*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Roulettebeater]

While you're talking math bullshit I'm making money, drinking beers, partying girl, girls, girls and getting rich ... lol.

See y'all in f*** Vegas... Hahaha

The story is awesome but it has not yet arrived at its expected end

I can be rich too as you claim by playing "whatever system with waiting" not necessarily this pattern breaker.

I can make same money as you say by putting 100 euro on half wheel (18 numbers) after waiting 2 hours for the correct moment and chasing my loss three times

:-)

[Andre Chass]

The story is awesome but it has not yet arrived at its expected end

I can be rich too as you claim by playing "whatever system with waiting" not necessarily this pattern breaker.

I can make same money as you say by putting 100 euro on half wheel (18 numbers) after waiting 2 hours for the correct moment and chasing my loss three times

:-)

Hey up man!

Did you already find tables 20 cents to bet?

[Ricky]

I can make same money as you say by putting 100 euro on half wheel (18 numbers) after waiting 2 hours for the correct moment and chasing my loss three times

Hi Roulettebeater,
You are absolutely right. You will probably end up ahead over 100 games playing 10 times a day. The point is the Waiting is the key to success. The method is not the holy grail of success. No one on this forum ever said the PB method would never lose. What is being claimed is that of all the methods tried in a hit and run mode of play the method of PB (the original) played on a game like roulette or even Baccarat has a better chance of consistently winning > 7/1 over 100 games and back to back losses are not very common from the experience of those testing and playing it over a considerable amount of time.

If you had enough patience playing half the wheel with this same discipline I am sure you will experience similar results over 100 games. The only difference between this method and PB is that you are "guessing" which side of the wheel you are going to bet. You have no consistent method to identify which side. With PB we are letting the wheel decide for us which side we should bet. We are in fact challenging the wheel to spin the right side while we just follow the rules. And if we cover the Zero bet random has nowhere to hide but to select the correct side of the E/C bet to beat us.

Its having the patience to sit it out while random does its thing that is the key to the success of any method that has strict rules which give random a challenge to "consistently" perform when its required.

Cheers,
Ricky

[Winner]

Then take it one step further:

Don't visit or post on this particular PB-related thread -- no use either dredging up bad memories or again facing the prospect of losing your underwear.
[/quote
But I'm happy visiting  I have superman underwear know.

[sentinel3]

Then take it one step further:

Don't visit or post on this particular PB-related thread -- no use either dredging up bad memories or again facing the prospect of losing your underwear.

Doctor some of these jokers will play 20 games lose 4 or 5 times. And then dismiss the system as no good.

Thats fine. Not everybody has the RIGHT mindset to win at this game. Its natural selection doing its thing. My only question is how he STOPPED playing PB in 2008..I didnt publish it to anyone until APRIL 2011.

Someones not being honest here...

[Winner]

Doctor some of these jokers will play 20 games lose 4 or 5 times. And then dismiss the system as no good.

Thats fine. Not everybody has the RIGHT mindset to win at this game. Its natural selection doing its thing. My only question is how he STOPPED playing PB in 2008..I didnt publish it to anyone until APRIL 2011.

Someones not being honest here...

sorry that was a typo I was playing this way before o8 I don't think your the originator of  this type of betting .  What ever happen to the the Zone back then . That was the first system I played way before you even posted it .
I'm being very truthful here  this type of betting will never work not now and not 200 years from now . Gizmo tested this way back over 100,000 spins  it did not WIN .
Anyways fun playing I hope you make a million  and I'm being truth full there  .good bye

[Roulettebeater]

Guys,

why you like to talk too much!
actually it's very easy to find out if this system wins over the long term.
I will generate 25 millions random sets (B, P) and then you can find out if your pattern will repeat.

ok?

[RouletteGhost]

I will generate 25 millions random sets (B, P) and then you can find out if your pattern will repeat.

ok?

Such an honest representation of real world play

Thanks!

I’ve always thought to myself : ya know this strategy wins more than it loses but somewhere in 25 million spins it loses big so I should stop increasing my bankroll.

[Roulettebeater]

Such an honest representation of real world play

Thanks!

I’ve always thought to myself : ya know this strategy wins more than it loses but somewhere in 25 million spins it loses big so I should stop increasing my bankroll.

or you need 25 mio random sets for three outcomes (P,B,T)?

[RouletteGhost]

[Andre Chass]

The signals come at an average rate of 3 in every 20 shoes or 15 in every 100 shoes.

The 4 step loss hits 1-2 in every 100 shoes or 7000 hands.

So the strategy is a winner!
I rarely go to the 4 step progression.

It's not possible to play this at the manual tables b&m casinos due to the very slow rate the signals come in with 11/2 hrs per shoe and a large number of shoes do not complete.

How about betting a single high value bet once a day?
We can betting low value bets until the pattern (trigger) is formed.

The strategy is not for players who dont have enough time, don't have a large bankroll and dont have the patience of a hunter waiting for the prey.

[Andre Chass]

And nobody ever said the strategy would never lose...

Cheers

[cht]

The strategy is not for players who dont have enough time, don't have a large bankroll and dont have the patience of a hunter waiting for the prey.

I gave the statistical expectation when you play your method.

I agree with DrSudoku your variant is more loss resistant than the revised JL PB.

My test showed that 1/1 or 1/2 is the more optimal bet compared with 1/1/3/6.

Besides the attributes you mention to play your method, the geographical layout of the tables and players population play an important part. You also have to be physically strong to play it continuously over few days.

[lottojack]

If you are into big numbers consider the following:

There are 36! / (18! * 18! * 2) or  4,537,567,650 ways to group 36 numbers into 2 groups of 18 numbers.  E/O, H/L are just two easy groupings out of the 4,537,567,650 groupings that our brain can quickly process.  With today's affordable computing power (8 or 16 cores) it would not take much effort to figure out based on currently tracked spins which grouping can qualify in the least number of spins or which grouping is out the longest number of spins.

This would only be useful if for some reason a grouping that qualified 7 of the 8 sub-patterns in 21 spins (ignoring any 0's) is more powerful than a grouping that qualified 7 of the 8 sub-patterns in say 27 spins.

I actually think a grouping that is longest out is probably a more interesting play.

Cheers

[sentinel3]

sorry that was a typo I was playing this way before o8 I don't think your the originator of  this type of betting .  What ever happen to the the Zone back then . That was the first system I played way before you even posted it .
I'm being very truthful here  this type of betting will never work not now and not 200 years from now . Gizmo tested this way back over 100,000 spins  it did not WIN .
Anyways fun playing I hope you make a million  and I'm being truth full there  .good bye

Will never win? Mmm so ive been lying for 11 years and Dr Sodoku for 2.5 years. And several people I know who pay their bills with PB.

No it will never work with a defeatest cant be bothered attitude. But you play EXACTLY as I do and then tell me you cant win. Because I have no time for people who play a couple of hundred games and think they know it all. Try 15,000. Then you will know BETTER.

P.S and please do show me where someone published The EXACT RULES of PATTERN BREAKER Before me. This will be fun.