*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sturrock]

Just played Pattern Breaker backwards forwards upside down inside out LOST LOST LOST 

[Andre Chass]

Incredibly lucky since 07 ? 

Andre Chass has never seen a 'real' loss.

I have seen losses, lots of them actually. 

I have no reason to lie. Im part of this forum to help and get help. I have better things to do in life than to come here in this forum to deceive others. I'm not a sick crazy guy trying  misleading people.
My goal is make money playing.

I play with my rules.
I've never seen the two patterns forming for four times and this factor makes me win.

But I don't care anymore what others think about me and my way of playing.

As a tv series always said: Believe it or not!

[DoctorSudoku]

Just played Pattern Breaker backwards forwards upside down inside out LOST LOST LOST 

Good for you. You can now go and play the repeaters method to your heart's content where you will almost always win, according to a certain roulette genius.      

[Apolloo]

Hit and run no more than 2 games per session, playing 100 game sets.
How many losses did you get??
88--12.   (+4u)
87--13.   (-4u)
86--14.   (-12u)

What were your results... To the people who says its LOST LOST LOST.

im taking a break from playing atm for a good couple of months. As i got my initial £40 bankroll to £250 in 2 months playing PB.... had a blip and lost my discipline and started betting on the layout ... Not doing to lie
-_-

I realise now that i should of risen the unit stakes to atleast £3 units... I was still playing at £1 units     we live and learn ay!!

Cheers

[cht]

I have no reason to lie. Im part of this forum to help and get help. I have better things to do in life than to come here in this forum to deceive others. I'm not a sick crazy guy trying  misleading people.
My goal is make money playing.

I play with my rules.
I've never seen the two patterns forming for four times and this factor makes me win.

But I don't care anymore what others think about me and my way of playing.

As a tv series always said: Believe it or not!

It appears at an average rate of 1-2 times every 100 shoes.

[DoctorSudoku]

I have no reason to lie. Im part of this forum to help and get help. I have better things to do in life than to come here in this forum to deceive others. I'm not a sick crazy guy trying  misleading people.
My goal is make money playing.

I play with my rules.
I've never seen the two patterns forming for four times and this factor makes me win.

But I don't care anymore what others think about me and my way of playing.

As a tv series always said: Believe it or not!

Andre,
I have said this before -- don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the naysayers are saying.

Just do your stuff -- as long as it wins, that's all that matters.

Regarding your method, I think it might be even more loss-resistant than JL's original PB.

I have started paper testing it with my collection of real dealer-spun and airball spins.

I will have a better idea of how this method fares in another 2-4 weeks.

As of now, my main issue has to do with the progression used.

I am thinking of which 3-stepper to use.

For me, a 4-stepper is a no-go.

I will let you know as I do more testing -- and tinkering.

[cht]

Andre,
I have said this before -- don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the naysayers are saying.

Just do your stuff -- as long as it wins, that's all that matters.

Regarding your method, I think it might be even more loss-resistant than JL's original PB.

My test confirms that to be true.

I have started paper testing it with my collection of real dealer-spun and airball spins.

I will have a better idea of how this method fares in another 2-4 weeks.

As of now, my main issue has to do with the progression used.

I am thinking of which 3-stepper to use.

For me, a 4-stepper is a no-go.

Try 1/1 or 1/2.

I will let you know as I do more testing -- and tinkering.

[Joe]

I have said this before -- don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the naysayers are saying.

Just do your stuff -- as long as it wins, that's all that matters.

And I will say this : Don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the Yaysayers are saying. 

Just do your stuff -- as long as it loses, that's all that matters. 

I'm not accusing anyone of lying, but If some people say it wins and some say it loses, then clearly it isn't the consistent winner claimed by JL.

It doesn't make sense to say that a system works for some but not others. If a system works then it should work for everyone. If it works, then it works, period.

But whatever floats your boat I guess.

[cht]

The one thing I see that could kill that is that just like when youre tracking you get a lot of repeating patterns, you might face one or more of those patterns hitting beteeen the 7th and the 8th. If JL's original has some value is right down to those repeating patterns. By betting just against the last pattern, youre in fact begging for those repeaters to hit, and since they will be equal to the patterns that already hit, and different from the 8th, the best possible result is a win.

For JL PB played on baccarat, don't bet against the 8th pattern when -

1. Say the 8th pattern is BBP. earlier there is a repeat series of BPP where 2 out of three is the same as the 8th pattern 1st B and 3rd P,  don't bet this session.

2. This earlier repeat series is not BBB or PPP.

My test shows 40% signals playable with a 13:1 win/loss ratio.

I don't know if it works for roulette.

[DoctorSudoku]

And I will say this : Don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the Yaysayers are saying. 

Just do your stuff -- as long as it loses, that's all that matters. 

I'm not accusing anyone of lying, but If some people say it wins and some say it loses, then clearly it isn't the consistent winner claimed by JL.

It doesn't make sense to say that a system works for some but not others. If a system works then it should work for everyone. If it works, then it works, period.

But whatever floats your boat I guess.

I have been playing PB (with my own set of tweaks) since September, 2015.

My bank roll has grown consistently since that time (PB is one of about six rare pattern-based methods that I play regularly and they have all contributed to that).

And my bank roll keeps growing.

That is what floats my boat.

[DoctorSudoku]

For JL PB played on baccarat, don't bet against the 8th pattern when -

1. Say the 8th pattern is BBP. earlier there is a repeat series of BPP where 2 out of three is the same as the 8th pattern 1st B and 3rd P,  don't bet this session.

2. This earlier repeat series is not BBB or PPP.

My test shows 40% signals playable with a 13:1 win/loss ratio.

I don't know if it works for roulette.

PB and other similar EC betting methods should, for obvious reasons, work better at baccarat than at roulette.

Though, I have to admit that for my 1 2 betting progression that I implemented about six months ago, my strike rate is currently higher for roulette than it is for baccarat.

[Winner]

I have no reason to lie. Im part of this forum to help and get help. I have better things to do in life than to come here in this forum to deceive others. I'm not a sick crazy guy trying  misleading people.
My goal is make money playing.

I play with my rules.
I've never seen the two patterns forming for four times and this factor makes me win.

But I don't care anymore what others think about me and my way of playing.

As a tv series always said: Believe it or not!

It's not about deception it's about understanding why no one is duplicating the results it's just strange ..

[Winner]

Good for you. You can now go and play the repeaters method to your heart's content where you will almost always win, according to a certain roulette genius.      

Are you talking about Turbo the genius

[Winner]

PB and other similar EC betting methods should, for obvious reasons, work better at baccarat than at roulette.

Though, I have to admit that for my 1 2 betting progression that I implemented about six months ago, my strike rate is currently higher for roulette than it is for baccarat.

Good on you keep winning better in your pocket then there's
Does not answer the question on why others are not duplicating the results.

[RouletteGhost]

And my bank roll keeps growing.

That is what floats my boat.

That’s all that matters. What coderjoe is saying doesn’t matter

I know several playing PB successfully

No one claims it does not lose

However the Dr. approach of only a 1 2 punch prevents deep progression losses

If the wins outweigh the losses that come that’s all not matters. Not some 1 million spin test. Let’s enter reality here. A real person will limit their losses, a stop loss, and take their winnings and run. Not behave like a hundred thousand spin bot