*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sentinel3]

Hi sentinel3.

Pattern breaker!!

Its the only thing im playing for real atm. Just tests on all others.

Okay.

Just had a rare occurance.

Tracking spins for all even chances. HIGH LOW formed the first 7 patterns in 21 spins the minumum possible no repeaters.

So I risked double what I would normally bet on LLH the 8th pattern and it played out HLL. So a win on the first step.

In over a thousand games I now have recorded thats only the second time ive seen that. Ive never seen all 8 patterns form one after the other in 24 spins.

[Apolloo]

Okay.

Just had a rare occurance.

Tracking spins for all even chances. HIGH LOW formed the first 7 patterns in 21 spins the minumum possible no repeaters.

So I risked double what I would normally bet on LLH the 8th pattern and it played out HLL. So a win on the first step.

In over a thousand games I now have recorded thats only the second time ive seen that. Ive never seen all 8 patterns form one after the other in 24 spins.

Waw they be quick sessions them, hope i run into one. Ill probably double up first bets aswell.

Iv only seen no win so LLL on the R/B so far and both were betting BBB haha. Not that i have 100s of games played just thought id share.

[sentinel3]

Waw they be quick sessions them, hope i run into one. Ill probably double up first bets aswell.

Iv only seen no win so LLL on the R/B so far and both were betting BBB haha. Not that i have 100s of games played just thought id share.

Thats the thing about tracking all 3 chances Apolloo. You will be more likely to get games qualify inside 40 spins more often.

[Apolloo]

Iv decided to just play on H/L and RB as it can get abit much to deal with all 3 even chances when tracking and betting at a 40 sec spin wheel.

?? Anyone else play just 2 of the even chances at same time and had them both lose within the same game?

[sentinel3]

Waw they be quick sessions them, hope i run into one. Ill probably double up first bets aswell.

Iv only seen no win so LLL on the R/B so far and both were betting BBB haha. Not that i have 100s of games played just thought id share.

This is how the complete set played out.

25/01/2018

Game 0640

HHH🛑(7)--(21 SPINS)
HHLâ– 4
HLLâ– 1
HLHâ– 2
LLLâ– 6
LLH🛑(---(HLL)-(STEP 1)
LHHâ– 5
LHLâ– 3

Game 0641

EEEâ– 1
EEOâ– 4
EOOâ– 3
EOE🛑(---(EOO)-(STEP 3)
OOO🛑(7)--(24 SPINS)
OOEâ– 2
OEEâ– 6
OEOâ– 5

Game 0642

RRRâ– 2
RRBâ– 4
RBBâ– 3
RBR🛑(---(RRR)-(STEP 2)
BBBâ– 1
BBRâ– 5
BRRâ– 6
BRB🛑(7)--(33 SPINS)

[atlantis]

Hi,

Hi sentinel3,

Well I don't know if a 'genius' system or not.. Now believe it or not last night with 3 strikes EC as I described it, I got my first back to back losses:

LOH LOH
HOH HOH
and after 3 more lines another DOUBLE loss occurred!!
HOH HOH
LOL LOL

Because I was using the safer progression, I still managed to close the session after a few more lines win with a -2 ; not bad considering... (highest bet was 5u; which won on first step)

However it made me think..
Firstly, perhaps it IS better playing with a 1-2-3 (6 unit risk)
but in future play only after a REPEAT has occurred!

As others are doing - can play against other combo formations too:

1. R/B and  O/E
2. R/B and  H/L
3. H/L and O/E
4. H/L and R/B

To get qualifiying bets track the numbers on a rolling basis and always look at the

LAST SIX results eg:

25 2 34 33 4 19 this translates as:

1. RER BER
2. RLR BLR
3. HEH HEH
4. HBH HBH

Note there are 2 qualifiers already: Bet against HEH or HBH using 1-2-3. I will choose HEH...

next number is 35(H)= L1
next number is 15(O)= w1 on second step

Now the last 6 looks like this:

34 33 4 19 35 15 which translates to:

1.ROB ROB
2.RHB RHB
3.HOL HOL
4.HBL HBL

There are 4 qualifiers! I choose to go against HBL

next number is 4 (L) = w1 on first step

Now the last 6 looks like this:

33 4 19 35 15 4

1. BER BOB
2. BLR BLB
3. HEH HOL
4. HBH HBL

There are NO qualifiers. Wait for next number = 26

4 19 35 15 4 26

1. BEB BEB
2. BLB BLB
3. HEH HOL
4. HBH HBL

There are 2 qualifiers. I decide to go against BEB

next number is 16 (R) = w1 on first step

Anyway do you get the idea now?

However, I'm thinking STOP after a WIN (+1) or STOP on a 6u LOSS - just in case of back to back losers!!!!
End the session and come back later to try and recoup.

Remember - this just IDEAS. This is not the same as JL's PATTERN BREAKER and not enough testing has been done to play with a serious amount of money.

A.

[sentinel3]

Hi,

Hi sentinel3,

Well I don't know if a 'genius' system or not.. Now believe it or not last night with 3 strikes EC as I described it, I got my first back to back losses:

LOH LOH
HOH HOH
and after 3 more lines another DOUBLE loss occurred!!
HOH HOH
LOL LOL

Because I was using the safer progression, I still managed to close the session after a few more lines win with a -2 ; not bad considering... (highest bet was 5u; which won on first step)

However it made me think..
Firstly, perhaps it IS better playing with a 1-2-3 (6 unit risk)
but in future play only after a REPEAT has occurred!

As others are doing - can play against other combo formations too:

1. R/B and  O/E
2. R/B and  H/L
3. H/L and O/E
4. H/L and R/B

To get qualifiying bets track the numbers on a rolling basis and always look at the

LAST SIX results eg:

25 2 34 33 4 19 this translates as:

1. RER BER
2. RLR BLR
3. HEH HEH
4. HBH HBH

Note there are 2 qualifiers already: Bet against HEH or HBH using 1-2-3. I will choose HEH...

next number is 35(H)= L1
next number is 15(O)= w1 on second step

Now the last 6 looks like this:

34 33 4 19 35 15 which translates to:

1.ROB ROB
2.RHB RHB
3.HOL HOL
4.HBL HBL

There are 4 qualifiers! I choose to go against HBL

next number is 4 (L) = w1 on first step

Now the last 6 looks like this:

33 4 19 35 15 4

1. BER BOB
2. BLR BLB
3. HEH HOL
4. HBH HBL

There are NO qualifiers. Wait for next number = 26

4 19 35 15 4 26

1. BEB BEB
2. BLB BLB
3. HEH HOL
4. HBH HBL

There are 2 qualifiers. I decide to go against BEB

next number is 16 (R) = w1 on first step

Anyway do you get the idea now?

However, I'm thinking STOP after a WIN (+1) or STOP on a 6u LOSS - just in case of back to back losers!!!!
End the session and come back later to try and recoup.

Remember - this just IDEAS. This is not the same as JL's PATTERN BREAKER and not enough testing has been done to play with a serious amount of money.

A.

OMG Atlantis that be scary.

But may I ask where you got those results? I was tracking last night on slingshot. Which is an automated roulette wheel no dealer. And I saw three losses in 5 games on there.

But ive not seen too many losses on live dealer. Which is the only thing I believe in really.

Yeah maybe trying one snipe and run for a few hundred games will give us a better idea if this can hold up longterm.

Remember even with PB you only play one game at a time. But lately the whole set has thrown up some fantastic possibilities. Ive played three sets of 3 today. And they all won.

Even though I stopped after the first win. So im gonna stay with 4 by 4 for now. If I hit too many losses I will go one game and shut down style.

[Apolloo]

Just seen 14 odds run down one line. And number 29 hit 5 times in 10 spins... 4 in a row in one line.

E
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
29
29
29
29
O
O
E


Anyway...

Day 4 = +3u

[sentinel3]

Just seen 14 odds run down one line. And number 29 hit 5 times in 10 spins... 4 in a row in one line.

E
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
29
29
29
29
O
O
E


Anyway...

Day 4 = +3u

Yeah variance can produce amazing patterns. But PB. Sets a puzzle it has to work hard to figure out.

Im on a run. Just won my 26th straight game with PB. A new record over my previous best of 25.

[Apolloo]

👍 i now play all three ECs stop after if all win... But Whichever if any lose i play another round for that particular EC that lost with stakes 6,12,28 to recover. Im playing with the confidence i wont see a double loss. But do realise it can happen.. But rare!!

[sentinel3]

👍 i now play all three ECs stop after if all win... But Whichever if any lose i play another round for that particular EC that lost with stakes 6,12,28 to recover. Im playing with the confidence i wont see a double loss. But do realise it can happen.. But rare!!

Im learning more and more about this system every week.

When you play all three even chances. Your wait for a game is shorter. While playing all three. The first game has always qualified inside 40 spins. This is fascinating. And could have potential. For closing that 7th pattern.

If we now know that it can hardly ever leave the 30s. Do you see what im getting at here?

[Apolloo]

Im learning more and more about this system every week.

When you play all three even chances. Your wait for a game is shorter. While playing all three. The first game has always qualified inside 40 spins. This is fascinating. And could have potential. For closing that 7th pattern.

If we now know that it can hardly ever leave the 30s. Do you see what im getting at here?

Yeah think i get you... So if after 36 spins we have 6 patterns complete we could if wanted bet on the 7th pattern to come.

So if we see the H/L is completing the patterns first and faster than the other two ECs and need lets say HHL, HLL to come still after the 36th spin. We could now bet for it to come. Could atleast gain +1u there.

If it is the case that 99% at least one of the ECs do hit 7 patterns within 40spins.

[Apolloo]

Perfect example would of been on my session today.
After 36 spins we still have no bet... needing RBR and RRB to come from R/B. so on the 37the spin...

37th spin. = R.   
38th spin. = B. 

.... Now bet on R for the 7th pattern to.come the RBR.   

39th spin = R   (W+1)

And now we have another bet as normal on that 8th pattern RRB not to come in next.

[sentinel3]

Yeah think i get you... So if after 36 spins we have 6 patterns complete we could if wanted bet on the 7th pattern to come.

So if we see the H/L is completing the patterns first and faster than the other two ECs and need lets say HHL, HLL to come still after the 36th spin. We could now bet for it to come. Could atleast gain +1u there.

If it is the case that 99% at least one of the ECs do hit 7 patterns within 40spins.

Thats whats happening here. Well the winning streak came to an end. But 27 straight wins I cannot complain.

Heres what be on my mind. If we reach a point where we are in the 30s. And theres an oppurtunity to close the 7th pattern of the first game. We take it.

Using 1 2 4.

All first games that qualify in the 30s. Have the 7th pattern close. On spins 33,36 or 39.

Going over my records only 7 times out of more that 360 sets of three. Has the first game gone to the 42nd spin or longer to qualify.

This is powerful to me. You have to keep in mind not all first games reach the 30s. Many qualify in the 20s. Usually spin 27. Spin 33 is very popular for the first pattern 7 to close.

But my god what im thinking here is

1 2 4 8 16. To cover spins 27,30,33,36,39. Might win 100s of times to every loss. It doesnt matter which even chance it is. Or if you want to be more conservative. You play 33,36,39. With 1 2 4.

This is like a system of its own. And could be more powerful than pattern breaker itself. Im gonna keep monitoring. But its looking really solid.

[Apolloo]

Thats whats happening here. Well the winning streak came to an end. But 27 straight wins I cannot complain.

Heres what be on my mind. If we reach a point where we are in the 30s. And theres an oppurtunity to close the 7th pattern of the first game. We take it.

Using 1 2 4.

All first games that qualify in the 30s. Have the 7th pattern close. On spins 33,36 or 39.

Going over my records only 7 times out of more that 360 sets of three. Has the first game gone to the 42nd spin or longer to qualify.

This is powerful to me. You have to keep in mind not all first games reach the 30s. Many qualify in the 20s. Usually spin 27. Spin 33 is very popular for the first pattern 7 to close.

But my god what im thinking here is

1 2 4 8 16. To cover spins 27,30,33,36,39. Might win 100s of times to every loss. It doesnt matter which even chance it is. Or if you want to be more conservative. You play 33,36,39. With 1 2 4.

This is like a system of its own. And could be more powerful than pattern breaker itself. Im gonna keep monitoring. But its looking really solid.

33rd, 36th ,39th ,42nd

With 1,2,4,8 could work great yeah.

But wouldnt it be if...only one EC has completed 6 patterns and the other two EC only completed 3 or 4 of its patterns. 

Good tho 👍