*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sentinel3]

Aha your the famous JL.
Now let me ask you... how did your other systems go ? I've heard you was going on a huge casinotrip to make a killing. Did you?


Now back to that Magic first game. Why you think its special ? You let the Wheel decide when to start. But you use this strategy daily. Dont you think that variance will come on those first games ? Ill give you the answer .... many small games make one BIG game....therefor that variance you try to avoid  will come get you. I PROMISE 

Denzie how will that now happen..Dont you see. Tin soldiers is reporting a killer winning streak for PB. Playing it whenever you want.

If I was wrong to think the first game is special..That doesnt take anything away from the fact my new revised PB. Is now possibly the greatest roulette system unit for unit of alltime.

What can variance do to a strikerate of 22--1 Denzie. Whether it is for that one game a day. Or continuously all day.

22--1 when break even is 7--1. Means one thing. Anyone playing the revised PB CANNOT LOSE.

It is the HOLY GRAIL everyone searched for. I always knew it was a strong system. Just a shame as I always knew. Not enough people would take to it.

What I said 7 years ago I still say. The system doesnt fail. The human mind fails first. You start off with a cluster of losses and then announce the system a failure..Like Andre Class appears have.

So Tin Soldiers applied himself to this. I should and do thank him for doing so
Because it would seem. He has proven..that the revised PB is as good as it gets. Nobody not even myself. Would have believed true odds of 7--1 could be elevated to an incredible 22-1 with my tweak. I was hoping for maybe 15--1.

Yes I went to Europe and had a great time. And made some decent money. The other systems didnt hold up so well..Code 4 fell apart..started finding too many losses. Divide and conquer aswell.

The Matrix systems are more reliable. But a pain to play in a walk in casino. PATTERN BREAKER remains my finest moment..And my revised version is the ultimate even chance system I believe.

I am getting 22--1 on that first game its true. And currently getting 15--1 overall.

But it doesnt matter whether its 15--1 or 22--1..The only thing that now.matters is this. There are no excuses. PATTERN BREAKER REVISED IS HERE.ON THIS FORUM..It defeats the game of roulette easily. If you definately want to win at roulette. PLAY IT.

[Tinsoldiers]

So Tin Soldiers applied himself to this. I should and do thank him for doing so

Please don’t believe in anything you read. Test for yourselves to see what works well. As I said 19 sets is a small sample. I might have got lucky. 

[sentinel3]

Please don’t believe in anything you read. Test for yourselves to see what works well. As I said 19 sets is a small sample. I might have got lucky.

Well i still think you have lol..But if you even settle into the middle teens eventually 15--1 to 16--1..Thats still an improvement over the original system.

Heres where I stand after 355 games of the new revised PB.

GAMES PLAYED=355

GAMES WON=333

GAMES LOST=22

STRIKERATE=15--1

BREAK EVEN=7--1

LONGEST WIN STREAK 38 GAMES

CURRENT WIN STREAK 14 GAMES



(FIRST GAME OF THE DAY)

GAMES PLAYED=141

GAMES WON=135

GAMES LOST=6

LONGEST FIRST GAME OF THE DAY STREAK 36 DAYS

CURRENT STREAK 21 DAYS

STRIKERATE=22--1

BREAK EVEN=7--1

[RouletteGhost]

Sentinel

You are doing great. Good job

In a negative expectation game with a house edge we cannot beat, it’s a good thing to be ahead after the losses

No doubt how you are playing is solid

Who cares if system and strategies are silly.

Only one that it should matter to is you.

[Andre Chass]

Are you playing the original method?

For the pattern or against the pattern?

[celescliff]

Heres where I stand after 355 games of the new revised PB

In all those days and wins, how many spins you've been playing?

[sentinel3]

Are you playing the original method?

For the pattern or against the pattern?

Always against the last pattern Andre...

[sentinel3]

In all those days and wins, how many spins you've been playing?

Why is that important?

A game of PB can be over in one spin..So over the 141 days we will go with the average of 2 spins a game. Making 282 spins.

For the 355 games the same. So 710 spins average.

[celescliff]

Why is that important?

A game of PB can be over in one spin..So over the 141 days we will go with the average of 2 spins a game. Making 282 spins.

For the 355 games the same. So 710 spins average.

Every played spin belongs in one long term session and if you only played a few thousand spins you should not be suprised if the result will eventually go south.

I've had sessions with a method that played every spin that has going up over hundred thousand spins and then starting to go down.

There is not enough spins you played to claim that you have a HG.

You are not changing any odds betting against a pattern either. The odds are exactly the same no matter how long you wait. Thats not an opinion.

I'm happy for you that you won all these sessions over the years and hope you continue to do so.

[sentinel3]

Every played spin belongs in one long term session and if you only played a few thousand spins you should not be suprised if the result will eventually go south.

I've had sessions with a method that played every spin that has going up over hundred thousand spins and then starting to go down.

There is not enough spins you played to claim that you have a HG.

You are not changing any odds betting against a pattern either. The odds are exactly the same no matter how long you wait. Thats not an opinion.

I'm happy for you that you won all these sessions over the years and hope you continue to do so.

Okay thankyou,

To be clear though, I have never been concerned about the math. Otherwise I would.never have touched the game and have been alot worse off financially. What is supposed to happen with this game. And what does happen are two different things.

I have now been playing this system for 11 years. And not one of them has produced a negative downturn.

In its original format. It fluctuated between 10--1 and 14--1. It never once went below its true odds of 7--1.

In its new improved format. It is fluctuating between 13--1 and 16--1.

The plus 10 winning streaks have become more regular. If you have been playing a system for over 11 years. And not once has it produced a negative downturn in those 11 years. And nearly 14,000 games.

Then you can only feel positive about it. And thats why I feel it is that good. Its never let me down. And has been my bread and butter system for a long time.

[cht]

Yes, mathematically roulette is unbeatable, but maths doesn't play roulette, people do....
...why people play the [systems] game, some of which might be:

It's just fun.
The challenge of attempting the "impossible".
To learn about randomness, probability, statistics, and risk.
To learn self-discipline and how to master their impulses and emotions.
Because creating roulette systems is an exercise in creativity. ----------Bayes

link:://forum.x/index.php?topic=977.msg13489#msg13489

[Madi]

[quote author=sentinel3 link=topic=4655.msg190055#msg190055

I have now been playing this system for 11 years. And not one of them has produced a negative downturn.

In its original format. It fluctuated between 10--1 and 14--1. It never once went below its true odds of 7--1.


[/quote]

Which one u playing for 11 yrs? PB has been published on 2011. If u r johnlegend then its another story.

[sentinel3]

[quote author=sentinel3 link=topic=4655.msg190055#msg190055

I have now been playing this system for 11 years. And not one of them has produced a negative downturn.

In its original format. It fluctuated between 10--1 and 14--1. It never once went below its true odds of 7--1.




Which one u playing for 11 yrs? PB has been published on 2011. If u r johnlegend then its another story.

Hi Madi

I am the one formerly known as JL. And yes I have been playing this for 11 years. It was published on here in 2011. But I created it 4 years earlier.

[cht]

Thanks to JL contributions,  this simple game can be a lot faster with higher winrate(>=15-1) when played sequentially. Top rated.   

[Andre Chass]

I was testing it on RX and I figured out something similar to its system but it plays faster with great results.

Wait one of these two patterns to form and bet against immediately.

R     
B
B

Bet
B
R
R
...................

B
R
R

Bet
R
B
B

Progression 1-2-4 stoploss

Try it and take your own conclusions.

PS Never bet against RRR or BBB or BRB or RBR