MATRIX VERTICAL APPLIED To LINES

[eureka]

Another session :
82 spins / one hour
11 W all @ 1st step

So from the beginning :

Step 1 : 32 W
Step 2 : 2 W
Step 3 : 0

315 spins

[Post]

how about just using 2 steps of the progression 1-6 and if lose try to recover with 2-12 total risk 105

[eureka]

What do you think of a 2 steps prog, as it is seems very rare to go 2nd step? Is it too early to talk about it?

We could bet 25, 150 ... BR needed 875

It would return 250 units per hour...

And take 35 wins to recover (3 hours) in case we go over step 2.

Let me know please what you think.

[Post]

boatran i just posted a idea on using only 2 steps of progression  what do you think ?

[eureka]

Sorry Post I didn't see you posted about that  

Indeed that's nice because we might bet more near table limits (10 or more per line)...

Let's see what others think but I think we still need more testing...

[eureka]

I wish one could go to the third step

[Post]

Boatroan how much units do you think you make an hour with 1-6 progression ?

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi Guys,

Just did a test on RGN. (That's All I Have)

Results:

106 Spins

Won +11

No Losses

Went to the Third Level of the Progression Twice

Scooby Doo 

[eureka]

Boatroan how much units do you think you make an hour with 1-6 progression ?

On a slingshot airball live wheel like the one at Paddy or Ladbrokes, you get 84 spins an hour on average.

From the beginning of my testings, i make 10 units on average every 84 spins...

So it's 10 units per hour.

[eureka]

Hi Guys,

Just did a test on RGN. (That's All I Have)

Results:

106 Spins

Won +11

No Losses

Went to the Third Level of the Progression Twice

Scooby Doo 

Hi Scooby,

ahhh RNG... I think personnally you wouldn't have gone over step 2 on a live wheel.
I just want to underline you went twice to third step in 100 spin with your RNG.

Within my 300 spins on an airball, I just went twice to second step.

BTW do you remember how many times you won by step 2 ?

Thanks

[Post]

boatran with this system the  progression 1-6 total 35 is worth the risk dont you think ?

[atlantis]

Just wondering why we're not using the MATRIX 7 here instead of a MATRIX 6...
Ok - so there is 6 numbers to track instead of 3 - but what reason for reducing to a grid of 6?
Or is it because we're hunting against VERTICAL LINE TRIPLES as opposed to VERTICAL DOZ QUADS?

A.

[eureka]

Boatran with this system the  progression 1-6 total 35 is worth the risk don't you think ?

Well, I too would prefer a 2 steps prog as the third one really goes up and annoy us to bet high stakes.

Would you go for a recovery of 2, 12 if it fails for a total of 105 ?

You'd recover within 18 wins...

Or would you start from scratch ?

[eureka]

Just wondering why we're not using the MATRIX 7 here instead of a MATRIX 6...
Ok - so there is 6 numbers to track instead of 3 - but what reason for reducing to a grid of 6?
Or is it because we're hunting against VERTICAL LINE TRIPLES as opposed to VERTICAL DOZ QUADS?

A.

Atlantis,

I would say that is because there are six lines and thus it optimizes random. Of course you can widen the matrix but you'll get less opportunities I think.

Sorry if it seems not clear but that's logical to me.

Maybe others would give other enlightment...

[Post]

I think i would use the progression 1-6 and 2-12 to recover just because you wouldn't need a big stake to bet