*PATTERN BREAKER*

[mr.ore]

How are you testing so quick mr.ore.Still waiting your answer.

And

I click to konsole, press arrow up and enter to invoke last command:

make && GSL_RNG_TYPE=ranlux389 ./system4 65536 > /tmp/data.dat

then switch to gnuplot and click refresh, it reads /tmp/data.dat and draw a graph

and then snapshot it with ksnapshot

I code it directly in C++, it is the fastest way of testing. This method has a source about 200 lines long. Well over time I made a set of functions to support roulette coding and testing and now if I want to test a system, I just copy-paste source code of older one and make some changes to it.

[mr.ore]

And now biggest joke of day comes, I just found this in my code settings for simulator:

bool noZero = true;
//bool noZero = false;


All previous simulations are invalid, lol 

[mr.ore]

64k spins from wiesbaden, this time with zero enabled and working.

[mr.ore]

Another mistake found - in breadwinner after a loss,  I did not reset counter of wins in a row to zero, so it was not so aggressive as breadwinner can be, after "repeair" it is even worse.I hope it is right now.

[mr.ore]

Tracker is in download section.

[GLC]

Another mistake found - in breadwinner after a loss,  I did not reset counter of wins in a row to zero, so it was not so aggressive as breadwinner can be, after "repeair" it is even worse.I hope it is right now.

Sorry to see these latest results Mr. Ore.  Thanks for staying with it until you got it right.

This system isn't my cup of tea.  See you on the next one.

Geo

[seykid31]

I also,is not really for me even if i was playing european wheel,and even if it is producing good results for some.I dont quite get it how puttting groups of 3 have any effect,but like it is said random to beat random.But like the saying goes,for those playing it,why kick it if it is working

[Johnlegend]

64k spins from wiesbaden, this time with zero enabled and working.

These graphs dont tell me anything. I deal with roulette in THE REAL WORLD. If I ask you to give me the only information that is of any value concerning PATTERN BREAKER you will fail to do so.

1, How many wins for HIGH LOW *ONLY*. When I endorse any method its on the basis of HOW I PLAYED IT. Nothing else.

2, Longest winning streaks for HIGH LOW ONLY?

3, Double losses for HIGH LOW ONLY.

4, Losses that OCCURRED IN A GAME THAT TOOK MORE THAN 45 spins to reach conclusion. Very important as almost all loses occur in long 45 plus spin games.

You can put a method into a simulator, it simply cannot mimick the play method and decision making of a human player. If for example you have no winning streaks in your mountain range in excess of forty its completely null and void. I have 36 streaks of 40 or more games consecutively won from my recorded 2,500 plus records.

And the POWER of the method remains impressive winning streaks and quick recovery, once you have won 50 or more units profit. You can recover a loss very quickly. Without risking any of your original BR. I will post the numbers for 2,565 REAL GAMES played later. With the data that matters. 

[Mike]

You can put a method into a simulator, it simply cannot mimick the play method and decision making of a human player.  If for example you have no winning streaks in your mountain range in excess of forty its completely null and void.  I have 36 streaks of 40 or more games consecutively won from my recorded 2,500 plus records.

The system is simple enough to understand, but when someone dares to show that it loses you then introduce new rules which weren't present in the original.  A computer program can be written to mimic any human actions and decisions, so why didn't you give us the full rules in the first place?

[ROB22]

The system is simple enough to understand, but when someone dares to show that it loses you then introduce new rules which weren't present in the original.  A computer program can be written to mimic any human actions and decisions, so why didn't you give us the full rules in the first place?

I just wanted to show  the negative  people on here my results.

live wheel  and 12 wins in a row  +24   went to 3rd step twice.

Before people say it does not work they must play lots of games to see the true results

for themselfs.

Mike you say johnlegend changed the rules but he as not .

He is only breaking it down into important parts of the game which changes the outcome.

I will keep everyone updated on how I go this week.

[chrisbis]

How long did it take U to get those 12 wins Rob22?

[ROB22]

average spins 35 to 60

a break of at least half an hour between sessions.

using real human spins latvian girls 12 wins in row.

staying away from slingshot live because of the bad result

2 losses in 6 games

[Mike]

I just wanted to show  the negative  people on here my results.

Can we stop the labelling of people as "negative"? it achieves nothing and just encourages bickering.  The perfectly reasonable question is this: why is mr. ore's simulation invalid if he used all the rules correctly?

@ ROB22, 12 sessions doesn't really prove anything.

[jon86]

Real world and real roulette .

Does 57 sessions prove more than Robs 12 sessions ? + todays session 3. 33 sessions is in a row without loss.

Had losings sessions but recovered with 7.14.28 progression in the next games!

Now I will play the rest of my session for the morning  

Jon

[chrisbis]

Nice work jon86  

And U too Rob22.

I would like for someone to post up an actual game session for us all to see.

And who ever can do that, would they use my Reveal feature, to keep the thread nice and tidy.

Its the window sign just above the smileys, two back from the Pi symbol.
[reveal][attachimg=#][/reveal]

Just put any info/data/table/list inside the square brackets,
(where the cursor ends up after U click the 'window', in making a reply or Private Message)
and its nice and easy for all members to access.

Cheers