*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sentinel3]

Have you just been playing the original pattern breaker?

This is how I record my games. This is the first game I played today.

22/01/2018

GAME 0615

RRRâ– 3
RRBâ– 5
RBBâ– 6
RBR🛑8---(BBB)-(STEP 1)
BBBâ– 4
BBRâ– 1
BRR🛑7--(45 SPINS)-(6TH ATTEMPT)
BRBâ– 2

This is how I record my results for my records. So I can see not only a win or loss. But how things broke down from start to finish.

[atlantis]

Thank you Sentinel3 for your explanation.

I've been trying testing continuous games without waiting for patterns to form..
Recording results on each line horizontally.

Bet OPPOSITE of first 3 recorded results on each line.

Format: H/L - O/E - H/L      H/L - O/E - H/L

Progression 1-2-3 = 6u risk.

Profit on first 2 steps = +1; Profit on 3rd step = +0

My target = +4 per game

EXAMPLE GAMES PLAYED JUST NOW:
===============================

HOH    HEL w2nd
HOH    LOH w1st
HOH    LEH  w1st
LEL     LEH  w3rd
LOL     HEH w1st

w+4


LEL     HEH  w1st
LEL     LEH   w3rd
HOL    LEH   w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st
LEL     HEL   w1st

w+4


HEL     LOL  w1st
HEL     HOH w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st
HEL    LOL   w1st

w+4

LEH    LEH   L-6
LEH    HOH  w1st
HEL    LEL   w1st
HEH    HEL  w3rd
HOL    LEL   w1st
LEL     LOL  w2nd
HOL    HOH w3rd
LEL     HOL  w1st
HEH    HOL  w2nd
LEL     HOH  w1st
HOL    LOH  w1st
LEH    LOL  w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st

w+4

HOH    LOL  w1st
HEH    HOH  w2nd
LOH    LEH   w2nd
HOL    HEH  w2nd

w+4

LEH     LEH  L-6
LEL     HOH  w1st
LEL     LOL   w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
HEH     HOL  w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
LOH    LEL  w2nd
LOH    HOH w1st
HOL    LEH  w1st
HOH    LOL  w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st

w+4

HEH    LEL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HEL     HOL w2nd
HEL     HOL w2nd

w+4

HOH     LOL w1st
LEL      HEL w1st
LOL      LOH w3rd
LEL      LOH  w2nd
HEH     LOH   w1st

w+4

LOH    LEH w2nd
LOH    LOH L-6
LOH    LEL  w2nd
HEH    HEL w3rd
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LOL  w1st
LOH    HOL  w1st
LEH    LOL  w1st
HEH   HOL  w2nd
LOL    LOH w3rd
LEL    LOH w2nd
LEH    HOH w1st
HOL    LOH w1st

w+4

LOH    LEL w2nd
HEH    LOL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LEL w1st

w+4

At first try it doesn't seem too shabby...?

A.

[DoctorSudoku]

Thank you Sentinel3 for your explanation.

I've been trying testing continuous games without waiting for patterns to form..
Recording results on each line horizontally.

Bet OPPOSITE of first 3 recorded results on each line.

Format: H/L - O/E - H/L      H/L - O/E - H/L

Progression 1-2-3 = 6u risk.

Profit on first 2 steps = +1; Profit on 3rd step = +0

My target = +4 per game

EXAMPLE GAMES PLAYED JUST NOW:
===============================

HOH    HEL w2nd
HOH    LOH w1st
HOH    LEH  w1st
LEL     LEH  w3rd
LOL     HEH w1st

w+4


LEL     HEH  w1st
LEL     LEH   w3rd
HOL    LEH   w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st
LEL     HEL   w1st

w+4


HEL     LOL  w1st
HEL     HOH w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st
HEL    LOL   w1st

w+4

LEH    LEH   L-6
LEH    HOH  w1st
HEL    LEL   w1st
HEH    HEL  w3rd
HOL    LEL   w1st
LEL     LOL  w2nd
HOL    HOH w3rd
LEL     HOL  w1st
HEH    HOL  w2nd
LEL     HOH  w1st
HOL    LOH  w1st
LEH    LOL  w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st

w+4

HOH    LOL  w1st
HEH    HOH  w2nd
LOH    LEH   w2nd
HOL    HEH  w2nd

w+4

LEH     LEH  L-6
LEL     HOH  w1st
LEL     LOL   w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
HEH     HOL  w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
LOH    LEL  w2nd
LOH    HOH w1st
HOL    LEH  w1st
HOH    LOL  w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st

w+4

HEH    LEL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HEL     HOL w2nd
HEL     HOL w2nd

w+4

HOH     LOL w1st
LEL      HEL w1st
LOL      LOH w3rd
LEL      LOH  w2nd
HEH     LOH   w1st

w+4

LOH    LEH w2nd
LOH    LOH L-6
LOH    LEL  w2nd
HEH    HEL w3rd
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LOL  w1st
LOH    HOL  w1st
LEH    LOL  w1st
HEH   HOL  w2nd
LOL    LOH w3rd
LEL    LOH w2nd
LEH    HOH w1st
HOL    LOH w1st

w+4

LOH    LEL w2nd
HEH    LOL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LEL w1st

w+4

At first try it doesn't seem too shabby...?

A.

But if your bet selection strategy is what has been highlighted above, then it is NOT Pattern Breaker.

In Pattern Breaker, you wait for 7 of the 8 patterns to form.

Just to be clear, when playing B/R, the patterns are BBB, RRR, BRR, BBR, BRB, RBR, RRB, and RBB.

And as soon as the 7th pattern has formed, you immediately bet against the 8th (the last remaining pattern) from forming over the next three spins.

But the method that you have outlined above is a far cry from that.

[DoctorSudoku]

Another point:
I have noticed that most of the wins come on the first two spins, so nowadays I just employ a 1 2 progression. If I lose the first two spins, I just accept a three unit loss for that game and wait for the next trigger situation (game) to appear.

Also, I keep switching between B/R to O/E to H/L and back to R/B and so on and so forth. And I do NOT play this method for more than two consecutive games (as I have explained before several times in this thread).

So far I have had good results using the above changes to the original method.

[atlantis]

But if your bet selection strategy is what has been highlighted above, then it is NOT Pattern Breaker.

In Pattern Breaker, you wait for 7 of the 8 patterns to form.

Just to be clear, when playing B/R, the patterns are BBB, RRR, BRR, BBR, BRB, RBR, RRB, and RBB.

And as soon as the 7th pattern has formed, you immediately bet against the 8th (the last remaining pattern) from forming over the next three spins.

My apologies, Sentinel3.
I know that - was just trying this. Maybe I should not have confused ppl by being so quick to post my idea and findings into this topic..
Of course it is NOT PB. (but still betting against a mixed pattern; and still 3 bets)
Regards,
A.

[sentinel3]

Thank you Sentinel3 for your explanation.

I've been trying testing continuous games without waiting for patterns to form..
Recording results on each line horizontally.

Bet OPPOSITE of first 3 recorded results on each line.

Format: H/L - O/E - H/L      H/L - O/E - H/L

Progression 1-2-3 = 6u risk.

Profit on first 2 steps = +1; Profit on 3rd step = +0

My target = +4 per game

EXAMPLE GAMES PLAYED JUST NOW:
===============================

HOH    HEL w2nd
HOH    LOH w1st
HOH    LEH  w1st
LEL     LEH  w3rd
LOL     HEH w1st

w+4


LEL     HEH  w1st
LEL     LEH   w3rd
HOL    LEH   w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st
LEL     HEL   w1st

w+4


HEL     LOL  w1st
HEL     HOH w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st
HEL    LOL   w1st

w+4

LEH    LEH   L-6
LEH    HOH  w1st
HEL    LEL   w1st
HEH    HEL  w3rd
HOL    LEL   w1st
LEL     LOL  w2nd
HOL    HOH w3rd
LEL     HOL  w1st
HEH    HOL  w2nd
LEL     HOH  w1st
HOL    LOH  w1st
LEH    LOL  w2nd
LOH    HEH  w1st

w+4

HOH    LOL  w1st
HEH    HOH  w2nd
LOH    LEH   w2nd
HOL    HEH  w2nd

w+4

LEH     LEH  L-6
LEL     HOH  w1st
LEL     LOL   w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
HEH     HOL  w2nd
LEH     LOL  w2nd
LOH    LEL  w2nd
LOH    HOH w1st
HOL    LEH  w1st
HOH    LOL  w1st
HEL     LOH  w1st

w+4

HEH    LEL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HEL     HOL w2nd
HEL     HOL w2nd

w+4

HOH     LOL w1st
LEL      HEL w1st
LOL      LOH w3rd
LEL      LOH  w2nd
HEH     LOH   w1st

w+4

LOH    LEH w2nd
LOH    LOH L-6
LOH    LEL  w2nd
HEH    HEL w3rd
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LOL  w1st
LOH    HOL  w1st
LEH    LOL  w1st
HEH   HOL  w2nd
LOL    LOH w3rd
LEL    LOH w2nd
LEH    HOH w1st
HOL    LOH w1st

w+4

LOH    LEL w2nd
HEH    LOL w1st
LEL     HOL w1st
HOL    LEL w1st

w+4

At first try it doesn't seem too shabby...?

A.

This is interesting Atlantis thankyou.

Heres what ive observed over 620 games now.

RRRâ– 1
RRBâ– 2
RBBâ– 3

Ive never seen those three patterns form in order top to bottom. Interesting. Even when the first pattern is

RRRâ– 1

Those other two dont follow in sequence. This is from 620 games now. Even if i had lost that 3 times in those games.

I dont know its interesting to me.

I be thinking if we start once you have

RRRâ– 1
RR
How long does 1 2 4 8 survive. I need to test that.

[sentinel3]

My apologies, Sentinel3.
I know that - was just trying this. Maybe I should not have confused ppl by being so quick to post my idea and findings into this topic..
Of course it is NOT PB. (but still betting against a mixed pattern; and still 3 bets)
Regards,
A.

No need to apologize Atlantis. Dr Sudoku asked the question. I like to see fresh angles on things.

BTW your HEHOHE Idea is still going good. Tested over 500 lines now.

[atlantis]

No need to apologize Atlantis. Dr Sudoku asked the question. I like to see fresh angles on things.

BTW your HEHOHE Idea is still going good. Tested over 500 lines now.

Good to hear abt that method - but I actually think I prefer the new way I just posted over that particular one now...

(Regarding Scooby's 'reverse zone' method we discussed, I am in agreement with what you had to say totally on that one and I have discarded it fairly quickly after some failed tests - Thanks for your quick feedback and advice on that)

Your recent comments about the strengths, low risks and low exposure with PB are good valid points to keep in mind.

A.

[sentinel3]

Good to hear abt that method - but I actually think I prefer the new way I just posted over that particular one now...

(Regarding Scooby's 'reverse zone' method we discussed, I am in agreement with what you had to say totally on that one and I have discarded it fairly quickly after some failed tests - Thanks for your quick feedback and advice on that)

Your recent comments about the strengths, low risks and low exposure with PB are good valid points to keep in mind.

A.

I have to take a good look at your new twist then Atlantis if you really feel its stronger and safer than even 6.

Im staying on even chance systems. I find them more reliable and stable. The dozens can be very volatile. And betting on two dozens is not really appealing to me.

Ive always liked the simplicity on the even chances. Pattern breaker and some of your ideas are the best thing on this forum as far as im concerned. They deliver.

So I will be looking at your new concept closely. And let you know how it goes.

[Apolloo]

Hi guys. Just been thinking is there anything that the losing sessions seem to have in common.

Maybe over 50 spins and still no bet we dont play that set, as im thinking it got more chance of hitting that 8th pattern the longer the session goes on.

[sentinel3]

Hi guys. Just been thinking is there anything that the losing sessions seem to have in common.

Maybe over 50 spins and still no bet we dont play that set, as im thinking it got more chance of hitting that 8th pattern the longer the session goes on.

Hi Apollo

Ive got 622 games recorded now. My longest game to date that lost was 105 spins my shortest 27 spins. Theres no real bias or advantage in game length and losses. In fact most of my losing games 50 now out of 622 have been sub 50 spins in length.

A losing game in my estimation is just a matter of entering the cycle on the wrong spin. So by the time you get to the 7th pattern. And the 8th pattern forms immediately to cause a loss. In another game the 7th and 8th patterns would have been say the 3rd and 4th patterns.

See ive come to the conclusion now. That the ultimate way to play pattern breaker is as follows. If you want very few losses.

Records all even chances simultaneously. Which I do anyway. And wait for a loss and bet on the next even chance out of the two remaining. And you will rarely lose. You will need more patience of course. But your win rate will be phenomenal.

In 900 sets of three even chances I have on record there are 88 losing games. But heres the awesome part. There are only 4 with two losses out of the three.

And there are none where all three even chances in a set lost. Which basically means a 9 step progression would probably never lose. Or so rarely it would have no impact on your success and profit making.

So I think theres alot to think about here. But back to the game length. No you just play a game and hope you entered the cycle at the right time.

[Apolloo]

Hi sentinel3 thanks. So looks like 9 wins to 1 loss. The 1,2,3 prog work well like said in previous post.

Yeah the waiting for one loss could take alot patience.
Unless played with a different patient system at same time.

Anyone tried 1,3,4 progression if wins mostly come in first 2 steps.

[Apolloo]

And say your recording all 3 even chances at same time. Can you not get into situations where your betting at exactly the same time on say H,L and R,B so how could a 9 step progression work?

[RouletteGhost]

are you playing the original rules of the strategy?

[Apolloo]

Yes i think so.



Efbet Hemus Europe/Sofia time (08:00 - 10:00)   30th dec

8 13 13
34 20 14
8 20 21
26 14 33
31 29 8
26 29 10
22 9 15
20 19 26
12 17 9
16 26 11  *LLH BET HHL
8 21 14 W+1

26 16 5
27 4 36
0 35 6
36 26 13
11 25 9
3 28 19
26 36 20
28 22 24
24 22 35
15 36 23
9 34 9
14 13 22
20 15 27
14 3 14
34 32 4
13 14 29 *LLL BET HHH
10 31 10 W+1

(+2)
_______________