

For all the spins you had to wait for two betting ops above, it would
seem to be. I count 1 minute a spin.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

-