*PATTERN BREAKER*

[TwoCatSam]

Thanks, Bro!

I'm with you 100%.

Sam

[Amazin]

Johnlegend, you keep making those claims about your winnings and all that. Unfortunately no one else seems to replicate the success you had. Have you thought about ways to prove that you're not lying?

[Johnlegend]

Johnlegend, you keep making those claims about your winnings and all that. Unfortunately no one else seems to replicate the success you had. Have you thought about ways to prove that you're not lying?

That's why I am doing the BV challenge Amazing. Keep watching. Others are having success. I am just the most vocal. A member called Chauncy47. Has been more successful than myself. Others are reaping rewards using their ways of beating the game. The question is are you ready to learn and win??. Because most aren't. That is why I have taken up the challenge. The passage of time will show how I win and build a modest BR into something few on here really believe possible.

You just keep checking into the BV challenge every couple of weeks. A year from now.you will realize I am for real.

[Paul2012]

Hello JL...

I have been following this forum for a while now as a guest, but decided to join now. I have read most of your systems, but would like to know which ones u currently use. I am ready to play by your rules on the systems u say work. I use ladbrokes online casino, only play live roulette and slingshot. 

[Chauncy47]

That's why I am doing the BV challenge Amazing. Keep watching. Others are having success. I am just the most vocal. A member called Chauncy47. Has been more successful than myself. Others are reaping rewards using their ways of beating the game. The question is are you ready to learn and win??. Because most aren't. That is why I have taken up the challenge. The passage of time will show how I win and build a modest BR into something few on here really believe possible.

You just keep checking into the BV challenge every couple of weeks. A year from now.you will realize I am for real.

JL is right, he is one of the most vocal members about his winnings and continuous success.   I usually post something in support of his approach to the game and so here I am again.  I enjoy amazing success using his methods and some of the other methods posted in this forum by other members, along with some great betting startegies that's been posted as well, specifically by GLC.  I can only share my experience and that is this:  I walk into a live casino between 10 and 15 times a week and I play CODE 4, D&C and P4 and a few others.  I never play on-line because I can't and if I could, I am not sure I would.  My progression is no greater than 3 and it's for 5 games.   Randomness has limits, most of the time, and JL's understanding of those limits are quite remarkable and it's my opinion (just my opinion) that his understanding of those limits contribute to his success.  Most times, I walk out of the casino with gain but there are times when I don't.  I am very grateful for the times I don't because it has provided me with an opportunity to observe randomness at it's best and then I use that data for future play.  Once I realized and got this concept burned into my brain: It's not about what I walked out of the casino with today, but it's about what I have gained at end of the month or year.  This games requires so much discipline and if you can master that area combined with the method of your choice, winning is the only possible outcome.  I don't believe that you can chart randomness to confirm whether a method is going to be successful for not.  It's about your thinking, your thoughts and what can be believed in the world of randomness and for me, I believe that randomness has limits most of the time and I exploit those limits using JL's methods.  It's important to remember that his methods also include "thinking," not just the method by itself.  In a recent PM to JL, I told him that by late summer 2013, I will have done well enough that I would take a trip across the pond to buy him several beers and personally thank him for posting his ideas and I look forward to doing that.  Sorry for being so long winded and I will finish on this note and go back to being an observer: If I could offer some guidance to anyone, I would share this: Don't get hung up what is called the winning method but understand randomness has limits and apply ironclad discipline, control over emotions and "out of the box thinking" when approaching this game and the only possible outcome will be winning - most of the time.   

[GLC]

Chauncy47!!

Don't wait so long between posts.

[Turner]

Chauncy.....Is JL bringing out a book or something? Sounds like one of those write ups on the back cover...lol

(jokin!!!....take your mouse off the "report to moderator" button)

[Johnlegend]

Chauncy.....Is JL bringing out a book or something? Sounds like one of those write ups on the back cover...LoL

(jokin!!!....take your mouse off the "report to moderator" button)

Chauncy47 is a great example for the forum Turner. We need more people like him.

[Bettor 27]

...I can only share my experience and that is this:  I walk into a live casino between 10 and 15 times a week and I play CODE 4, D&C and P4 and a few others. I never play on-line because I can't and if I could, I am not sure I would.  My progression is no greater than 3 and it's for 5 games.....I will finish on this note and go back to being an observer: If I could offer some guidance to anyone, I would share this: Don't get hung up what is called the winning method but understand randomness has limits and apply ironclad discipline, control over emotions and "out of the box thinking" when approaching this game and the only possible outcome will be winning - most of the time.

Hi Chauncy47,

So each time you go to the casino you play only 5 games and walk out right?

So your visit goes something like this:

1 game of CODE 4
1 game of D&C
1 game of P4
1 game of another method
1 game of another method?

[Amazin]

@chuancy 47: how long have you been playing roulette? Do you realise that it doesnt matter if you are playing hit and run and the adds will always remains the same?  It just means It wIll take longer to lose but It surely wIll happen. I'm worried that one day reality will set in and your winnings will go back to the casino again.

[TwoCatSam]

Why do we think random has limits? 

[XXVV]

To Chauncy47 and JL.

Once again thanks for your very positive writings and in particular by the latest note from Chauncy.  Through this it is clear that he has found, and continues to work toward a fine understanding of the nature of roulette in particular, and randomness in general. I like the tone of his writing which indicates a genuine humility in the face of the tough demands of random. There are some wonderful principles stated in this
passage.

It is fascinating how roulette can be seen as 'microcosm' of many areas, and in a sense, of life itself. Lessons learned from long developed practice at the wheel can be applied to many areas, and reading and seizing of opportunities, within reason, can be extremely rewarding. Handling loss can also be a sub-set of handling rejection- one of the most difficult of psychological tasks. Just ask Dr Philip McGraw.

The matrix of roulette can be unravelled from many angles and as with many random examples, can sometimes appear more complex/ darker than other times which may appear better lit/ lighter/ illuminated and thus accessible.

It takes great patience and compounded knowledge and then applied wisdom to chip away at the opportunities roulette outcomes can provide.

A humourous example a few days ago for me was learning from a wiser attack strategy on roulette play, I applied a simple three parlay place bet on races in Sydney featuring a combination of analysis of particular horses, and the skills of a young genius jockey recently arrived in Australia. The resulting 15 to 1 payout was a dramatic illustration of the power of sensible parlay cover bets.

Parlay and place bets seen as a six line parlay.

Roulette helping Racing.  LoL.

[Johnlegend]

To Chauncy47 and JL.

Once again thanks for your very positive writings and in particular by the latest note from Chauncy.  Through this it is clear that he has found, and continues to work toward a fine understanding of the nature of roulette in particular, and randomness in general. I like the tone of his writing which indicates a genuine humility in the face of the tough demands of random. There are some wonderful principles stated in this
passage.

It is fascinating how roulette can be seen as 'microcosm' of many areas, and in a sense, of life itself. Lessons learned from long developed practice at the wheel can be applied to many areas, and reading and seizing of opportunities, within reason, can be extremely rewarding. Handling loss can also be a sub-set of handling rejection- one of the most difficult of psychological tasks. Just ask Dr Philip McGraw.

The matrix of roulette can be unravelled from many angles and as with many random examples, can sometimes appear more complex/ darker than other times which may appear better lit/ lighter/ illuminated and thus accessible.

It takes great patience and compounded knowledge and then applied wisdom to chip away at the opportunities roulette outcomes can provide.

A humourous example a few days ago for me was learning from a wiser attack strategy on roulette play, I applied a simple three parlay place bet on races in Sydney featuring a combination of analysis of particular horses, and the skills of a young genius jockey recently arrived in Australia. The resulting 15 to 1 payout was a dramatic illustration of the power of sensible parlay cover bets.

Parlay and place bets seen as a six line parlay.

Roulette helping Racing.  LoL.

Good to see you back on the forum XXVV. Yes Chauncy is an inspiration even to me. If even 1 in every 20 people who play this game had his mindset. Wow we would see some change in the general concensus on this games status as unconquerable longterm. I am making my own endeavour to banish that flawed thinking. And others who have the right thought process are doing the same. Its a battle because old thinking dies alot harder than old habits.

Through the passage of time. And through sure and certain success. I will in my part change a few minds.

[TwoCatSam]

 ***********I will in my part change a few minds.**********

Post some clear rules and you might do it!!

DELETE DELETE DELETE...........

Sam

[XXVV]

Yes it is quite fascinating. The comments made are quite fair. To be professionally successful at roulette I believe entails many many skills and the thinking/ application is by no means linear.

Over the past 9 months I have tried to balance roulette play with some testing and somewhat extreme random life conditions. The inability for statistics and probability theory to deal in the short term with Earthquake behaviour ( physical and social) has demonstrated to me that reality needs best served by a variety of solutions and approaches that are in effect both quantum and classical.

What I am driving at is that in the short term there can be wild aberrations from the norm and we must find ways to cope or to take advantage of these. In the medium to long term our desire for normality and rationalisation will provide a linus blanket type average/ rationale which can guide us.

In the immdeiate context of where I now work on this basis we still have the unsettling 75% likelihood of an M5.5 EQ over the next 6 months. After that it diminishes to M5.0 and so on, on a slow decay curve.

Menacingly, and linking here roulette theory to earthquake probability theory, there is also a 70% chance of an M8.0 (!!!) earthquake in the Alps here within the next 20 years. It is overdue they say thanks to a 300 year average and we have the geo-tech evidence to prove it.

Last month I saw 10 zero's materialise within 90 spins and overall within 250 spins were 19 hits. Extreme event!  Yet also number 10 slept for 350 spins recently. No big deal? That is real live casino play. I was recently told by a scientific colleague that in his access to random.org with double zero wheel he had experienced greater than 1000 spins without a show by 00.

This latter is a real worry and demonstrates to me random sampling based on atmospheric noise can be hampered by satellites or airline routes!

The grunge mechanical random generation of the live casino wheels is our reality, and we need to work with that. It is not as 'pure' a random as some other generators would have us believe.

So I say get real! Adapt to reality of what we deal with!

Apply some basic sound techniques (linear).

Overview to include some vast experience as the bet behaviours/ characteristics you have witnessed ( increasingly fuzzy).

Apply mental practices which sharpen our ability to be in 'the zone' (metaphysical).

Work with 'free money' so as to be detached and not 'needy'.

Play smart, street wise, and take short sharp profits.

Read the game matrix and attack very aggressively when the opportunities arise ( say 1 in 5 games).

Play defensively when encountering a counter attack from random. Take a small loss if necessary and get out and find shelter.

Most of the time there will be short  sequences of opportunities. Seize them and simply accrue. compound or parlay until a suitable goal is achieved.

I do believe it is possible to average compound 10% per day on your bank, and that allows for, in my experience, two losses for every 10 sessions.

The instructions to achieve this set of astonishing outcomes cannot be written as a series of linear, black and white rules, although some of the play initiates and uses them ( those that are appropriate to be used from a selected arsenal of methods).

Where I am coming from here is to argue that our way of looking at random has to change, and that we have to be very flexible in our thinking, and be open, sometimes to the unthinkable. I can vouch that I have experienced live play in states of brain activity that are more toward the alpha states, and there are several ways to develop this. More on this later.

Moral of the story - apply lots of approaches to deal with random, from linear to fuzzy to further out. If it works it works. Its a pragmatic science.