*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sentinel3]

Ok thanks .So on average your making a bet every 24 minutes .

On average because you always take the first 10 numbers on the board when you log in. An average game takes 15 to 20 minutes.

[Apolloo]

I still expect the worst to happen...when we have built a nice bankroll for 3,4 weeks theres no point in risking high recovery bets risking say 5,10,20 (-35) to see that double of triple loss.

The only recovery bets i do..

Game 1
E/O  lost  (-7u)

* Retrack 10 spins

Game 2
R/B.   win (+1)
Wait for the E/O bet to come as we lost on previous game.
E/O. (recovery*2)  win (+2u)

So little recovery there!!

Also if i see 2 losses in a row e.g

Game 1
R/B   loss  (-7u)

Retrack 10 spins

Game 2
H/L.   loss. (-7u)

Retrack 10 spins

Game 3
O/E (recovery*2) win (+2u)


Thanks

[thelaw]

The win rate just got SERIOUS.

I have been playing this game for 11 years in June. My alltime winning streak was 46 straight games. Set playing just HIGH LOW. Back in September of 2010.

Its taken me nearly 7.5 years to top it. If anything was gonna do it. It is PATTERN BREAKER REVISED. A new mark has been set.

🛑🛑🛑47 GAMES IN A ROW🛑🛑🛑

Now im going to try for 50. I just cant believe this myself. It was always threatening a monster streak. Because these days there are no close losses. I lose I win 12. I lose I win 17. I lose I win 47! This has stunned even me...

If there are so many streaks, then what about using a reverse Labouchere and breaking the bank?

[RouletteGhost]

Sentinel,

In all your years have you ever had two LLL back to back?

I’m thinking, on a loss, because it will happen jump to the next EC with recovery units.

[Baelog]

Tracker for PB Revised.

Baelog

[sentinel3]

Sentinel,

In all your years have you ever had two LLL back to back?

I’m thinking, on a loss, because it will happen jump to the next EC with recovery units.

Hi with the original HL yes several times.

With PATTERN BREAKER REVISED. Ive had 28 losses in 450 GAMES. ZERO BACK TO BACK LOSSES.


And at the moment RG. I cant even land on a single loss. Ive just extended the Record to.

🛑🛑🛑50 GAMES IN A ROW🛑🛑🛑

This truly is a dream run, that may never happen again. I better make the most of it. 50/0.

[RouletteGhost]

If no back to back loss continues then continuing to play after a loss on the next qualifying EC with recovery units sounds good to me.

[sentinel3]

If no back to back loss continues then continuing to play after a loss on the next qualifying EC with recovery units sounds good to me.

If you are talking about two losses within a set its happened 4 times RG.

Im talking about two different sets. Theres never been two losses in a row from two different sets.

[ice789]

Hi Herby,
I am new to this forum also and have read most of the pages on this thread. You are correct in the early days of the formation of this system the rules kept bouncing around a bit. But this was because the originators were testing the ideas and found from their live play that the system needed to be tweaked. One observation JL made was that of all his losses from 2600 odd games of playing PB the losses mostly came after 45+ spins. The possible cause of this was the one remaining pattern that had not presented itself was now more "DUE" to come. Although you can't predict what random is going to do, this situation should be approached with caution. So one tweak JL suggests is that in this situation you would be better off betting for the pattern to show. But, as you suggest you still have 8 possibilities for the next three spins to show so as long as you match one of the spins with your bet you will win. What this system does though is it forces the casino to pick a lock created by its own history not by your random selection. So, to beat you, the wheel has to get its timing perfect rather than you get your timing perfect. You just follow the rules. Most times you should win. But as I posted in my previous post you can get days when random feels like its reading your mind and taking you to the cleaners.
As mentioned in this thread and probably goes for every method created, you cannot beat roulette with one method alone playing continuously. You will either need to play it in a hit and run mode or switch systems after making a quick profit. So play a few good systems in your sessions and you should end up ahead. But as I have witnessed many times impatience is the killer of any system. If you do not  have the discipline and patience to wait out the bad streaks you will go home a loser.
If you look back at my recent posts I have been posting some charts of my BOT testing with the goal of turning $1K into $100K using PB alone. If this works then it will be a sound system to use in your everyday play. But as I mentioned one system alone cannot beat the game if you are playing yourself.
More results posted shortly.

I have already built PB in a BOT to test this method on live play and although it is winning and losing its the best method I have seen for making large profits.
The rules I use are:
1. Track all 8 patterns and wait for the last pattern left
2. If the number of spins to get to this last pattern is less than 45 (or 15 sets of 3) then bet for the last pattern else bet against the last pattern
3. Use a progression system that allows you to recover. I use a D'Alembert progression rather than Martingale as I am playing continuously in my BOT and need to stay in the game and withstand a long string of losses before recovering. My progression is 1 2 3 4 5 6 Units. Up if I lose, down if I win.
4. I track all 3 E/C (H-L, O-E, B-R)
5. For O-E I also bet the 4th Pattern will not match the 1st pattern
6. Finally, on all my systems, I cover the Zero bet placing about 5% of my E/B on it and adjusting the progression to recover the Zero Bet on the E/C. eg $50 on E/C and $5 on Zero. This nets up yo 3 times my outlay if and WHEN it hits.

Cheers,
Ricky

AFTER 45 SPINS NO BET ?

BET AGIANS 1 PATERN NO SHOW ONLY 45 SPINS ?

SORRY I SPEAK ENGLISH LITTLE

[bikemotorman]

Wow, thats a great long post-Bravo.

Guys, I am still tired from testing PB from a few days ago LOL.

Stuart

Roulette Ghost give me a ring about bubble Craps.

I had an idea about the Bubble Craps machine we were talking about.

[keepontryin]

ricky you said most losses to pb came after 45 plus spins yet you say when less then 45 bet for same if more bet for different............but doesnt pb play for different...... so what do you mean?

[bikemotorman]

Hey guys whatever happened to Jebet.com I used to play a lot on that site I think its the same as dublinbet.com but now its gone??

Stuart

[RouletteGhost]

As a craft beer guy I HAD to have this

[Ricky]

AFTER 45 SPINS NO BET ?

BET AGIANS 1 PATERN NO SHOW ONLY 45 SPINS ?

SORRY I SPEAK ENGLISH LITTLE

Hi all,
since I wrote my original post on the PB rules I use in my bot I have revised them to play more consistent with how others are playing especially with the progression. So here are my current rules I use:

1. Track all 8 patterns of ALL E/C and wait for the last pattern remaining of the FIRST E/C to qualify. Eg if of all E/C H/L has matched 5 patterns, E/O has matched 6 patterns and B/R has matched 7 patterns, then I choose B/R to bet the next 3 spins.

2.  If the number of spins to get to this last pattern is less than 45 (or 15 sets of 3) then I bet FOR the last pattern else I bet AGAINST the last pattern. eg if the last pattern remaining is BBB and the number of spins to get to this point is 42 then I bet RRR. But if the number of spins is >=45 i bet BBB (with the last pattern). The reason for this is that it has taken a very long time for this pattern to not come out so it is probably more due to come. Again this is a personal preference and is an OPTIONAL rule.

3.  Use a progression system that allows you to recover. Since I have found PB wins more times than it loses I am not expecting long losing streaks so have settled with the 3 step Martingale originally defined in JL's rules and I only cover the Zero on the 3rd Bet. So my progression is now:
Normal Bet : 1,2,5+1(Zero)
Recovery Bet: 4,8,18+2(Zero)
So I add an extra 1 (or 2 in recovery) to the E/C bet to cover the Zero Bet on the 3rd step. I also put 1 unit (or 2 in recovery) straight up on the Zero

4. As mentioned in RULE 1, I track all 3 E/C (H-L, O-E, B-R). However, I reset all trackers after a win on any E/C bet. I immediately start tracking from the beginning

5. I have an optional side bet in my setup to allow you to choose to bet the 4th Pattern will NOT match the 1st pattern as discussed in this forum. To choose which E/C pattern I bet AGAINST I use a random selection so as not to bet on the same E/C bet in each session for this side bet. In the original rules I posted I was only using E/O. So on the 4th set of 3 spins I bet against either the 1st B/R, H/L or O/E. Whether the bet wins or loses I continue tracking the patterns until the end. In this way we have a possibility of winning twice for each session we track. If this side bet loses I go into recovery mode for the next 2 bets.

6. Finally, as mentioned in RULE 3, I only cover the Zero on the 3rd step. The reason for  this is Zero does not come out as often and PB has a high strike rate on E/C so I am maximizing my return and minimizing my risk by not betting on Zero for 2/3 steps in the progression. If I am taken to the last step in the progression it makes sense to cover the Zero as this is the highest bet and we would not want to lose it due to Zero hitting.

PS. There is a bit of interest for me to share the Roulette Xtreme system design for PB. I will share this next week as I am grateful for those on this forum freely sharing their ideas and helping me realize my dream. You will require a copy of Roulette Xtreme to run it. Its available at link:://uxsoftware.com if you are interested . However, I just need to clean up the code a little before releasing. The design will be specific for PB and MV7.
Also, there is some logic added that I have not shared with the forum which is being tested. This relates to the 7th Pattern. I will leave it to Sentinel to determine if I should include or remove this logic as it was his idea. But I am not sure if he has shared this with the forum yet.

regards,
Ricky

[Ricky]

My winning streak stands at an incredible 44 straight games. Only one streak overall stands above it now. 46 games. Set in 2010.

PB (Revised) is looking good in Continuous play. It will be interesting, since I am playing for like 8 hours a day continuously, to see if it can beat this record.

cheers,
Ricky