*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Johnlegend]

The system is simple enough to understand, but when someone dares to show that it loses you then introduce new rules which weren't present in the original.  A computer program can be written to mimic any human actions and decisions, so why didn't you give us the full rules in the first place?

The rules are on page one. the way its been tested is flawed FULL STOP. The name of the game is PROFIT TO LOSS., Simply betting the same 2,4,8 progression on a continuos 64k sample does NOT give a true mirror of the P&L
that will be achieved by someone RESPONDING to their results. Until you take this onboard you're not on the right wavelength.

I play *5* games a day on average. Smart money management. takes this method to another level. I haven't gone into all the aspects that make this method a gem. As I wanted people to fully grasp the fundamentals first. Its never been pushed as invincible. We have MV5 pushing us closer to those borders.

Its value comes from the relatively small buy in of *14* units. And its ability to produce impressive winning streaks that when matched with smart money management can take that streak up quickly. EXAMPLE of a 20 game winning streak.

14+2=16
16+2=18
18+2=20
20+2=22
22+2=24--ADD 4 up to level 2
28+4=32
32+4=36
36+4=40
40+4=44
44+4=48--ADD 8 up to level 3
56+8=64
64+8=72
72+8=80
80+8=88
88+8=96--ADD 16 up to level 4
112+16=128
128+16=144
144+16=160
160+16=176
176+16=192

Total investment over the twenty game streak 42 units. Total profit 150 units. This is an example of what's possible in a short time frame with this method. I have done this over a four day period. many many times.

What I recommend is you stay with the basic staking UNTIL you have won 100 units. Then you can be more experimental when you are risking your PROFITS. I have a winning streak of 112 in my records the longest of them all.
And streaks in excess of 20 are common. If you understand how to exploit this raising and lowering your progressions. You will realize some very satisfying profits.

Another fine tuning element that can be used to create long winning streaks is SELECTIVE BETTING. By this I mean if for example you lack the patience to wait four days to win 150 units. And want to play more games in a day. What I know from my experience with this game is virtually ALL loses occur the wrong side of 45 spins. Taking the Zero out of the equation. If random has taken its time to arrive at the FINAL PATTERN, by multi-repeating on other patterns. This is when it often matches the final TWO PATTERNS consecutively. Only experience can give you this judgement. And its wise to become MORE SELECTIVE about when to bet especially when you want to roll up a 15+ winning streak. MV5 is more of an auto pilot method.

PATTERN BREAKER in its ULTIMATE FORM. Is more of a manually controlled method. All my success with this method has come from learning randoms common behaviour with that final pattern.

[Mike]

What I know from my experience with this game is virtually ALL loses occur the wrong side of 45 spins.

In that case then why not reverse the bet in those situations? That is, instead of betting AGAINST the pattern, bet FOR it. 

You can simulate playing a limited number of sessions per day by getting the computer to skip spins between sessions, there's no problem with that.

[Johnlegend]

In that case then why not reverse the bet in those situations? That is, instead of betting AGAINST the pattern, bet FOR it. 

You can simulate playing a limited number of sessions per day by getting the computer to skip spins between sessions, there's no problem with that.

That isnt a bad idea Mike. As it requires 7 wins to match a loss. I will look over my records for all games taking 45 or more spins to arrive at the final pattern. Maybe you tech guys could test it with your idea.

Might be grounds for a tweak, revision in the rules there, thanks.

[ZigZag]

14+2=16
16+2=18
18+2=20
20+2=22
22+2=24--ADD 4 up to level 2
28+4=32
32+4=36
36+4=40
40+4=44
44+4=48--ADD 8 up to level 3
56+8=64
64+8=72
72+8=80
80+8=88
88+8=96--ADD 16 up to level 4
112+16=128
128+16=144
144+16=160
160+16=176
176+16=192

Like it 

[jon86]

Like it 

Its brilliant

[joiner29]

could somebody please make it clear about the zero if it hits like say H0L do we disregard the three or just lose the zero and use the H and L sorry to be a nuisance but i just cannot get my head round the rules when the zero hits

[Proofreaders2000]

You assign the H0L (or any three cluster with a zero in it) to an unhit pattern (you choose) and give it a number.

[joiner29]

what is the reason it gets a number Im still unclear about this

[mr.ore]

To what pattern do you assign H0L? In my simulation I disregard those result, because in description he writes them down under the 8 patterns, so they are actually ignored.

[jon86]

To what pattern do you assign H0L? In my simulation I disregard those result, because in description he writes them down under the 8 patterns, so they are actually ignored.

That is the way to do it

[joiner29]

are all 3 are ignored

[maestro]

mr.ore thank you for your tracker, can you please tell me ho to get graphs working i went to site where is gnuplot download it but getting gnuplot.exe unable to locate component,also says failed to start because cyggcc_s-1.dll was not found..thank you ..i like the tracker did play 305 spins 15wins and 1 loss,120 spins 9 wins did not get losss...

[jon86]

Are all 3 are ignored

Yes. Ingnore. Just note them under the 8 patterns an give them the number  so dont mix up with other spins:)

[Rolletti]

Great concept. 

My thoughts about the randomness is just a little different.
Randomness has to follow its lows permanent without exeption.
If a system only works if you stop playing for some time until you continue, then the diference between winning and loosing is based on an individual factor: LUCK or BAD LUCK.
In fact if u go to the casino and record the numbers like:
2 17 28 6 13 . . .
and the system wins, then it also should win if u take one more second at the red traffic light and when arriving at the casino u record:
17 28 6 13 . . .

Conclusion is that you should be able to run the system permanently and start a new separate record with every number popping up on the roulette.  So u could run up to minimum 3 session at the same time and same roulette table.

Mr.  Legend u have real roulette numbers, maybe u can have a look at that.

I run the system on William Hill live playing Red/Black, Odd/Even, High/Low the same time.

22 win bets
2 lost bets

cheers. 

[jon86]

Great concept. 

My thoughts about the randomness is just a little different.
Randomness has to follow its lows permanent without exception.
If a system only works if you stop playing for some time until you continue, then the diference between winning and losing is based on an individual factor: LUCK or BAD LUCK.
In fact if you go to the casino and record the numbers like:
2 17 28 6 13 . . .
and the system wins, then it also should win if you take one more second at the red traffic light and when arriving at the casino you record:
17 28 6 13 . . .

Conclusion is that you should be able to run the system permanently and start a new separate record with every number popping up on the roulette.  So you could run up to minimum 3 session at the same time and same roulette table.

Mr.  Legend you have real roulette numbers, maybe you can have a look at that.

I run the system on William Hill live playing Red/Black, Odd/Even, High/Low the same time.

22 win bets
2 lost bets

cheers. 

A system that works the same way will never be beacuse the game change every spin and are never the same. But trapp the game and win a loot between the loss and if it dont lose in a row so often we can have a little control.

Jon