• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*PATTERN BREAKER*

Started by Johnlegend, Apr 08, 05:46 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 155 Guests are viewing this topic.

Tinsoldiers

Quote from: Tinsoldiers on Feb 09, 09:10 PM 2018Why do you think so?
I read your post again. I agree with you and thats what I have been saying as well. There will be winners and losers at both end of the spectrum. But he seems to think differently. He seems to think everyone will win, if they stick their guns and play 200 games like he does. Which i dont sign up to.

cht

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Feb 09, 09:09 PM 2018

In soccer lingo, it is also called "parking the bus."

Are you sure you are not Jose Mourinho  coming here in disguise to satiate your gambling addiction, eh?

:twisted:   :twisted:
Don't ever count the chosen one out from FA/CL. He has done it with lesser teams.  :thumbsup:

DoctorSudoku

Quote from: cht on Feb 09, 09:20 PM 2018

Actually it's SAF,  I started with Rock of Gibraltar.  :smile:

Watch my Clan Des Obeaux at Cheltenham.
link:s://:.google.com/amp/s/:.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-legend-sir-alex-11829543.amp

Suspiciously enough, you also know Portuguese very well !

It is okay -- you can admit your true identity, Jose.

Don't worry -- we won't report your gambling activities to the FA.

Just tone down the bus parking a bit, especially at home, will ya?  >:D    >:D
What is the fastest way of destroying your bankroll at the casino?

Play roulette with GLC's progressions.

Apolloo

Good stuff TINSOLDIER.

i play exactly like sentinel3 but only 2 games per session. Max 2 sessions a day.

I cannot give good enough stats on this yet but im on a 8 win streak since i started playing first 2 games then stop session.

But overall over the past month playing PB in different ways. I have yet to see the first bet qualify past 48th spin. You have seen it go to 51st but I'm pritty sure that is one of those freak events that happen once every 500 or more games.

Hope you go on a nice win streak soon to bring that win/loss up to above 12/1

Thanks
Grind hard with the patience and discipline 👊

cht

Quote from: cht on Feb 09, 09:20 PM 2018
Actually it's SAF,  I started with Rock of Gibraltar.  :smile:

Watch my Clan Des Obeaux at Cheltenham.
link:s://:.google.com/amp/s/:.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-legend-sir-alex-11829543.amp
Won 2000 Guineas from Hawk Wing whose jockey Jamie Spencer rode an awful race. :thumbsup:
link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=yoPW8AigQ00

I think it's time to slide back into the 7billion crowd.  ;D

sentinel3

Quote from: Tinsoldiers on Feb 09, 09:17 PM 2018
My results.

13 days, 65 games. 48 wins and 10 losses. Now what has not been discussed here is, I got 7 games where two ECs qualified. 6 of those games both ECs won and 1 game one won and one lost. So total 72 attempts, 61 wins and 11 losses, 1 loss every 5.5 wins.

Magical first game at 3AM turned out to be worst. 13 games, 10 wins and 2 losses. One game was two qualifiers with 1 in and 1 loss. Total tally 14 attempts and 3 losses putting at 1 loss every 3.6 games.

I got a qualifier for almost all the games within 48 spins except 1 which went to 51 spins. Following is the game history. I will continue to play every day, and I really hope the wins catch up. I REALLY DO. The second column here is the number of spins before the qualifier happens.



Just so that someone can confirm that i playing exactly as described am writing the spins from the last game i played today. Qualifier came in 27th spin in RRR and the next 3 spins were 19, 25 and 21.



Is there anyone here who play exactly as Sentinel describes? What are your results?
TS this is not making sense. One week you are getting 22-1 playing all day. Now you cant even buy 7--1 playing sparingly. Come on man. I dont want to say it. But something just isnt right here.

How do you go from 22-1 to 5.3--1 in a week? And not one weeking streak over 20 games. Virtually impossible playing the revised way.

Where are you playing these games?

Maybe you need to play them on that speed roulette TS ive never experienced such a drop in a week in 11 years.


sentinel3

Quote from: sentinel3 on Feb 10, 12:09 AM 2018
TS this is not making sense. One week you are getting 22-1 playing all day. Now you cant even buy 7--1 playing sparingly. Come on man. I dont want to say it. But something just isnt right here.

How do you go from 22-1 to 5.3--1 in a week? And not one streak over 20 games. Virtually impossible playing the revised way.

Where are you playing these games?

Maybe you need to play them on that speed roulette TS ive never experienced such a drop in a week in 11 years.

sentinel3

Quote from: Tinsoldiers on Feb 09, 09:21 PM 2018
I read your post again. I agree with you and thats what I have been saying as well. There will be winners and losers at both end of the spectrum. But he seems to think differently. He seems to think everyone will win, if they stick their guns and play 200 games like he does. Which i dont sign up to.
TS I wasnt born yesterday this all about you trying to make me look like a liar. Not prove the way I play is better or worse. The mistake you made was telling everyone first you could play 24/7 and hold a winning streak. Nobody INCLUDING ME has ever seen in 11 years. Now all of a sudden you cant even win 6--1 because you happen to be playing LIKE I DO.

Dr Sudoku warned about people like you. I doubt you even played those 450 odd games you claimed you did. You carry on I will carry on winning.


Gandhi

Quote from: Andre Chass on Feb 09, 03:49 PM 2018
I'm playing in a different way.
I wait one of the patterns to form for 3 times and I bet against it. For example:

LHH
LHH
LHH
Bet
HLL

That's my trigger.
Im playing it three times per day using a 4 steps progression 10, 10, 30, 60
No losses so far.

I know some players will say my trigger is a fallacy but If you play against a pattern, would you start for example betting after only one red hit or would you start betting after 15 reds hit? This is my thinking.

R start betting B for 4 times.
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR start betting B for 4 times.

Which one will you choose?

Hey Andre, I've been interested and trying to follow the way you play.
So are you still playing your first game the way you posted earlier? Waiting for four of the same pattern and then betting against it?
eg. RBB - RBB - RBB - RBB - bet BRR

Or the second way you said?
eg. LHH - LHH - LHH - LH - bet L

And then playing this third way that I quoted for the games you play after your first?

Madi

Why  so many conditions to play a winning system. Day or midninght. 4 or 5 games a day? U r winning thats fine we accept that but recommend handful of game to play a day is not making any sense. U also understand that.

denzie

Lets play a childsgame. You know the machine where a head pops out in one  of the holes? Then you need to be quick to smash it with that plastic hammer. Ok....the hammer is called variance....the head is you... :lol:

How will you manage to escape most hits?

By always come out the same hole ?
By trying different holes?

You get my point right ? This method always starts at the same trigger. You might make it (in your head) more impressive by saying the Wheel or random gives the start but.....at the end you always start at the same moment.....which doesnt win over time. Which will give you braindamage  :xd:

:thumbsup:
As spins roll off our predictions get better

blueman

Quote from: Madi on Feb 10, 02:53 AM 2018
Why  so many conditions to play a winning system. Day or midninght. 4 or 5 games a day? U r winning thats fine we accept that but recommend handful of game to play a day is not making any sense. U also understand that.

Hg is that something will not happen + Marti? Of course it will happen !?  Happened to me in the first game, but I played at RNG for a full moon, and I did not kill the chicken with a rusty knife!?  ::)

Google english, sorry.

Tinsoldiers

Quote from: sentinel3 on Feb 10, 12:38 AM 2018
Nobody INCLUDING ME has ever seen in 11 years.
You keep bringing point like nobody including you. Can someone please raise their hands up who is playing exactly the way sentinel has described his play here. You keep bringing Dr sudoku but he has confirmed that he is playing with modifications. cHT claims to win but he is playing with modifications. Is there anyone else playing pattern breaker and getting the same result.  I said I played continuously but not pattern breaker. I used this concept to play 24 sets.  In fact I thank you for helping me identify that game. If it works well and holds after my extensive testing I will post it here for everyone to see.

But for now I will continue my tests. I am a patient man and I can do 200 days.  I can wait even a year to get a golden winning system. This time I will post screenshots from where I play so that everyone can see what I test. I really think you are hiding a secret sauce like everyone here does and you don’t want to share that secret sauce openly.

Proofreaders2000

@all: If you want a standard way to
play Pattern Breaker use this tracker.

Just select PB from the list and input the
numbers.  It will tell you when and what to bet.

*btw It tracks all three Even-Chances simultaneously.



sentinel3

Quote from: Tinsoldiers on Feb 10, 03:35 AM 2018
You keep bringing point like nobody including you. Can someone please raise their hands up who is playing exactly the way sentinel has described his play here. You keep bringing Dr sudoku but he has confirmed that he is playing with modifications. cHT claims to win but he is playing with modifications. Is there anyone else playing pattern breaker and getting the same result.  I said I played continuously but not pattern breaker. I used this concept to play 24 sets.  In fact I thank you for helping me identify that game. If it works well and holds after my extensive testing I will post it here for everyone to see.

But for now I will continue my tests. I am a patient man and I can do 200 days.  I can wait even a year to get a golden winning system. This time I will post screenshots from where I play so that everyone can see what I test. I really think you are hiding a secret sauce like everyone here does and you don’t want to share that secret sauce openly.
What do you mean 24 sets?

You never explained that properly. I took that to mean 24 games of Pattern breaker. Heres the thing TS. You will ultimately say you cant win with pattern breaker. I already know that.

You and Denzie are people who will claim what you do works. But not anyone else.

There are no secrets. I won my 29th consecutive first game of the day this morning at 5.30am. ON LADBROKES.my 27th overall. The only detail I can think of that i didnt reveal is I start from a 10 number count..That means when I log into Ladbrokes each morning. I take the 10 numbers already there and use them to start striking off patterns.

I maintain this practice on all sites. Some will have 14 numbers on the number board when you log in. So I count back TEN NUMBERS and go from there. If theres a zero in the mix I count around it.

Thats the only thing I didnt make clear before. I track all 3 even chances as I said in the revision. Until the first one qualifies. Twin qualifiers VOID THE GAME.

Over the 410 games I have now played since the revision. The average qualification time is 36 spins per game. At the two extremes. Some games qualify in 21 spins (4 so far from 410) Some go to 48 spins (5 so far) the longest its taken out of 410 games to close the first pattern 7. Identifying another power point that i am now exploiting.

So there is no secret no special sauce. Im running at 16.3 to 1 as I write this.

You also have to understand no two games are played on the same site (wheel) maybe thats a factor. Jumping in and out of the cycle in its purest form.

-