*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Ricky]

PS: I only bet two patterns

BPP or PBB

I'm not betting BBP and PPB  because I realized it doesn't work.

Hi Andre,
what do you mean these two patterns aren't working for you? Are you getting a lot of losses or winning on 2nd step meaning no profit?

So these two patterns BBP and PBB  would require you to bet PBP and PPB respectively. So are you saying that betting the first step on P or B and then being forced to change to B or P for next two steps is not showing profit.

I must say they 4 times I have played your method which is proving to be very rare indeed, I have had 4 wins with the following patterns to bet against
BPB   after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
BPB  after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
Only the second bet went to the 2nd step resulting in a break even. Other 3 bets were won on the first step.

So this does NOT correlates to your selection of two patterns.

I will leave it to the 4 patterns for now and report my results.

Cheers,
Ricky

[Ricky]

Hi Andre,
what do you mean these two patterns aren't working for you? Are you getting a lot of losses or winning on 2nd step meaning no profit?

So these two patterns BBP and PBB  would require you to bet PBP and PPB respectively. So are you saying that betting the first step on P or B and then being forced to change to B or P for next two steps is not showing profit.

I must say they 4 times I have played your method which is proving to be very rare indeed, I have had 4 wins with the following patterns to bet against
BPB   after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
BPB  after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
Only the second bet went to the 2nd step resulting in a break even. Other 3 bets were won on the first step.

So this does NOT correlates to your selection of two patterns.

I will leave it to the 4 patterns for now and report my results.

Cheers,
Ricky

CORRECTION
Its getting late Im seeing too many Bs and Ps
I meant to say my results are correlating to your. I have not been challenged yet on the two patterns BBP and PPB you have stopped tracking.
The above games bets I reported were betting against PBB and BPP respectively and I won them all.

But using the original PATTERN BREAKER method I am finding more opportunities to bet and am now on a 22 game winning streak on my Online Casino. But I must admit I had 8 wins and 1 loss at my BM casino today using my modified 2 step approach I described earlier today. But since I switched to this 2 step method on my Online Casino I am 5-0
Altogether with Andre method and original I am now  27-0 on online casino.

Also, just got my 150 euro withdrawal approved so expect to see that depositied into my account in next few day.

Good news overall.

My fighting fund for my Challenge at my BM Casino is now $678. I am now starting to use the 3 step 0-1-2 progression with a $25 base bet risking $75. I will keep track if this is working for me without back to back losses. I am expecting to get to $1,000 in the next few visits.

Cheers
Ricky
regards

[Winner]

And, yes, bet selection matters.

Some bet selections are simply better than others (even if we cannot explain the reasons for that disparity -- it could be the layout of the numbers on the wheel or some other factor).
[/quote
All bet selection are the same .there is no superior selection . I've tried them all

[Ricky]

We all want a method that can work flat betting.

Hi Doctor,
I have been observing the tendencies in my baccarat play to see which side dominates. Apart from seeing the occasional 12 ties in one shoe it is pretty much an even battle most times between which side dominates. Sometimes they switch from one side to the other during the shoe. But there are occasional shoes that will show like 30-7 in favour of banker or player. So something like the Norman Leigh Attack using Reverse Labouchere can generate the occasional profit. But most times I find when I tried it it was a grind. You would make 8-15 units and then lose it again when the imbalance corrected. So the only way to take advantage is to set a profit target and then reset the sequence 1-1-1-1 when it is met. Also set a stop loss in case you get too far behind.

But flat betting will not generate too much profit in this near 50/50 game. The only method that is proving POWERFUL for me  so far is PATTERN BREAKER even with a 2 step progression and 3 unit risk.

This is why I truly believe that PATTERN BREAKER will prove to be the closest thing to one component of a Holy Grail system together with DISCIPLINE and PATIENCE that you will ever see. Sounds crazy I know that a simple strategy can claim to have so much success but what those that play it MUST also have is TRUST in the method over 100 games. Sure it will lose but over 100 games it will consistently show a profit. Enough profit to rely on this method as a secure source of income and revenue.

Just to summarize with 3 step 1-2-4 progression it requires 7 wins to 1 loss for break-even meaning you need to achieve 84:12 win:loss ratio assuming no DOUBLE Losses and no recovery. With recover of 2-4-8 for 2 games after loss you can achieve profit with 84:12 win:loss

But with  the 2 step progression 1-2 being deployed, which saves you 4 units for each loss, you only need 3 wins for each loss for break-even meaning 75:25 win:loss ratio assuming no recovery. As you only need to recover 3 units you can either deploy 2-4 for 1 recovery game or not use recovery at all and still have good chance of profit after 100 games.

As I mentioned I am 27 wins so far achieved in mostly 1 or 2 steps. Only once I went to 3rd step in this current streak so in reality I am 26-1 for 2 steps only. I am on track to show a profit after 100 games.

No the trick will be to remain DISCIPLINE and PATIENT enough over the coming months to manage my Bankroll wisely and continue with 100 game profits. This is why I am continually reporting my results on this forum because I do not trust myself to stay focused on my own. This way I am accountable to be true to the forum and will continue to make sensible decisions. Its also good to get the good and bad criticism so I can be challenged when needed and learn from the ideas of others.

Cheers
Ricky.

[DoctorSudoku]

All bet selection are the same .there is no superior selection .

I've tried them all

Hope the above claim applies to your genius messiah's repeaters method as well.

[DoctorSudoku]

Hi Doctor,

I have been observing the tendencies in my baccarat play to see which side dominates. Apart from seeing the occasional 12 ties in one shoe it is pretty much an even battle most times between which side dominates. Sometimes they switch from one side to the other during the shoe. But there are occasional shoes that will show like 30-7 in favour of banker or player. So something like the Norman Leigh Attack using Reverse Labouchere can generate the occasional profit. But most times I find when I tried it it was a grind. You would make 8-15 units and then lose it again when the imbalance corrected. So the only way to take advantage is to set a profit target and then reset the sequence 1-1-1-1 when it is met. Also set a stop loss in case you get too far behind.

But flat betting will not generate too much profit in this near 50/50 game. The only method that is proving POWERFUL for me  so far is PATTERN BREAKER even with a 2 step progression and 3 unit risk.

This is why I truly believe that PATTERN BREAKER will prove to be the closest thing to one component of a Holy Grail system together with DISCIPLINE and PATIENCE that you will ever see.

Sounds crazy I know that a simple strategy can claim to have so much success but what those that play it MUST also have is TRUST in the method over 100 games. Sure it will lose but over 100 games it will consistently show a profit. Enough profit to rely on this method as a secure source of income and revenue.

Just to summarize with 3 step 1-2-4 progression it requires 7 wins to 1 loss for break-even meaning you need to achieve 84:12 win:loss ratio assuming no DOUBLE Losses and no recovery. With recover of 2-4-8 for 2 games after loss you can achieve profit with 84:12 win:loss

But with  the 2 step progression 1-2 being deployed, which saves you 4 units for each loss, you only need 3 wins for each loss for break-even meaning 75:25 win:loss ratio assuming no recovery. As you only need to recover 3 units you can either deploy 2-4 for 1 recovery game or not use recovery at all and still have good chance of profit after 100 games.

As I mentioned I am 27 wins so far achieved in mostly 1 or 2 steps. Only once I went to 3rd step in this current streak so in reality I am 26-1 for 2 steps only. I am on track to show a profit after 100 games.

No the trick will be to remain DISCIPLINE and PATIENT enough over the coming months to manage my Bankroll wisely and continue with 100 game profits. This is why I am continually reporting my results on this forum because I do not trust myself to stay focused on my own. This way I am accountable to be true to the forum and will continue to make sensible decisions. Its also good to get the good and bad criticism so I can be challenged when needed and learn from the ideas of others.

Cheers
Ricky.

Ricky,
Good post.

I want to make a general suggestion that maybe you can build on.

It is this:
PB is a typical bet-against-certain-rare-patterns method.

There are other methods that bet against certain rare patterns that work as well.

So try applying that thinking to devising other similar methods.

Two caveats / suggestions:

1. EC methods based on the above idea tend to be more practical than similar methods that involve double dozens or double columns (primarily because of the 1:2 payout).

2. If flat betting does not produce profits on a consistent basis, then any negative progression used in conjunction with such a method should be one that is  both mild and short.

Trust me, you will find this to be a fascinating and fertile area of roulette research !

[Ricky]

But some of the general pieces of betting advice that he doles out is very sound.

OK I started doing some research on Ellis Davis and found this statement of his at link:://:.casinoforum.club/finally-the-truth-about-baccarat-by-e-clifton-davis/  which I can verify at my BM casino is plausable

"OK, here is what you are up against. The cards are fixed. Worse, they are not all fixed the same way. But, “factory preshuffled” cards are fixed in card orders the casinos deem favorable to them."

I witnessed a new deck of cards being unwrapped from packaging at a $100 table and it went straight in the shoe pre-shuffled. No shuffle machine. So it was obviously pre-shuffled at the factory. These Baccarat players have no idea what they are up against.

This scenario is opposed to my Online casino which I see is hand shuffled after each shoe and you can see the cards being dealt. So my results are based on this true random shuffle. When I am next at my BM casino I will double check the Rapid Baccarat games to see how they are shuffled as these cards are reused after each shoe. I suspect it is a Shuffle Master of some kind. But these can also shuffle the cards in a certain order.

So I will be very careful in my game play to ensure I am playing PATTERN BREAKER on the most favourable conditions to ensure random is as random as possible.

At this point I am seeing SicBo as being the best option. Funny that as I would have expected it to be one of the worst games to beat. But when you have 3 small dice in a dome being tossed in the air and hitting the sides of glass, you cannot get any more random than that. It is actually 3 random events taking place simultaneously to form random number from the sum of three random events.

Cheers,
Ricky

[cht]

Today while toying around I realise I can use PB to unravel repeaters play vv. This time I played a repeaters game of 500 spins with approx. 150 units per game flat bet and it gave a profit of 1985 units profit. I can't post the game chart because the 'show stats' icon went faulty not giving the chart. Maybe another time. Anyway this is amazing breakthrough for both systems.

[Winner]

Hope the above claim applies to your genius messiah's repeaters method as well.

To all. I'm not trying to be negative. It's a fact 

[Ricky]

Ricky,
Good post.

I want to make a general suggestion that maybe you can build on.

It is this:
PB is a typical bet-against-certain-rare-patterns method.

There are other methods that bet against certain rare patterns that work as well.

So try applying that thinking to devising other similar methods.

Two caveats / suggestions:

1. EC methods based on the above idea tend to be more practical than similar methods that involve double dozens or double columns (primarily because of the 1:2 payout).

2. If flat betting does not produce profits on a consistent basis, then any negative progression used in conjunction with such a method should be one that is  both mild and short.

Trust me, you will find this to be a fascinating and fertile area of roulette research !

Hi Doctor,
I totally agree with your summation. Yes, i am sure there are other similar methods based on "bet-against-certain-rare-patterns". The key is to find the ones that are the rarest but also changes on each bet selection. You cannot constantly look for the same rare pattern to bet against. You need random to choose it for you. So far PB is the only idea I have come across that does this. Sure there are other methods mentioned like MV7 etc that do this but for simplicity sake PB is very playable. You could do something similar, and I have to some degree of success, and get random number generator to select one of 8 choices. You then bet against that pattern not forming when you decide to bet. I am sure it would on occasion, if not often, have the same strike rate as PB. But I like the way PB creates the choice for you using the game itself. This leaves no room to blame your random number generator or your own bad luck. It then is the luck of the wheel or deck order that bet you on that game.

Cheers,
Ricky

[cht]

Today while toying around I realise I can use PB to unravel repeaters play vv. This time I played a repeaters game of 500 spins with approx. 150 units per game flat bet and it gave a profit of 1985 units profit. I can't post the game chart because the 'show stats' icon went faulty not giving the chart. Maybe another time. Anyway this is amazing breakthrough for both systems.

What's amazing is it is based on flatbet with minimal drawdown. I checked it on excel then played it on roulettesimulator expecting the same result and yes it did - although both are rng. So now to test it on real live spins.

Let repeaters chose the pattern and play the repeaters to close out the pattern. When pattern formed play PB immediately. Great results for both repeaters and PBAndre.

[Apolloo]

Hi guys,

liking the idea of the ,1,2 prog against the 4 set off patterns. like doc said there is other patterns to play. as we know with MV7 patterns can go on and on to repeat 7 times in a row.

But if we sticking to the exact patterns we have written down before we play it can be differnt....and like in the table below only play against patterns with double ends.... if playing the bottom set of patterns with 2 diff ECs.

Only problem is keeping track of them all. Maybe too complicated to play for real.

Surley a higher hit rate than 3--1... so a loss now and again is fine.

cheers

[Winner]

Hi guys,

liking the idea of the ,1,2 prog against the 4 set off patterns. like doc said there is other patterns to play. as we know with MV7 patterns can go on and on to repeat 7 times in a row.

But if we sticking to the exact patterns we have written down before we play it can be differnt....and like in the table below only play against patterns with double ends.... if playing the bottom set of patterns with 2 diff ECs.

Only problem is keeping track of them all. Maybe too complicated to play for real.

Cheers
[/quot
You'll make a lot of mistakes and it will cost you. But what the hell do I know .only playing this game for over 10 years.

[Ricky]

Hi guys,

liking the idea of the ,1,2 prog against the 4 set off patterns. like doc said there is other patterns to play. as we know with MV7 patterns can go on and on to repeat 7 times in a row.

But if we sticking to the exact patterns we have written down before we play it can be differnt....and like in the table below only play against patterns with double ends.... if playing the bottom set of patterns with 2 diff ECs.

Only problem is keeping track of them all. Maybe too complicated to play for real.

Surley a higher hit rate than 3--1... so a loss now and again is fine.

cheers

Hi Apolloo,
Can you explain a bit more about what you are doing with these patterns. I just want to be sure I have your idea understood

Cheers,
Ricky

[Apolloo]

Hi Ricky, yeah its just as andreas play.... playing against seening RBB RBB RBB RBB formining within our 3 set matrix.

But as we know it can take alot of time to get that trigger, so if we want to play only the 2 step progression... this can take even longer to get our trigger. so by adding the extra patterns to play agaisnt it could be better.

Example.

HRR
HRR
HRR
H  ------Trigger to bet agaisnt HRR forming for 4th time in a row so now bet   ----  BB  with  1,2 prog.


But id suggest if was playing with more patterns, only play with ones you have written down beforehand... and only ones with double ends. not just any pattern that forms while playing becuse as we know can go on and on repeating.