MATRIX VERTICAL APPLIED To LINES

[eureka]

I think I would use the progression 1-6 and 2-12 to recover just because you wouldn't need a big stake to bet  

Well I'm still waiting for someone to get 3 triples in a row. And to know how many spins they got to this...

Just to see if it worth it. In that case, I'll bet like 10, 60 and 20, 120 in case I need to recover (18 wins).

That would make 100 units per hour... Enough for me  

Edit : GOT IT

[Johnlegend]

Atlantis,

I would say that is because there are six lines and thus it optimizes random. Of course you can widen the matrix but you'll get less opportunities I think.

Sorry if it seems not clear but that's logical to me.

Maybe others would give other enlightment...

No harm in experimenting with different grids. Once I have 1,200 spins I'm going to run them through a FIVE AND SEVEN WIDE GRID. To see how they compare. Here are my results for my first 50 GAMES...

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 50
TOTAL GAMES WON 50
BALANCE PLUS 60 POINTS
STRIKERATE 100%

STEP 1 WINS 36
STEP 2 WINS 12
STEP 3 WINS 2

STAKING PLAN
LEVEL 1=5X1-PLUS 1
LEVEL 2=5X7-PLUS 2
LEVEL 3=5X40 BREAK EVEN

THE GOOD NEWS, I'm giving this method the ultimate test LADBROKES RNG, and its holding up. No snipe betting just PLAY...

I will update when I reach 100

[Post]

just did 100 spins 19 wins first step wins and then bust
I played the 2 progression 1-6

223645
314644
12564Bust

[eureka]

No harm in experimenting with different grids. Once I have 1,200 spins I'm going to run them through a FIVE AND SEVEN WIDE GRID. To see how they compare. Here are my results for my first 50 GAMES...

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 50
TOTAL GAMES WON 50
BALANCE PLUS 60 POINTS
STRIKERSTE 100%

STEP 1 WINS 36
STEP 2 WINS 12
STEP 3 WINS 2

STAKING PLAN
LEVEL 1=5X1-PLUS 1
LEVEL 2=5X7-PLUS 2
LEVEL 3=5X40 BREAK EVEN

THE GOOD NEWS, I'm giving this method the ultimate test LADBROKES RNG, and its holding up. No snipe betting just PLAY...

I will update when I reach 100

It seems to me more and more clear that RNG takes you more inside the prog than a real wheel.

If we look to your results, you go 12 times to step 2 for 36 to step one what is a 1/3 ratio. Plus you go twice to third step.

My testings on real wheel shows 2 wins at step 2 for 30 wins at step 1 and none at step 3. Step 2/step1 = 1/15 which is 5 times higher than the rate step2/step1 on ladbrokes RNG.

[eureka]

Just did 100 spins 19 wins first step wins and then bust
I played the 2 progression 1-6

223645
314644
12564Bust

Ohhh you played live or RNG?

You have to recover now... and maybe go for a 3 steps prog next time

[Johnlegend]

Just did 100 spins 19 wins first step wins and then bust
I played the 2 progression 1-6

223645
314644
12564Bust

Two steps is not enough. I Think 1 Trigger and the three step progression for an RNG On a live wheel I think that would be near invincible or a ridiculous strikerate...

[eureka]

Two steps is not enough. I Think 1 Trigger and the three step progression for an RNG On a live wheel I think that would be near invincible or a ridiculous strikerate...

If I understand you well John, do you suggest a trigger plus a three steps prog even on a live wheel ?

Thanks

[Johnlegend]

It seems to me more and more clear that RNG takes you more inside the prog than a real wheel.

If we look to your results, you go 12 times to step 2 for 36 to step one what is a 1/3 ratio. Plus you go twice to third step.

My testings on real wheel shows 2 wins at step 2 for 30 wins at step 1 and none at step 3. Step 2/step1 = 1/15 which is 5 times higher than the rate step2/step1 on ladbrokes RNG.

Its always harder to beat an RNG Boatran8, afterall its MANMADE GENERATED RANDOM, so it will produce odd suspicious results compared to a live wheel...

[Johnlegend]

If I understand you well John, do you suggest a trigger plus a three steps prog even on a live wheel ?

Thanks

Lets wait and see how it holds up on a live Boatran8 ON AN RNG? Yes, that third step is being tested too often for my liking when you consider 240 odd points are on the line. I think we need that security Boatran8.

[Post]

it were live spins my results but i recovered within 200 spins and was up 20 when ended

[eureka]

It were live spins my results but I recovered within 200 spins and was up 20 when ended

Ok. I have not yet seen a third step live within 400 spins now. But even if it could happen, you may recover within 160 spins or less betting 2, 12.

Well, I'm biased between a 2 levels prog with 2 steps or a 3 steps... on live wheels

[eureka]

72 spins

7 W all @ 1st step

[eureka]

I have done a SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS by the members who posted and who have played on a LIVE WHEEL.

So until now:

1019 spins

1 step : 134 wins
2nd step : 5 wins (3,6%)
3rd step : 1 (0,7%)    (by Post. He was using a 1, 6 prog and recovered with a 2, 12 in 200 spins).

So I would say that a 2 level prog : 1-6 and 2-12 is ok.

The second level recovers in 18 wins.

So if we consider the present stats, net profit would have been more than 100 units. about 10 units per hour betting 1 base unit.

You can play higher stakes and earn 100 per hour.... rather safely with a 2 levels prog.

Remember, it only went once to the third step within more than 900 spins. So I think the 2 levels prog is ok (on a live wheel). 1-6 and 2-12 in case we need to recover.

Your opinion ?  

PS : please continue posting your results. We need them to validate the betting system.

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi Boatran8,

All my wins were on the first step except for the two times i went to the third step...no second steps. Keep in mind guys....These were RGN spins. I have no access to live wheel. I am here in the U.S.

Scooby Doo

[eureka]

Hi Boatran8,

All my wins were on the first step except for the two times I went to the third step...no second steps. Keep in mind guys....These were RGN spins. I have no access to live wheel. I am here in the U.S.

Scooby Doo

I think then that if you want to play on RNG you need at least 3 steps, maybe 4 or a trigger + 3 steps but it could be hard to get a triple trigger and you'd miss opportunities...
You'd really move from the US