• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*MATRIX VERTICAL 5* (Randoms BLACKHOLE)

Started by Johnlegend, Mar 29, 04:47 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Thanks Ricky

This is with a 1 2 4 progression? Looks like it hasn’t busted yet.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

sentinel3

Quote from: Ricky on Feb 15, 05:03 PM 2018
Hi RG,
programmed correctly in a bot and it shows PB is a winner. No other system I have tested with proper MM rules and detailed method rules has come close to the success I am seeing in playing thousands of continuous spins in simulation mode.

Regards,
Ricky
Although i dont believe in Bots Ricky. This is cementing my feeling about PATTERN BREAKER REVISED.

It may be virtual affordable playable HG. Right under their noses on the forum. As always though only a very few with be willing to play it.


ice789

Quote from: Ricky on Feb 15, 05:03 PM 2018
Hi RG,
programmed correctly in a bot and it shows PB is a winner. No other system I have tested with proper MM rules and detailed method rules has come close to the success I am seeing in playing thousands of continuous spins in simulation mode.

Regards,
Ricky

pls share rx code

Ricky

Quote from: ice789 on Feb 16, 02:19 PM 2018pls share rx code
Hi Ice789,
I will be sharing a version of my system with just the PB and MV7 next week. I just need to clean up the code for public consumption and take out some of the complexities I have been coding to make it easier for the novice to read and use without  getting flooded with too many technical questions.
I will post it in the PATTERN BREAKER thread

Cheers,
Ricky

Tinsoldiers

Just by looking at the graph Ricky, I can sense a problem with your code. I can be wrong. Look at your wins. It seem to double count and somehow account the win in the following spin after a win as well. 

Ricky

Quote from: Tinsoldiers on Feb 17, 12:43 AM 2018
Just by looking at the graph Ricky, I can sense a problem with your code. I can be wrong. Look at your wins. It seem to double count and somehow account the win in the following spin after a win as well.
Hi Tin Soldiers, I'm not sure what you mean by double counting? FYI this graph is generated by Roulette Xtreme in realtime while the results come in. I find it very accurate.
cheers,
Ricky

Tinsoldiers

Quote from: Ricky on Feb 17, 05:39 AM 2018
Hi Tin Soldiers, I'm not sure what you mean by double counting? FYI this graph is generated by Roulette Xtreme in realtime while the results come in. I find it very accurate.
cheers,
Ricky
Ok

jesus69

Hello all,

I came across this system a few months ago and was curious to see how it performs.

I have done testing on more than 50k spins on live roulette, and I have to say this system does work but you need the patience to win.

I have created a bot for those who are interested. It is pretty complicated to make a bot for a system like this but I have managed to do it and It took me a while. If you are interested pm me. expresso324@gmail.com

Cheers


daveylibra

Hi Ricky

I would be interested in seeing the rx code, if it's not too cheeky of me to ask.
I could then run it spin by spin to see if its ok, then do further tests on auto.
It may also help me to learn the rx coding!
Regards
Dave

moles40

Quote from: sentinel3 on Feb 07, 08:28 AM 2018
Code 4 didnt hold up over time Viking. It started well but began to find too many losses. 80 units is a big risk. And recovery is hard.

If you want a good double dozen/column system I suggest you check out Apolloos TWO 4 ONE system.

Its only an 8 unit risk and holds up very well.

You said code 4 was the greatest thing ever,although risking 80 units to win 1 unit,how could it ever be.

Always seemed more sensible to play for the pattern as less risk to start with


Or just write down any pattern of columns and dozens and bet one of the patterns hits in the next four spins,waiting a certain amount of spins makes no different.

Ricky

Quote from: daveylibra on May 16, 10:32 AM 2018
Hi Ricky

I would be interested in seeing the rx code, if it's not too cheeky of me to ask.
I could then run it spin by spin to see if its ok, then do further tests on auto.
It may also help me to learn the rx coding!
Regards
Dave
Hi Daveylibra,
apologies for delayed response. My current version of my system is quite complex. I am currently reformatting it to make adding new systems more flexible. But you can get an old version of the PB and MV7 code with most of the complexity stripped out in one of my old posts. Just check my profile and look for my attacchments. You will see one with a zip file of the system. Let me know if you can't find it.

Cheers,
Ricky

stranger90

I play Matrix 4 wide and bet on trips not become quads on auto-roulette and it's unbreakable. 3 step progression, 1-3-9, if I lose it I leave but I make it back very fast 20-30 units in 500 spins, about 4-5h.
Betting on quads not to become fivers is not worth the waiting plus I have seen 7 fivers in a row, if I would have not been betting on the trips which came in the middle of them I would have lost two times there.

stranger90

I wonder how is John Legend doing?  I would think he was tweaking this method and trying others till busted his bank

-