*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Ricky]

Hi Ricky, yeah its just as andreas play.... playing against seening RBB RBB RBB RBB formining within our 3 set matrix.

But as we know it can take alot of time to get that trigger, so if we want to play only the 2 step progression... this can take even longer to get our trigger. so by adding the extra patterns to play agaisnt it could be better.

Example.

HRR
HRR
HRR
H  ------Trigger to bet agaisnt HRR forming for 4th time in a row so now bet   ----  BB  with  1,2 prog.


But id suggest if was playing with more patterns, only play with ones you have written down beforehand... and only ones with double ends. not just any pattern that forms while playing becuse as we know can go on and on repeating.

Thanks Apolloo. That explains the strategy.

One thing, maybe Andre can  confirm and does not relate to this example you have given.  You mention you put the results in sequences of 3 as you have shown. But In Baccarat Play Andre mentions he does not group the results but just takes the last eight results and looks for the repeating pattern. I am finding this method very difficult to track at BM casino playing Baccarat. So I am not sure how Andre manually tracks 6 tables simultaneously.

Cheers,
Ricky

[Ricky]

OK I started doing some research on Ellis Davis and found this statement of his at link:://:.casinoforum.club/finally-the-truth-about-baccarat-by-e-clifton-davis/  which I can verify at my BM casino is plausable

"OK, here is what you are up against. The cards are fixed. Worse, they are not all fixed the same way. But, “factory preshuffled” cards are fixed in card orders the casinos deem favorable to them."

I witnessed a new deck of cards being unwrapped from packaging at a $100 table and it went straight in the shoe pre-shuffled. No shuffle machine. So it was obviously pre-shuffled at the factory. These Baccarat players have no idea what they are up against.

This scenario is opposed to my Online casino which I see is hand shuffled after each shoe and you can see the cards being dealt. So my results are based on this true random shuffle. When I am next at my BM casino I will double check the Rapid Baccarat games to see how they are shuffled as these cards are reused after each shoe. I suspect it is a Shuffle Master of some kind. But these can also shuffle the cards in a certain order.

So I will be very careful in my game play to ensure I am playing PATTERN BREAKER on the most favourable conditions to ensure random is as random as possible.

At this point I am seeing SicBo as being the best option. Funny that as I would have expected it to be one of the worst games to beat. But when you have 3 small dice in a dome being tossed in the air and hitting the sides of glass, you cannot get any more random than that. It is actually 3 random events taking place simultaneously to form random number from the sum of three random events.

Cheers,
Ricky

Reading Ellis's strategy in this article really confirms to me how simple PATTERN BREAKER is compared to what he is trying to SELL as a WINNING strategy making his students millions. Once statement he makes is:

How hard is it to learn?

Some of our sharpies grasp the whole concept virtually overnight.

But for us mortals it takes some study.

Nothing we do is the least bit difficult but we do a LOT.

Maybe his potential students should come over to this forum and do some simple studying of their own and try out PATTERN BREAKER with this no brainer method that can be learnt by a 3 year old

Cheers,
Ricky

[Apolloo]

These will be a little easier to track!!

[sentinel3]

Hi Doctor,
I have been observing the tendencies in my baccarat play to see which side dominates. Apart from seeing the occasional 12 ties in one shoe it is pretty much an even battle most times between which side dominates. Sometimes they switch from one side to the other during the shoe. But there are occasional shoes that will show like 30-7 in favour of banker or player. So something like the Norman Leigh Attack using Reverse Labouchere can generate the occasional profit. But most times I find when I tried it it was a grind. You would make 8-15 units and then lose it again when the imbalance corrected. So the only way to take advantage is to set a profit target and then reset the sequence 1-1-1-1 when it is met. Also set a stop loss in case you get too far behind.

But flat betting will not generate too much profit in this near 50/50 game. The only method that is proving POWERFUL for me  so far is PATTERN BREAKER even with a 2 step progression and 3 unit risk.

This is why I truly believe that PATTERN BREAKER will prove to be the closest thing to one component of a Holy Grail system together with DISCIPLINE and PATIENCE that you will ever see. Sounds crazy I know that a simple strategy can claim to have so much success but what those that play it MUST also have is TRUST in the method over 100 games. Sure it will lose but over 100 games it will consistently show a profit. Enough profit to rely on this method as a secure source of income and revenue.

Just to summarize with 3 step 1-2-4 progression it requires 7 wins to 1 loss for break-even meaning you need to achieve 84:12 win:loss ratio assuming no DOUBLE Losses and no recovery. With recover of 2-4-8 for 2 games after loss you can achieve profit with 84:12 win:loss

But with  the 2 step progression 1-2 being deployed, which saves you 4 units for each loss, you only need 3 wins for each loss for break-even meaning 75:25 win:loss ratio assuming no recovery. As you only need to recover 3 units you can either deploy 2-4 for 1 recovery game or not use recovery at all and still have good chance of profit after 100 games.

As I mentioned I am 27 wins so far achieved in mostly 1 or 2 steps. Only once I went to 3rd step in this current streak so in reality I am 26-1 for 2 steps only. I am on track to show a profit after 100 games.

No the trick will be to remain DISCIPLINE and PATIENT enough over the coming months to manage my Bankroll wisely and continue with 100 game profits. This is why I am continually reporting my results on this forum because I do not trust myself to stay focused on my own. This way I am accountable to be true to the forum and will continue to make sensible decisions. Its also good to get the good and bad criticism so I can be challenged when needed and learn from the ideas of others.

Cheers
Ricky.

100 game sets is where its at Ricky. Once you have that discipline and patience mastered. You will have this game of Baccarat, Roulette beaten longterm for life.

The price is ALWAYS two qualities few possess. PATIENCE AND DISCIPLINE.

[Andre Chass]

Thanks Apolloo. That explains the strategy.

One thing, maybe Andre can  confirm and does not relate to this example you have given.  You mention you put the results in sequences of 3 as you have shown. But In Baccarat Play Andre mentions he does not group the results but just takes the last eight results and looks for the repeating pattern. I am finding this method very difficult to track at BM casino playing Baccarat. So I am not sure how Andre manually tracks 6 tables simultaneously.

Cheers,
Ricky

Hi

That's the way how I track

red=banker  blue =player

[cht]

It's easy to track it on the main road.

[Andre Chass]

Andre,

The 1 1 3 6 progression is, of course, a very bold one.

From your limited collection of statistics so far, in what percentage of triggers/games, have you been forced to go to that level?

I think around 20 games or more.

As I said before I've never seen a pattern forming for 4 times. So. I never lose using the trigger I'm using.

[Andre Chass]

Hi Andre,
what do you mean these two patterns aren't working for you? Are you getting a lot of losses or winning on 2nd step meaning no profit?

So these two patterns BBP and PBB  would require you to bet PBP and PPB respectively. So are you saying that betting the first step on P or B and then being forced to change to B or P for next two steps is not showing profit.

I must say they 4 times I have played your method which is proving to be very rare indeed, I have had 4 wins with the following patterns to bet against
BPB   after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
BPB  after pattern PBB PBB PB formed
PBP after pattern BPP BPP BP formed
Only the second bet went to the 2nd step resulting in a break even. Other 3 bets were won on the first step.

So this does NOT correlates to your selection of two patterns.

I will leave it to the 4 patterns for now and report my results.

Cheers,
Ricky

Ricky

For some reason I realized betting only BPP or PBB work better.

You have to adapt your style of play and figure out what works better to you.

[iar000]

what BPP or PBB means .....

can you make an example please how to play

thank you

[bikemotorman]

Some guy showed me this yesterday does it look strange, I am a horrible math guy.
120
110
100
90
80
70
60 Start here on a loss go up on a win go down in US dollars.
50
40
30
20
10

He said in a 50 50 game it cant lose but I said what about the best bet selection he said player-banker who cares pick one.
I said no that's too simple so I used it with PB while I kept an eye on my missing patterns.
Oh and on bet phoenix player was on fire today, 65 percent were player for at least an hour.

Never buck a trend swim with the current not against it.

Stuart

[keepontryin]

cant lose???.............................IMPOSSIBLE........time to move on

[bikemotorman]

cant lose???.............................IMPOSSIBLE........time to move on

I did not say that the guy who was trying to sell me some system that is most likely on the forum somewhere said that but it seems fun to play with a good bet selection on Baccarat.

Stuart

[DoctorSudoku]

Some guy showed me this yesterday does it look strange, I am a horrible math guy.
120
110
100
90
80
70
60 Start here on a loss go up on a win go down in US dollars.
50
40
30
20
10


He said in a 50 50 game it cant lose but I said what about the best bet selection he said player-banker who cares pick one.
I said no that's too simple so I used it with PB while I kept an eye on my missing patterns.
Oh and on bet phoenix player was on fire today, 65 percent were player for at least an hour.

Never buck a trend swim with the current not against it.

Stuart

Stuart,
The progression that you listed above actually has a name.

It is the Ascot progression. 

You start in the middle and go up one step on a win and go down one step on a loss.

It has some similarities to the Contra D'Alembert progression -- the principle difference is that in the
Contra D'Alembert progression you start out with the lowest number (usually, 1 unit), whereas with the Ascot progression here you start out in the middle.

It does NOT have to be the above sequence of numbers that this guy gave you.

You can create your own list of numbers and apply the above principle.

It is good for EC bets.

You can try it -- it is definitely better than any doubling up negative progression strategy.

[DoctorSudoku]

Stuart,
The progression that you listed above actually has a name.

It is the Ascot progression. 

You start in the middle and go up one step on a win and go down one step on a loss.

It has some similarities to the Contra D'Alembert progression -- the principle difference is that in the
Contra D'Alembert progression you start out with the lowest number (usually, 1 unit), whereas with the Ascot progression here you start out in the middle.

It does NOT have to be the above sequence of numbers that this guy gave you.

You can create your own list of numbers and apply the above principle.

It is good for EC bets.

You can try it -- it is definitely better than any doubling up negative progression strategy.

Another point:
The biggest problem of the Ascot progression is that any alternating sequence (that is up and down sequence) of wins and losses will adversely affect any profit targets that you may have set before starting the Ascot progression.

[Roulettebeater]

guys,

have you tested this method flatbetting?

i have found a strong pattern but a bit more complex than this and it's showed good result flatbetting.