*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Johnlegend]

Speaking of "pattern breakers", here's a good one that's been around for fifty years.

The wheel throws R R B B R B....

"Force" the wheel to hit those exact colors in the exact order. Use Marty 1 2 4 8 16 32...

Or use e/o big/little.......

Or combine them.  Just make the wheel repeat for six spins.  No waiting, no writing, no coding.

You can literally win dollars for hours on end.

No, it's not mine and, yes, it's re-hashed, but I didn't mention my wife!

Oops!!  I did....

TwoCat

Thats where everyone goes wrong Sam ***HOURS ON END*** Until that is realized nothing will ever change, and with human nature being what it is. Nothing will ever change.

[ego]

Speaking of "pattern breakers", here's a good one that's been around for fifty years.

The wheel throws R R B B R B....

"Force" the wheel to hit those exact colors in the exact order. Use Marty 1 2 4 8 16 32...

Or use e/o big/little.......

Or combine them.  Just make the wheel repeat for six spins.  No waiting, no writing, no coding.

You can literally win dollars for hours on end.

No, it's not mine and, yes, it's re-hashed, but I didn't mention my wife!

Oops!!  I did....

TwoCat

True that no other bet selection is better or produce better results.
You see RBB you play RBB is 1 in 8 or you see RBB and play BRR is 1 in 8.
Very solid selection and the spreed is up to you 3456789 and so on.

The one thing i don't understand and that all beginners do is rise the bet size to much.
1 1 1 2 2 3 do just fine as a start as you don't need to win every single bet.

[Johnlegend]

True that no other bet selection is better or produce better results.
You see RBB you play RBB is 1 in 8 or you see RBB and play BRR is 1 in 8.
Very solid selection and the spread is up to you 3456789 and so on.

The one thing i don't understand and that all beginners do is rise the bet size to much.
1 1 1 2 2 3 do just fine as a start as you don't need to win every single bet.

The mind is ALWAYS the weak link in the chain ego. If it werent this game would be done long ago. Humans are greedy this we know. If its gambling they think they are owed easy money. No need to work hard at it. There lies the fatal mistake. You must work hard very hard. Most simply arent up to the task. They want the gold without doing the digging.

[flukey luke]

The mind is ALWAYS the weak link in the chain ego. If it werent this game would be done long ago. Humans are greedy this we know. If its gambling they think they are owed easy money. No need to work hard at it. There lies the fatal mistake. You must work hard very hard. Most simply aren't up to the task. They want the gold without doing the digging.

One thing you can be assured about is that nobody will ever find a way to win consistently over the long haul by accident. Kind of reassuring from the casino's point of view anyhow.

[Johnlegend]

One thing you can be assured about is that nobody will ever find a way to win consistently over the long haul by accident. Kind of reassuring from the casino's point of view anyhow.

The ways to win are sitting all over this forum. The mindset to play them properly isnt Flukey. Thats the bottom line.

[Turner]

Ego, that the progression recommended in the kindle book i downloaded "real world blackjack" by john lucas.
He doesnt even recomend a double win as a 2 step in the first three 1-1-1. Double up does count as 2 in the 2-2-3-3 parts

Ive done just fine....£55 from 5 chips last week (Grosvenor land casino), £25 from £10 and £120 from £40 on William hill live dealer online.

[monaco]

Ego, that the progression recommended in the kindle book i downloaded "real world blackjack" by john lucas.
He doesn't even recomend a double win as a 2 step in the first three 1-1-1. Double up does count as 2 in the 2-2-3-3 parts

hi turnerfeck - not sure i get you here, do you mean 2 wins in the 1-1-1 means go to 2-3-3?


cheers

[GARNabby]

They want the gold without doing the digging.

The "digging" is almost always necessary for a success, but it is never sufficient.  That requires a knack or talent for where to dig how deep.

But there are some pretty-deep "holes" on sites like this.  Maybe they play roulette in China, i don't know.

[Johnlegend]

The "digging" is almost always necessary for a success, but it is never sufficient.  That requires a knack or talent for where to dig how deep.

But there are some pretty-deep "holes" on sites like this.  Maybe they play roulette in China, i don't know.

No Garnabby thats where you have lost the plot. The understanding that playing Hit and Run in its purest form SINGULAR GAMES is superior to stting there waiting for the inevitble loss. Is the first thing you must digest. Until then there is no starting point for longterm success in my experience. My CODE 4 first game results prove this to be true. only 6 times in more than 3,300 games. Have I landed on a losing game. You could never sit there for 3,300 games and only lose 6 of them. Bayes, Superman, Sam none of them could argue with that. But they still cannot see Hit and runs Value. Or more to the point dont want to. As once again its a slap in the face for all maths based thinking.

[TwoCatSam]

John

See my post at the other thread.  I'm always open-minded. 

Sam

[justanothergambler]

jhon, I appreciate your posts, but its not a slap of the face of math thinkers. you call it hit and run but you won because it just happen that you might entered the game during the winning streak.
Lets divide your game (turbo mode as example, You can applicate it to any mode) in Time-Space domain:
-Time domain: lets T1 T2 T3... Tn represent the time of n successive spins, in between there is a DELTA T = T(p)-T(p+q) where things goes wrong it might be at any length, you just sometime happend that you entred the game ( for 1 or 2 bets) just before Tp or after DELTA+ Tp. but sooner or later you would catch it. 
-Space domain: this another point which nobody here mentioned : the STARTING POINT, meaning this :
the marquee number were for example :
4   
10   
27
9
12
19
28
21
5

if you entred the game at number 4 : your code 4 would be
1A3C
1A3C
which is obviously a  losing starting point.
but if your starting point was next number which is 10  your code would be totaly different :
1c1c
2a2b
which is totaly a winning STRATING POINT.

[Johnlegend]

jhon, I appreciate your posts, but its not a slap of the face of math thinkers. you call it hit and run but you won because it just happen that you might entered the game during the winning streak.
Lets divide your game (turbo mode as example, You can applicate it to any mode) in Time-Space domain:
-Time domain: lets T1 T2 T3... Tn represent the time of n successive spins, in between there is a DELTA T = T(p)-T(p+q) where things goes wrong it might be at any length, you just sometime happend that you entred the game ( for 1 or 2 bets) just before Tp or after DELTA+ Tp. but sooner or later you would catch it. 
-Space domain: this another point which nobody here mentioned : the STARTING POINT, meaning this :
the marquee number were for example :
4   
10   
25
9
12
19
28
21
5

if you entred the game at number 4 : your code 4 would be
1A3C
1A3C
which is obviously a  losing starting point.
but if your starting point was next number which is 10  your code would be totaly different :
1c1c
2a2b
which is totaly a winning STRATING POINT.

Justanaothergambler, I know fully I am going to lose at some point. What I say to you and everyone else is its just going to be less than if I sat there for even 20 continous games each session. My results have shown me that the longer you leave the gate open the more overall losses you will collect. Bayes accuses me of contradicting myself. To the contrary. PERFECT TIMING BAYES is HIT AND RUN itself. that's what I've been saying all along. My results show that you are far less likely to land on a loss over a large sample of singular games. Than you will collect if you even played 20 game sessions.

And that's why its going to garner the faithful longterm success.

[justanothergambler]

agree jhon with you way of play! continuous will always catch up.
thats working then its true untill proven otherwise.
good luck mate

[superman]

PERFECT TIMING BAYES is HIT AND RUN itself

Do you mean luck?

It's been agreed that if you sit playing for too long you will hit a loss, we know this, but you still cannot tell everyone where this PERFECT TIMING is found/worked out, it's pure luck that you don't hit a loss the instant you sit down, so don't call it timing unless you can explain how you work out your timing, this is where all your "grails" fall down for everyone else, oops sorry, you did say theres 3 of you now with perfect timing.

[Johnlegend]

Do you mean luck?

It's been agreed that if you sit playing for too long you will hit a loss, we know this, but you still cannot tell everyone where this PERFECT TIMING is found/worked out, it's pure luck that you don't hit a loss the instant you sit down, so don't call it timing unless you can explain how you work out your timing, this is where all your "grails" fall down for everyone else, oops sorry, you did say theres 3 of you now with perfect timing.

Superman, maybe PERFECT TIMING is too strong a term. THE BEST TIMING. Would be more apt. Its simply the best way to offset profit destroying losses. That I've ever seen. They don't fall down Superman because they aren't being played properly by the majority. You are a prime example ever ready to knock me and HIT AND RUN. But you lack the conviction and staying power as do most to REALLY FIND OUT.

And its the ones who have the staying power. Who will show positive numbers. They might not always be as good as mine but positive numbers they will be.