*PATTERN BREAKER*

[sentinel3]

Welcome back sentinel3!

I invite all the idiots who dont like the method to get out of the thread.

Sentinel3 has no obligation to prove anything.

Hi Andre

Yes its THEIR CHOICE. No one is pushing anyone to do anything. If you dont have the patience to play this game properly. Then its not for you.

The people who have what it takes. Will come to see its benefits over time. Thats all there is to it.

If its not for you move on...

[moles40]

Playing even chance on roulette,still just under 50% chance of winning,however long you wait,or don’t wait for something to happen

[RouletteGhost]

I like this for "stadium baccarat"

at my local casino we have the electronic baccarat....where the robot arm deals real cards

it is good because you can sit without betting, and only bet when you feel like it

the history board goes far back so you can get a bet right away essentially

almost no wait, after your bet can switch to another stadium baccarat game to get another bet

[Andre Chass]

I like this for "stadium baccarat"

at my local casino we have the electronic baccarat....where the robot arm deals real cards

it is good because you can sit without betting, and only bet when you feel like it

the history board goes far back so you can get a bet right away essentially

almost no wait, after your bet can switch to another stadium baccarat game to get another bet

RG

Which casino do you play? Which city?

Are the electronics tables individual or collective?
If you do not bet you can stay at the table or they ask you to leave? Can I wait for the "trigger" with no problems?
What are the maximum and minimum bets? I mean chips values.

Are you playing only the original PB or also "my way"?

Sorry about to much questions. I've never had that experience.

[RouletteGhost]

RG

Which casino do you play? Which city?

Are the electronics tables individual or collective?
If you do not bet you can stay at the table or they ask you to leave? Can I wait for the "trigger" with no problems?
What are the maximum and minimum bets? I mean chips values.

Are you playing only the original PB or also "my way"?

Sorry about to much questions. I've never had that experience.

Resorts world casino. Queens NY. No live dealers. Only electronic

The baccarat is real cards dealt by a robotic arm

I haven’t played anything yet. I was going to attempt pattern breaker

What is your way?

There many many different terminals with plenty of seating and you can sit without betting. No dealers. No pit bosses

[DoctorSudoku]

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything.

How come you don't post that warning (actually it is Steve's warning at the top of the home page) on other threads?

[DoctorSudoku]

Resorts world casino. Queens NY. No live dealers. Only electronic

The baccarat is real cards dealt by a robotic arm

I haven’t played anything yet. I was going to attempt pattern breaker

What is your way?

There many many different terminals with plenty of seating and you can sit without betting. No dealers. No pit bosses

Stadium versions of the various games are the dream playing scenarios for me.

From what I understand (from reading and watching videos about them) , you can literally sit there for hours on end tracking as much as you like and betting and sitting on the sidelines, again,  as much as you like, without anyone bothering you.

The problem is that you can hardly find them anywhere else in the US.

I personally have never come across them in the dozen or so casinos that I have visited in the last few years.

The closest thing to the stadium games are the air ball roulette wheels that you find in some casinos.

And, nowadays, air ball wheels are my preferred mode of playing roulette (as compared to dealer-spun wheels at the regular tables).

[Lucky7Red]

How come you don't post that warning (actually it is Steve's warning at the top of the home page) on other threads?

Because it is John Legends biggest scam of all times during several years.

[DoctorSudoku]

Because it is John Legends biggest scam of all times during several years.

If you apply similar criteria to evaluating  all of the other methods discussed (by others) in this forum, most of them have to be categorized similarly (since, for different reasons, not everyone can replicate the same positive results that some individuals get).

[Ricky]

RG

Which casino do you play? Which city?

Are the electronics tables individual or collective?
If you do not bet you can stay at the table or they ask you to leave? Can I wait for the "trigger" with no problems?
What are the maximum and minimum bets? I mean chips values.

Are you playing only the original PB or also "my way"?

Sorry about to much questions. I've never had that experience.

Hi Andre,
link:s://:.crownmelbourne.com.au/casino/casino-games/semi-automated-table-games

This casino has Roulette, Baccarat (3 tables live dealer but shuffled using a ShuffleMaster, no CSM, plays through complete 6 deck shoe), BlackJack(CSM machine) and SicBo all live dealer and electronic tables with games played every 30 seconds or so with timer for betting on electronic machines. Plenty of tables to choose from and you can sit there all day no questions asked. I think I will be settling to your method of Play BPP BPP BP and PBB PBB PB and then betting big 30-30-90 until bankroll grows. I have a 1,000 bankroll and hoping to grow it using this method alone. I have not had a real loss yet although had losses with tie which I had to stop betting. I am considering covering tie bet on step 2-3 with 30-25,5,82-8 as long as I continue not to experience any real losses.
In my analysis of other rare patterns I have come across the attached pattern PBBB PBBB PBBB which I have not seen repeating 4 times. Have you seen this pattern repeat more than three? If not then do you think we could bet same 30-30-90 on BPP for it not to repeat a fourth time? The same would go for BPPP BPPP BPPP which you would bet PBB.

Regards,
Ricky

[DoctorSudoku]

Hi Andre,
link:s://:.crownmelbourne.com.au/casino/casino-games/semi-automated-table-games

This casino has Roulette, Baccarat (3 tables live dealer but shuffled using a ShuffleMaster, no CSM, plays through complete 6 deck shoe), BlackJack(CSM machine) and SicBo all live dealer and electronic tables with games played every 30 seconds or so with timer for betting on electronic machines. Plenty of tables to choose from and you can sit there all day no questions asked. I think I will be settling to your method of Play BPP BPP BP and PBB PBB PB and then betting big 30-30-90 until bankroll grows. I have a 1,000 bankroll and hoping to grow it using this method alone.

I have not had a real loss yet although had losses with tie which I had to stop betting. I am considering covering tie bet on step 2-3 with 30-25,5,82-8 as long as I continue not to experience any real losses.

In my analysis of other rare patterns I have come across the attached pattern PBBB PBBB PBBB which I have not seen repeating 4 times. Have you seen this pattern repeat more than three? If not then do you think we could bet same 30-30-90 on BPP for it not to repeat a fourth time? The same would go for BPPP BPPP BPPP which you would bet PBB.

Regards,
Ricky

Ricky,
What do you mean you had a loss with a tie?

In baccarat, if you have a bet on Banker or Player, and a tie shows up, your bet is returned to you without any reduction in the amount of your bet.

So, strictly speaking, in terms of your Banker or Player bet, it is almost like nothing happened.

So why are you suffering a loss in that scenario?

[Ricky]

Ricky,
What do you mean you had a loss with a tie?

In baccarat, if you have a bet on Banker or Player, and a tie shows up, your bet is returned to you without any reduction in the amount of your bet.

So, strictly speaking, in terms of your Banker or Player bet, it is almost like nothing happened.

So why are you suffering a loss in that scenario?

Hi DR
Tie on second step so LOSS-TIE for -30-0 = -30. Technically not a loss of the 3 step but when you get a tie it  breaks the pattern but you have not choice but to abandon the betting progression I will recoup that loss in next  game. So my idea is if I get to 2nd or 3rd step I will start covering the tie bet with 25,5 and 82,8 respectively to recoup loss of  previous step(s) and sacrifice some profit. Risk will be the same.

Cheers,
Ricky

[Ricky]

Hi DR
Tie on second step so LOSS-TIE for -30-0 = -30. Technically not a loss of the 3 step but when you get a tie it  breaks the pattern but you have not choice but to abandon the betting progression I will recoup that loss in next  game. So my idea is if I get to 2nd or 3rd step I will start covering the tie bet with 25,5 and 82,8 respectively to recoup loss of  previous step(s) and sacrifice some profit. Risk will be the same.

Cheers,
Ricky

Hi Andre,
while typing this last post I just cam across another example of the pattern I mentioned above


Could this be another betting opportunity?
Cheers,
Ricky

[Ricky]

Its a rock steady grinder. Not a get rich scheme. Each 100 GAMES delivers a win loss split of 89--11 to 94--6.

Thats the range. Theres never been a 100 game set thats shown me negative numbers. And even if there were one in three that did. The system would STILL be an overall winner. Gizmo proved that PB couldnt stand up played CONTINUOUSLY. He didnt prove the system fails played SELECTIVLEY. Which is how its played in THE REAL WORLD.

Hi Sentinel,
My latest testing in continuous play confirms Gizmo's finding in that you cannot get the same win rate playing game after game without avoiding the inevitable loss. So hit and run allows you to be more selective in playing PB.

BUT what I am noticing is that I rarely get two losses in a row playing continuously and occasionally I get a winning streak of 6 or more before the next loss.
So to improve my performance I have incorporated a Recovery mode. I am playing 0-1-2 now with a FOR/AGAINST based on the first spin result. This has improved performance in continuous mode and speeds recovery with lower risk.

So now I am adjusting my BOT to see if I can simulate hit and run while playing continuously. I am hoping this will resolve the last hurdle we have in playing PB continuously.

NEW RULES: (in beta)
1. Play continuously until you encounter a loss.

2. Record the winning streak before the loss.

3. Now play your two recovery rounds and then continue playing until you have played the same number of games as your last winning streak.

4. Now start VIRTUAL BETTING until you encounter another VIRTUAL LOSS.

5. Once a Virtual Loss is encountered resume betting up to the number of games of your last winning streak.

6. If you reach the number of winning games without a loss for 2 times after initial recording then continue betting until your next real loss. This will allow you to record a longer winning streak.

7. If at any time you experience a loss before reaching your current winning streak then use this reduced winning streak for future sessions and repeat the above process.

This NEW RULE should in theory improve the win rate of playing PB continuously and avoid running into real losses. It will hopefully simulate a hit and run scenario playing continuously in a BOT which has all the PATIENCE and DISCIPLINE in the world.

Feel free to use your models to test this theory out. I am in the process of updating my BOT to use the above rules and see if I can improve real play the PB method over 100 games playing continuously but selectively

cheers,
Ricky

[Gerard711]

I like this for "stadium baccarat"

at my local casino we have the electronic baccarat....where the robot arm deals real cards

it is good because you can sit without betting, and only bet when you feel like it

the history board goes far back so you can get a bet right away essentially

almost no wait, after your bet can switch to another stadium baccarat game to get another bet

The only thing with the history board there's no indication of when the last shoe ended or this one has begun and personally I don't trust them I know it's real cards being dealt but I've seen things happen that it's incredible Resorts World is a Singapore company I don't trust them