• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*PATTERN BREAKER*

Started by Johnlegend, Apr 08, 05:46 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 162 Guests are viewing this topic.

DoctorSudoku

Quote from: Andre Chass on Mar 27, 12:36 PM 2018
Despite all the doubts about sentinel3, we can not forget that Pattern Breaker strategy works and there are a lot of players that use it including DOCTORSUDOKU.

Let's give sentinel3 the benefit of the doubt.



Andre,
As long as PB works for me, I will keep playing it -- to make profits.

If it stops working, I will stop playing it.

It is as simple as that.

Repeat: The only reason I play this game is to make profits.

I do NOT play this game or other casino games just for fun.
What is the fastest way of destroying your bankroll at the casino?

Play roulette with GLC's progressions.

Andre Chass

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Mar 27, 12:59 PM 2018


Andre,
As long as PB works for me, I will keep playing it -- to make profits.

If it stops working, I will stop playing it.

It is as simple as that.

Repeat: The only reason I play this game is to make profits.

I do NOT play this game or other casino games just for fun.

That's what matters, Doc.

I just sent a pm to sentinel3 asking him to appears.
He  was an inspiration for me to be able to develop my own PB version.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Lucky7Red

Quote from: Andre Chass on Mar 27, 03:30 PM 2018
That's what matters, Doc.

I just sent a pm to sentinel3 asking him to appears.
He  was an inspiration for me to be able to develop my own PB version.

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything.
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?

RouletteGhost

Sentinel isn’t lying

I know people playing this

The results are the same across the board. 8 to 10 wins per 1 loss.

That being said, if you do not like the method, leave the thread. It’s that simple for forum peace.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

If you don’t agree with the method please refrain from attacking people and move on to another thread. Let those playing it share results peacefully. Please stop

Thank you.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

Quote from: cht on Mar 27, 12:50 PM 2018
There are winners and losers. A year from now we have new group of winners and losers. Winning systems have their fair share of losers, losing systems have their fair share of winners. The long term consistent sure winner in the billions is the casino. And the scammers and marketers. :xd: :xd: :xd:

There are winners, and losers. Slightly more losers - that's the house edge. Most of the basics everyone is forgetting are explained at link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

sentinel3

Quote from: Roulettebeater on Mar 27, 04:26 AM 2018
Something is mysterious here :

Sentinel "the god of pattern breaker"  has said that he doesn't hold more than 200-300$ in one account, at the same time you repeatedly saying that this strategy requires betting high to be successful.

How on earth can that be understood ? If "the god of pattern breaker" has only 200 in his account and need to do 4 steps martingale, what stakes is he using ????
Roulettebeater,

I think you misunderstood. I dont go over â,¬350 in any one account But I have 11 accounts. The reason being if any of them become sore losers and freeze my account in the future. I should have won and WITHDRAWN SEVERAL times the amount THEY STEAL.

sentinel3

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Mar 27, 02:32 AM 2018

At that time, JL was posting under that new name, Sentinel. And he did NOT want to admit that he was actually JL.

It was only a month later (toward the end of January or thereabouts) that he decided to admit that Sentinel and JL were indeed the same person.

As for praising himself, you can, understandably, criticize him for that (though, again, remember that at the time of those posts, he had not yet made his admission of being the same person).
That is correct Dr...

sentinel3

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Mar 27, 04:46 PM 2018
Sentinel isn’t lying

I know people playing this

The results are the same across the board. 8 to 10 wins per 1 loss.

That being said, if you do not like the method, leave the thread. It’s that simple for forum peace.
That is correct RG. Everyone has a choice. Its natural selection. A 1000 people will look at PB. In the end only a few will STICK TO IT.

And any who do will be rewarded LONG TERM. Not in 5 minutes. This is no get rich scheme. Its one of the best grinders ever. But it asks for a quality FEW possess. PATIENCE...

sentinel3

Quote from: Winner on Mar 26, 11:25 PM 2018
There's no tripping I make sure that my laces are tide .
Because it wasn't published doesn't mean that it was not tested .
Give one reason you think the 8 pattern is as great as you say it is .
Because you wait doesn't mean a thing it eventually tanks  .Im a realist .
Well its taking its time to tank winner. Its IMPOSSIBLE to go backwards when you have been going forwards for 11 years.

Its a rock steady grinder. Not a get rich scheme. Each 100 GAMES delivers a win loss split of 89--11 to 94--6.

Thats the range. Theres never been a 100 game set thats shown me negative numbers. And even if there were one in three that did. The system would STILL be an overall winner. Gizmo proved that PB couldnt stand up played CONTINUOUSLY. He didnt prove the system fails played SELECTIVLEY. Which is how its played in THE REAL WORLD.

Know the difference. People have yet to understand no simulator can truly replicate real world results..And thats why they remain so negative and dismissive of someone like me.

Had you been on the journey with me since the beginning. You would have no dount this system is one of the best grinders of alltime period. It has delivered to me 12 to 52 units profit per 100 games over 150 times over the years.

It is as solid as granite. As ive said a million times it asks one thing of the player. Sadly the thing that over 90% of humans lack. PATIENCE...

Proofreaders2000

I have a PM from JohnLegend dated March 15,2011

"Proof I remember you asking me for something a bit special for even chances. I have a METHOD called PATTERN BREAKER which I used with good success a few years back. I think you will like the thinking behind it. I am out to eat then will PM it to you Later. If you like it I will Debut it on the forum in a couple of weeks. Dont want to overcrowd it Lol!!!!!!!" ;D ;D ;D

mohitomish

Still waiting for your multiple withdrawals screenshots. @Sentinel

Ted009

Sentinel is not selling anything here and he is helping other fellow players to follow his style of play. He is under no obligation to prove to anyone and it is anyone's discretion whether or not to believe his style of play. I never read anywhere that Sentinel is forcing anyone to follow him and that he asks anyone for ANYTHING.
Please refrain your negativity toward Sentinel's good heart.

If we all promote love instead of hate, this world would be a much better place to be in...

Good luck to everyone....

RouletteGhost

Sentinel just ignore the idiots. Please.

Guys keep going with the results
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Andre Chass

Welcome back sentinel3!

I invite all the idiots who dont like the method to get out of the thread.

Sentinel3 has no obligation to prove anything.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

-