Multiple system triggers

[GLC]

Guys, I am interested in looking for a method of playing roulette where we take bet selection methods and using triggers we jump from 1 system to another.

Let's talk about Even Chance bets.  We take a system, determine what spin sequence causes it to lose.  Then we take another system and determine what causes it to lose, etc...

Example is the system I published using the Author of The Monte Carlo Anecdotes system of betting Same-Opposite-same-opposite-same etc...  We bet a 4 step cheated martingale or 1-2-3-6  The only was to lose, not counting zeros, is if we enter a series of doubles on the wrong step in which case we lose every bet.

Then we create a system where we bring together 3 or 4 systems and switch between them in a way that we miss some of the losing sequences?

I was thinking of a trigger system.  If we see an extended sequence of doubles, that's a trigger for us to play the Author's method. 

If we have a few of these systems, we can wait for triggers such as above, play that particular system until we see another trigger for one of the other systems and then switch to it, etc...

I think by doing this, we might actually be able to miss losses and we don't have to miss too many losses before we have a winning method of play.

We can play this way flat betting while we are waiting for our quads and five pointers to form in our matrices.

If only 1 other person thinks this a viable concept, let me know and we can exchange ideas.  Two minds working on a problem is always better than one.

Geo

[seykid31]

Hi Mate
Dont know much of trigger E/C because to me E/C can get crazy.But as i recall you play more Airball.one thing that you can notice and use as trigger is repeats.I am tracking by using repeats,using a square page i put number 1 then the first number,2 next number,3 and so on.When i get my first repeat i put a small number 2,beside the same repeat..ok,e.g better.I track using a 3 colour ball point,Red Blue Black,Black -spin,Blue-number out,Red-repeat notification

1.00
2.21
3.1
4.36
5.5
6.13
7.15( not by these numbers i start playing small stakes on street 1 unit each on 1,5,8,12 look at numbers and see why,american wheel and and 5 units on Red dominating,so 9 units)
8.32( win  on red +1 unit)
9.34 (win on red and line + 12 units)
10.8 L
11.21 R2(FIRST REPEAT) W on red,these small stakes just to keep me in game,as airball machines limited at times.
12.34 R2(i put number 2,to know twice we have this number)
13.16 w on red and line +12 units
14.24 L
15.31 L

Any way my point here is on airball,when you get 2 repeats,and interval 8 numbers in between,i find it good to play those numbers between the repeats as numbers clusters,from numbers repeating.But check your airball spins first.Dont know why,but the spins tend to repeat a lot and cluster.This is when i start attacking,the small stakes are just to keep me in game.
Hope you get my views.
Seykid.

[Proofreaders2000]

Winkel's Great Universal Theory and Mr. Chips Four Selecta come to mind, but you do have to watch rigorously what's happening on both.

[seykid31]

I like to think of it as different games within the game

[eluka]

The author himself says he will switch from same-opposite to opposite-same after a losing sequence.
A problem might be if you see several triggers at once? Would you switch systems and to which one?
I've heard it said (& written) that the holy grail is to play many systems at once (diversify?)
Funny you've brought this up, I've been thinking lately something similar and have half come to the conclusion that it would be good to have several sequences as triggers.
e.g.:
Matrix vertical, an extended sequence of doubles, certain pre-defined patterns (my old fave)
Events rarely go past 7 also. Simon's old dozen system (bet d1 & d2 then switch to d3 on a loss etc) is another one to keep an eye on.
Play 20-100 spins? and take a small amount of winnings. I like John's idea of only going for 5 units per session. Catch is they have to be decent size units to make it worthwhile.
Play sniper style and try not to use a marty where possible.
I'm trying to get around to doing a win/loss registry of your furthermost back dozens too to see if there's anything there. That method/idea has me intrigued.
E

[GLC]

As I think more about this idea, I keep coming back to this:  let's wait until we have a sizable imbalance and then instead of betting a martingale type sequence for the imbalance to stop, we start betting a flatbet for the opposite of the imbalance.  At most we only bet for a few spins.

Example:  We get 3 hits in the same line within 6 spins.  This is way out of balance so we bet 1 unit on the other 5 lines 1 time.  If we win we stop and wait for another imbalance.

Or we see 4 or 5 in a row of a dozen/column, so we wait until the repeating ends and then we bet on the other two dozens.  One time is enough, but we could bet 2 or 3 times.

Or we could see 8 or 9 of a color in a row.  Instead of betting that the streak will end, we wait until it ends and then we begin betting on the opposite color.  If we win the first bet, we can take the win and look for another trigger or we can continue to bet for black for a few spins.

I'm not thinking of extended play periods, more of a quick strike and retreat.

While we are playing this way, we can also be tracking our matrices waiting for our trebles and quads to form a trigger.

Just thinking out loud.  I think I'll do some testing and see how this works.

George

[F_LAT_INO]

George mate,
Since am now playing only airball on regular daily basis,and
the advantage of it cause I have a display of 20 last numbers
spun,so am constantly having control of happenings and when
see a chance/even thought am playing presently certain method/
of some other bet/as am tracking several visually/I'm also starting topping on it.
But for this kind of bet one must know several methods by head/no spreadsheets/
and bet 2-3 diff.methods at the same time untill individual win.
I find this kind of betting very challenging.

[GLC]

George mate,
Since am now playing only airball on regular daily basis,and
the advantage of it cause I have a display of 20 last numbers
spun,so am constantly having control of happenings and when
see a chance/even thought am playing presently certain method/
of some other bet/as am tracking several visually/I'm also starting topping on it.
But for this kind of bet one must know several methods by head/no spreadsheets/
and bet 2-3 diff.methods at the same time until individual win.
I find this kind of betting very challenging.

Thanks for this post Flatino.  It is exactly what I'm trying to detail here.
It is your way of playing that I'm trying to detail for those of us who don't have the experience that you have.
I'm trying to determine what a good trigger is to start playing a method.  Yes, even 2 or 3 methods at a time if the triggers are there.

I'm now looking at taking the last 37/38 spins as a cycle.  I analyse this cycle of spins to see if there are some obvious imbalances that I can bet will correct themselves.

I know that this is based on betting for what hasn't happened, that should have happened, to correct itself.  In a way I'm betting that if a trend developed in the 37/38 spin cycle, the opposite trend is likely in the next 37/38 spin cycle.

I am using a very gradual progression because I feel that eventually results will come back to statistical norms.

Can I stay in the game long enough for that to happen?  That's the $64,000 question.

Here's a simple example.  Let's say we got 23 Reds and only 12 Blacks in our 37 spins.  I would bet 1 unit on Black for the next 37 spins or until I am ahead by 3 units.  (Using MrJ's 3 unit win idea)

If, at the end of 37 more spins, the imbalance still hasn't corrected itself, I go to betting 2 units on Black expecting it to finally correct the imbalance.  If I reach +3 units, I stop.

I play for more than 1 imbalance to correct itself at a time.

I am mostly focusing on even chances right now since there are 3 sets to work with, but I also keep an eye on dozens/columns, lines and streets.

I have tested this on some histroical spins and it does welll most of the time.  Sometimes you can get into a real battle trying to stay in the game long enough.  But, that's the way with all these systems, right?

Keep doing well my friend.

George

[F_LAT_INO]

---Most of the time---

And what about other part George mate.

Several years back was playing BE vers.RO
On the same table from the first to very last spin
every night for almost a month.Was so much in the hole
that had to start topping straight out numbers/cause of
table limits/and the night I decided to stop chasing,it started
catching up,and at the end got MY money back,but wouldn't
suggest to anybody this kind of experience.

[seykid31]

GLC
I know you have try mostly evrything under the sun,have you try tracking in HO,HE,LO,LE in block of sixes,look for pattern or even trigger.Because on Airball american HO (27,25,29,19,31,21,33,23,35) numbers clusters in group of 2,and so the others.
Seykid.