• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*MATRIX VERTICAL 5* (Randoms BLACKHOLE)

Started by Johnlegend, Mar 29, 04:47 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

strato1985

albertojonas you really got small man syndrome

your getting angry over that, its says at Page 1 who's forged this method

and you've probably only dismissed the method as rubbish so what are you talking about.

Your credibility is going down by the post


esoito

Quote from: albertojonas on Jun 04, 11:16 AM 2011
I do not know why john legend claims this system as his...

what a fake!

Man up.
>:(

On page 1 we read:
"...And ultimate INVINCIBILITY. We know since ATLANTIS, TWISTER and myself first forged this METHOD."


Alberto, we've got a word-meaning issue here. They did NOT fake anything.

The word "f or  g e d" can, indeed, mean "faked".

But as English is not your first language you were obviously unaware the word also has about six different meanings!!

In this instance the word "f or  g e d" means "to come up with an idea, plan,  explanation, theory or principle, after a mental effort" (WordWeb Version 6.3)




wizzard.tim

John Legend congrats for this system.


Playing it with 5wide matrix and guess what! --I've never lost. Not a single time!!

If only I could find a bot (until Ophis makes one) I'd never close my PC and I'd make a fortune.  :smile: The bot would use "Matrix 5","Matrix 5 (H&L)" and "Pattern 4". It would be a roulette killer. One idea that I came up after playing for so long, is that the maximum times a Low or a High came up consecutively was 7 times.. So when i see 7 times a Low/High one after another, I start betting high stakes with a progression..

It would be a good idea if Ophis made a bot which would automatically place bets on live roulette when something (an even bet,a dozen,a column) comes up 7 times consecutively and start betting with a progression.

Keep playing for so long only  your systems and I have good results. I like them cause they're simple.

strato1985

i've seen about 20 high numbers follow one after the other

wizzard.tim

Quote from: strato1985 on Jun 05, 07:34 AM 2011
I've seen about 20 high numbers follow one after the other

Bad news...still, we could make a trigger that the bot starts to bet after the 13th consecutive High/Low.. that could take long, BUT if we never turn off the bot and if we use the same trigger for all even bets..then we would have an account that is constantly forever winning money, while you can do whatever else you wish..
The rarity of the winnings vanishes if we have a bot for each live casino, running all the time in one pc from our home..the idea is becoming rich without any effort..the most promising bot..using a 7th step progression..

Dont you think it is possible?

If you make such a bot, pleeeease remember me ;)

albertojonas

Quote from: esoito on Jun 04, 11:59 PM 2011
On page 1 we read:
"...And ultimate INVINCIBILITY. We know since ATLANTIS, TWISTER and myself first forged this METHOD."


Alberto, we've got a word-meaning issue here. They did NOT fake anything.

The word "f or  g e d" can, indeed, mean "faked".

But as English is not your first language you were obviously unaware the word also has about six different meanings!!

In this instance the word "f or  g e d" means "to come up with an idea, plan,  explanation, theory or principle, after a mental effort" (WordWeb Version 6.3)





i am sorry for the misunderstanding. posted that under an angry mood after being cursed.
Sorry.
:(

Halba1

Quote from: albertojonas on Jun 05, 04:00 PM 2011
i am sorry for the misunderstanding. posted that under an angry mood after being cursed.
Sorry.
:(

i am fully in support of albert jonas, I have to agree he has made some valid points especially: with pointing out the risks of pattern 4. I did some testing, and there are a few repeats of H/l, R/B, so it can be risky, especially with large progressions. this is because there are only 8 different combinations, and that's a high chance of getting a repeat.


of course, a high strike rate 90%+, but it only takes 1 or 2 bad ones to knock your confidence down. high % strike rate only good if the other 10% of time you lose, you don't lose much.

i haven't tested vert .5 yet though.

Johnlegend

Quote from: Halba1 on Jun 05, 05:12 PM 2011
i am fully in support of albert jonas, I have to agree he has made some valid points especially: with pointing out the risks of pattern 4. I did some testing, and there are a few repeats of H/l, R/B, so it can be risky, especially with large progressions. this is because there are only 8 different combinations, and that's a high chance of getting a repeat.


of course, a high strike rate 90%+, but it only takes 1 or 2 bad ones to knock your confidence down. high % strike rate only good if the other 10% of time you lose, you don't lose much.

i haven't tested vert .5 yet though.
Halba, If something has to win 7 times to break even at a one level progression. And it will win around 12 times played hit and run. There is little risk. MATRIX VERTICAL 5 is the most solid method on this forum. The problem is it takes time to mature. Played on dozens and columns its is unmatchable. But there is no certain betting frequency. Its truly random you must wait for random to deliver the trigger. CODE 4 is a worthy compromise. It can rival MATRIX VERTICAL 5 for strikerate with a certain betting frequency making it live casino friendly. Online I will still play MV5. Because it simply cannot be defeated by random. OVERALL its the best thing I have ever played.

Johnlegend

Quote from: Johnlegend on Jun 16, 04:51 PM 2011
Halba, If something has to win 7 times to break even at a one level progression. And it will win around 12 times played hit and run. There is little risk. MATRIX VERTICAL 5 is the most solid method on this forum. The problem is it takes time to mature. Played on dozens and columns its is unmatchable. But there is no certain betting frequency. Its truly random you must wait for random to deliver the trigger. CODE 4 is a worthy compromise. It can rival MATRIX VERTICAL 5 for strikerate with a certain betting frequency making it live casino friendly. Online I will still play MV5. Because it simply cannot be defeated by random. OVERALL its the best thing I have ever played.
Overall this is still the best method I have ever seen or been involved with. Its only drawback was TIME. It could be used online and will always work. But for our Amercian friends who don't have the freedom to bet online it wasn't very playable in a B&M casino. Unless you could be satisfied with a few wins a session.

That said TIME is always the sacrifice for a grail like method. Although I haven't used it in a year. Its never left my mind. I still believe the MATRIX VERTICAL CONCEPT. Is indeed randoms tamer. But the challenge is to find a more accessable playable version. That can rival MATRIX VERTICAL 5s strikerate. I think I've got something approaching it.

Viking64

Currently considering playing two systems together simultaneously. Maybe PB3 and CODE4. That'll be some spreadsheet if I can make it work!

sentinel3

Quote from: Viking64 on Feb 07, 03:54 AM 2018
Currently considering playing two systems together simultaneously. Maybe PB3 and CODE4. That'll be some spreadsheet if I can make it work!
Code 4 didnt hold up over time Viking. It started well but began to find too many losses. 80 units is a big risk. And recovery is hard.

If you want a good double dozen/column system I suggest you check out Apolloos TWO 4 ONE system.

Its only an 8 unit risk and holds up very well.

Viking64


RouletteGhost

Quote from: sentinel3 on Feb 07, 08:28 AM 2018
Code 4 didnt hold up over time Viking. It started well but began to find too many losses. 80 units is a big risk. And recovery is hard.

If you want a good double dozen/column system I suggest you check out Apolloos TWO 4 ONE system.

Its only an 8 unit risk and holds up very well.

I like that you are honest. No BS. Admitting code 4 suffered too much

That’s why I believe in this PB because you have been playing it for so long.

I’m not worried about bot tests for million spins, I’m worried about real world play

I’m liking this
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

sentinel3

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 07, 10:15 AM 2018
I like that you are honest. No BS. Admitting code 4 suffered too much

That’s why I believe in this PB because you have been playing it for so long.

I’m not worried about bot tests for million spins, I’m worried about real world play

I’m liking this
RG i never pretend something works. I have to pay bills with these systems. PB is the most consistent playable system ive ever found.

MATRIX VERTICAL 7 I believe is the closest thing to a HG. But you need super patience. Might take 100 to 150 spins to get the WIN. But win it does.

And now Im playing two other systems with success. Atlantis's 3 strikes. And Apolloos T4O.

Whether they hold up for years I dont know..but theyve started well.

PB and MV7 have proven themselves to me over several years. Im always looking for other systems to have 4 great ones in my bag...


Ricky

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 07, 10:15 AM 2018I’m not worried about bot tests for million spins, I’m worried about real world play
Hi RG,
programmed correctly in a bot and it shows PB is a winner. No other system I have tested with proper MM rules and detailed method rules has come close to the success I am seeing in playing thousands of continuous spins in simulation mode.

Regards,
Ricky

-