*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Johnlegend]

Not Matrix Vertical of some sort?. Ok maybe i was wrong. I thought that in one of yr matrix systems u did not see more than 8 vertical reps?  Sorry my head is spinning already from all yr matrices 

Yes I tried a method called Matrix vertical 8. It wasn't as good as I had hoped. What I propose is a different ball game. Its using the alternating dozens and columns. And I think it will work a lot better, Because in all my test results. Its rare to even see three consecutive triples in a row. And out of all this testing. I think this will become the strongest of them all.

When something fails I say so. When it works I also say so. CODE 4 REVERSE. Isnt performing as I had hoped. But its still in positive numbers. A winner is a winner. But you all want grails that's where it goes wrong.

And I have been testing this on RNG in play mode albeit. And its working as good as live. So this could be a very special one.

[Robeenhuut]

Yes I tried a method called Matrix vertical 8. It wasn't as good as I had hoped. What I propose is a different ball game. Its using the alternating dozens and columns. And I think it will work a lot better, Because in all my test results. Its rare to even see three consecutive triples in a row. And out of all this testing. I think this will become the strongest of them all.

When something fails I say so. When it works I also say so. CODE 4 REVERSE. Isnt performing as I had hoped. But its still in positive numbers. A winner is a winner. But you all want grails that's where it goes wrong.

Like always u exaggerate a bit John. U can accuse me of lots of things like being a math guy but i can take a profit in a grinding way 2 n we both know that a chance of getting HG on a platter here is as big as getting 37 unique # in 37 spins 

[Johnlegend]

Like always u exaggerate a bit John. You can accuse me of lots of things like being a math guy but i can take a profit in a grinding way 2 n we both know that a chance of getting method on a platter here is as big as getting 37 unique # in 37 spins 

I will agree with you 37 numbers in 37 spins is never going to happen. But Exaggerate. I am not sure I am here. If I cant find one loss in over 250 potential games. At a risk of 8---26 units a game dependng on where you want to start. I think its worth a look. I will certainly give it, its due. As the alternating format might have found its ultimate use.

[atlantis]

Getting ready to get out my matrix sunglasses again!           

A.

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR PATTERN BREAKER FOR 29/06/2012

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 4,000

TOTAL GAMES WON 3,675

TOTAL GAMES LOST 325

STRIKERATE APPROX 11/1

BALANCE 4369 UNITS PLUS

DOUBLE LOSSES 3

A poorer performance over the last 400 game sample. Bringing the overall strikerate down a notch to 11/1. But what separates this method from many is the uncanny stability of two game play. With now only 3 double losses in 4,000 games. Its a powerpoint that will rarely be rivalled. Recently also I have begun playing all three even chances together for increased turnover. Over the last 120 games.

And among those three games in a session there has never been more than one loss. In the words of Meatloaf "Two Out Of Three Aint Bad" indeed. My attention has further turned to the closedown of PATTERN 8. It holds another extraordinary value of winning consistency. If you have to WAIT TO WIN. Pattern Breaker shows that wait is truly worthwhile.

[donik7777]

Can you explain about pattern 8?
For win can wait whole day than play whole day and lost.
Thanks.

[Johnlegend]

Can you explain about pattern 8?
For win can wait whole day than play whole day and lost.
Thanks.

Hello Donik7777 Pattern 8 is about betting on its completion. Its innevitable. But it can come anytime from immediately after Pattern 7 which means a losing game for PATTERN BREAKER. Or 20 plus cycles later. Now that im covering all three even chances. I have been scrutinizing its breakdown. And over the last 120 games here are the results.

COMPLETED IN 1=57
COMPLETED IN 2=35
COMPLETED IN 3=22
COMPLETED IN 4=3
COMPLETED IN 5=2
COMPLETED IN 6=1

Thats a strikerate of 19/1 over that 120 sample. Which is stronger than the 11/1

[Johnlegend]

Hello Donik7777 Pattern 8 is about betting on its completion. Its innevitable. But it can come anytime from immediately after Pattern 7 which means a losing game for PATTERN BREAKER. Or 20 plus cycles later. Now that I'm covering all three even chances. I have been scrutinizing its breakdown. And over the last 120 games here are the results.

COMPLETED IN 1=57
COMPLETED IN 2=35
COMPLETED IN 3=22
COMPLETED IN 4=3
COMPLETED IN 5=2
COMPLETED IN 6=1

that's a strikerate of 19/1 over that 120 sample. Which is stronger than the 11/1

So the idea Donik7777 is to cover 1---3 attempts using the classic 1,2,4 progression. Here is an example of a trigger for the first attempt.

PATTERN 8 IS HLH

LLL
HHL
HL------TRIGGER for attempt one to complete the 8th pattern

With a strikerate currently of 19/1 its well worth the wait. I would be happy with 10/1---12/1 as the original PATTERN BREAKER delivers. Its all worth it in the end if positive numbers are your reward.

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

I've read through all the pages.

Just to be sure I'm playing this (basics) correct.

1.You write the eight patterns on the left like this:

HLL
LHL
LLH
LHH
HLH
HHL
LLL
HHH

2. Every three spins we put a number behind the pattern. So if the numbers 10, 25, 11 come in we have pattern LHL. If this are our first three spins, we write a 1 behind pattern LHL.

If zero comes in we write that pattern under the original patternlist.

3.Continue until one pattern is left.

4.Then we bet the opposite of that pattern, so for example if our pattern is LHL we bet HLH using progression 2-4-8.

5. If you lose, use progression 7-14-28 on the next two sessions.

Is this the right way? Or should I play it with the new tweak. Don't bet opposite but just the remaining pattern?

I'm very curious to this method. And would like to test it a couple of hundred times on slingshot/live dealer with pen and paper work.

John which other methods/topics do you recommend me to read that are similair to this method?

Thnx.

Regards,


Niek


ps: sorry for my bad english!

[albertojonas]

I've read through all the pages.

Just to be sure I'm playing this (basics) correct.

1.You write the eight patterns on the left like this:

HLL
LHL
LLH
LHH
HLH
HHL
LLL
HHH

2. Every three spins we put a number behind the pattern. So if the numbers 10, 25, 11 come in we have pattern LHL. If this are our first three spins, we write a 1 behind pattern LHL.

If zero comes in we write that pattern under the original patternlist.

3.Continue until one pattern is left.

4.Then we bet the opposite of that pattern, so for example if our pattern is LHL we bet HLH using progression 2-4-8.

5. If you lose, use progression 7-14-28 on the next two sessions.

Is this the right way? Or should I play it with the new tweak. Don't bet opposite but just the remaining pattern?

I'm very curious to this method. And would like to test it a couple of hundred times on slingshot/live dealer with pen and paper work.

John which other methods/topics do you recommend me to read that are similair to this method?

Thnx.

Regards,


Niek


ps: sorry for my bad English!

if you ignore colors you only get 4 patterns and everything will be smoother

XXX
XOX
XXO
XOO

cheers

[Johnlegend]

Hello Niek in the testing zone Atlantis has an excellent thread PATTERN TRACKER. Thats worth reading and getting into. The PATTERN BREAKER concept is one of patience. If I told you that you would nearly always win one out of every three bets you placed at even money. Would you be interested? Everyone should. Then I told you it might take two to three hours at a B n M CASINO to get that win. Now few are interested. If you can wait YOU WILL WIN.

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

if you ignore colors you only get 4 patterns and everything will be smoother

XXX
XOX
XXO
XOO

cheers

Sorry, don't get that.

[CocaVillaLaNoche]

Ok, thnx.

I'm going to read that.

Regards,


Niek

[Robeenhuut]

Hello Niek in the testing zone Atlantis has an excellent thread PATTERN TRACKER. that's worth reading and getting into. The PATTERN BREAKER concept is one of patience. If I told you that you would nearly always win one out of every three bets you placed at even money. Would you be interested? Everyone should. Then I told you it might take two to three hours at a B n M CASINO to get that win. Now few are interested. If you can wait YOU WILL WIN.

Nearly always win one out of three... 2 me it means nearly 1 unit out of 3 bets in 1,2,4 progression. Can u explain nearly in roulette terms please... I guess im not only d one confused by yr statement.

[Jeff]

I can confirm that this don't lose. If lose 1 session no problem recover fast 

Love it John 

I find it hard to believe this actually works. The only roulette I play is no zero roulette and it's as close to having more chances to win as it comes.