*PATTERN BREAKER*

[iggiv]

Yes, 35-1. But......You forgot one thing. Combinatorics. Have you seen often, for instance, 17-18-19 came out? I haven't. But every number there has odds of 35-1.

if u play frequently it happens. not every day of course, but it does. i found some sample from german casino where it happened like 1-2-3-4-5-6-6-7-8-9-12-11...something like that..it happens once in a blue moon, but things like 17-18-19 happen once in a while

[Ruprekht]

if u play frequently it happens. not every day of course, but it does. i found some sample from german casino where it happened like 1-2-3-4-5-6-6-7-8-9-12-11...something like that..it happens once in a blue moon, but things like 17-18-19 happen once in a while

I wouldn't mind if playing PATTERN BREAKER I lost once in a blue moon. In other words, what I wanted to say is: 17-18-19 happens far less frequently than 17-17-17. Although, every number has 35-1.
P.S. I dare say that such meanings as "play frequently", "once in a blue moon" or "once in a while" a little blurred.

[sarif]

can somoeone please answer my question

[iggiv]

I wouldn't mind if playing PATTERN BREAKER I lost once in a blue moon. In other words, what I wanted to say is: 17-18-19 happens far less frequently than 17-17-17. Although, every number has 35-1.
P.S. I dare say that such meanings as "play frequently", "once in a blue moon" or "once in a while" a little blurred.

i am not arguing, u may be right. as for meanings it is all relative, not "blurred".

[Johnlegend]

what is the correct way of playing this system win any of the even chances and reset or contnue playing can someone please clarify

You play two games a session Sarif ODDS AND EVENS and HIGH LOW simultaneously. Obviously you want to win them both and most of the time you will. Play no more than TWO GAMES PER SESSION THATS THE *****KEY******. Stay away from Red and Black. It performs less favourably to the aforementioned. I believe this has something to do with the layout.

[Johnlegend]

I wouldn't mind if playing PATTERN BREAKER I lost once in a blue moon. In other words, what I wanted to say is: 17-18-19 happens far less frequently than 17-17-17. Although, every number has 35-1.
P.S. I dare say that such meanings as "play frequently", "once in a blue moon" or "once in a while" a little blurred.

You stand correct Ruprekht. Knowing something is POSSIBLE. And running into it in real-time PLAY. Are two different things. People who side with the maths fraternity play on statistics too much. At the expense of TRUE PROGRESS. Random can decode any functional method. This all the wise ALREADY KNOW. The only question you need anwsered is can it do it often enough to kill your PROFIT MARGIN once you add the prime ingredients of money management and disciplined play to a solid method.

If the anwser is NO. You have a winning method....

[Johnlegend]

I'm not doing badly for a fool.


And how does BV get around the hash function again?

I couldnt tell you about BV Bayes. Its more than likley a smoke-screen to cover up what really goes on. As I said you are playing a man-made percentage machine similar to slots. 1 for you 3 for them. You can never fully trust manmade roulette that is the bottom line. And if you are trying to tell me a real wheel could cheat players yes it could. But who will it cheat. The player risking 100 units on a single number or the player risking 20 units on an even chance?? I have been in this game long enough to know what goes on Bayes. The smart players know how to stay under the radar picking off small but CONSISTENT (that's the key word) profits.

The greedy ones will be wiped out eventually ALWAYS.

[sarif]

thanks johnlegend for replying

[Bayes]

I couldnt tell you about BV Bayes. Its more than likley a smoke-screen to cover up what really goes on.

This just tells me you have no understanding of how hash functions work.

[woods101]

Hi Bayes,

Without going off-topic too much if the hash packets are in groups of 10 numbers at a time, if you are playing a system that becomes recognisable then would it not be a possibility that you could get sent a packet of 10 numbers (or successive packets) that would ruin you?
Basically why does the fact that you get sent 10 numbers at a time validate the honesty of BV?

Thanks
Woods

[Bayes]

Hi Woods,

Yes, it's possible that if BV has figured out your bet selection then they could do just that. But it would be simply luck on their part; there's a chance they could be completely wrong and in fact they might end up sending you winners! Just because you've played a certain way in the past doesn't mean you'll continue to play that way. And think of all the extra work this would involve for the casino (and with no guarantee of winning) - software would have to be written to monitor player's betting and then analyse data to find patterns (of which there are countless numbers), then they would have to write more software to generate the 'anti' pattern, but this would have to be not so obvious that players would get suspicious or that it would violate the laws of probability etc.. I just find the whole idea implausible.

In any case, playing any simple system spin after spin will mean that you eventually hit the sequence from hell, regardless of what the casino is sending you (assuming they can't generate numbers AFTER you bet).

[Bayes]

17-18-19 happens far less frequently than 17-17-17. Although, every number has 35-1.

Not so. 17-18-19 is just as likely as 17-17-17. All sequences of the same length are equally likely. Some patterns 'stand out' more clearly to our perception, but they hit equally as often. Don't take my word for it though, this is basic probability.

[Ruprekht]

Not so. 17-18-19 is just as likely as 17-17-17. All sequences of the same length are equally likely. Some patterns 'stand out' more clearly to our perception, but they hit equally as often. Don't take my word for it though, this is basic probability.

Disagree.

[Bayes]

Why?

[Ruprekht]

Why?

Because "basic probability" doesn't work in Roulette. You all don't take into consideration human factor.