*PATTERN BREAKER*

[praline]

...hey guys. ..


Guess what!?
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M





Roulette is Unbeatable! !!!!!!!
?

[Andre Chass]

So you doubt?

See the image

BPP BPP BPP BPB

100 bucks more in my wallet

[Andre Chass]

Andre,
I have said this before -- don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the naysayers are saying.

Just do your stuff -- as long as it wins, that's all that matters.

Regarding your method, I think it might be even more loss-resistant than JL's original PB.

I have started paper testing it with my collection of real dealer-spun and airball spins.

I will have a better idea of how this method fares in another 2-4 weeks.

As of now, my main issue has to do with the progression used.

I am thinking of which 3-stepper to use.

For me, a 4-stepper is a no-go.

I will let you know as I do more testing -- and tinkering.

Thanks for the support, Doctor!

Rarely I go to 4 step progression.

I will wait for your tests results.

Cheers

[DoctorSudoku]

Good on you keep winning better in your pocket then there's
Does not answer the question on why others are not duplicating the results.

If PB does not work for you, then don't play it.

No need to despair, though: there is always the repeaters method that supposedly almost always wins, as claimed by that officially certified roulette genius.

PB has been working for me (again, with my set of tweaks) since September, 2015.

It is one of about six rare pattern-based methods that have been working for me (for the most part, quite consistently so far).

If they stop working, I will stop playing them -- it is that simple.

But as long as they work, I will keep using them to increase my bank roll.

It would be idiotic for me to listen to all the naysayers on this forum and stop using these methods (as long as they are working)  just so that they can be happy.

[Ricky]

So you doubt?

See the image

BPP BPP BPP BPB

100 bucks more in my wallet

And waiting for 7 patterns works. Another 15 euro in my wallet

[Ricky]

I must admit I hate watching this pattern go by 

[cht]

Andre,
I have said this before -- don't get too emotionally embroiled with what the naysayers are saying.

Just do your stuff -- as long as it wins, that's all that matters.

Regarding your method, I think it might be even more loss-resistant than JL's original PB.

I have started paper testing it with my collection of real dealer-spun and airball spins.

I will have a better idea of how this method fares in another 2-4 weeks.

As of now, my main issue has to do with the progression used.

I am thinking of which 3-stepper to use.

For me, a 4-stepper is a no-go.

I will let you know as I do more testing -- and tinkering.

The signals come at an average rate of 3 in every 20 shoes or 15 in every 100 shoes.

The 4 step loss hits 1-2 in every 100 shoes or 7000 hands.

Needless to say the 2 and 3 step loss hit at a higher rate.

It's not possible to play this at the manual tables b&m casinos due to the very slow rate the signals come in with 11/2 hrs per shoe and a large number of shoes do not complete.

[Winner]

If PB does not work for you, then don't play it.

No need to despair, though: there is always the repeaters method that supposedly almost always wins, as claimed by that officially certified roulette genius.

PB has been working for me (again, with my set of tweaks) since September, 2015.

It is one of about six rare pattern-based methods that have been working for me (for the most part, quite consistently so far).

If they stop working, I will stop playing them -- it is that simple.

But as long as they work, I will keep using them to increase my bank roll.

It would be idiotic for me to listen to all the naysayers on this forum and stop using these methods (as long as they are working)  just so that they can be happy.

Then don't play it :
I stopped playing it in 08 I was happy to leave with my underware on .
Dam brings back bad memory.

[DoctorSudoku]

Then don't play it :

I stopped playing it in 08 I was happy to leave with my underware on .

Dam brings back bad memory.

Then take it one step further:

Don't visit or post on this particular PB-related thread -- no use either dredging up bad memories or again facing the prospect of losing your underwear.

[Ricky]

I know PATIENCE is the key but while waiting for the Baccarat Pattern to appear I decided to play small 1 euro base bets on the following forming pattern.
Used the FORMULA progression by Jay Silva and his tendency method to follow the dominant side of last six hands. Rode Player for 40 euro profit. Climbed the Ladder twice. Shoe was showing 37-10 in favor of player before I stopped. So as long as you get a good run like below on player or banker the FORMULA can yield some decent profit with minimal risk.

[Roulettebeater]

...hey guys. ..


Guess what!?
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M





Roulette is Unbeatable! !!!!!!!
?

please elaborate more, we are not super-smart to understand what you mean with M.

cheers

[Steve]

No amount of patience makes a losing system a winning system. Just do ample testing without real money. You risk nothing and can test a system over millions of spins in minutes. Use software like rx.

[Roulettebeater]

yea, yea!

Gambler's fallacy at its best!

[Roulettebeater]

What the guys are doing here (according to this pattern breaker system) is chasing the wheel to reproduce a specified pattern.

I have tested this approach on roulette and the wheel reproduced the pattern!

[Andre Chass]

While you're talking math bullshit I'm making money, drinking beers, partying girl, girls, girls and getting rich ... lol.

See y'all in f*** Vegas... Hahaha

Sorry guys, I can't write while there are two girls on me...