Profit Trickler

[mogul397]

Damn atlantis

That looks good

RG, since I always get into arguments with people about shitty workouts,
explanations, and examples, let me just flag this as an example of what
I am looking for and mean about showing results clearly and explaining them.
So people can understand.

If you look at my posts you'll notice it's really my only complaint. I don't care
WHAT anyone says as long as they explain it and I can understand it. And not
write in code.

(Hope I'm catching you when you're sober.  If you're not, you're certainly out of jail.
No computers or toys in that place).

BTW, looks like this post is a really old idea. But a good one.

[RouletteGhost]

RG, since I always get into arguments with people about shitty workouts,
explanations, and examples, let me just flag this as an example of what
I am looking for and mean about showing results clearly and explaining them.
So people can understand.

If you look at my posts you'll notice it's really my only complaint. I don't care
WHAT anyone says as long as they explain it and I can understand it. And not
write in code.

(Hope I'm catching you when you're sober.  If you're not, you're certainly out of jail.
No computers or toys in that place).

BTW, looks like this post is a really old idea. But a good one.

This is not about me mogul

Gonna keep it on topic for respect of atlantis

I like his posts im not doing that in this thread

[Tomla021]

Atlantis always writes out a system clearly and always gives an egzample that can be followed.... that by itself is hard to do (if you dont believe me try it: )).....Kudos to Atlantis for all of his clear work

[mogul397]

Atlantis always writes out a system clearly and always gives an egzample that can be followed.... that by itself is hard to do (if you dont believe me try it: )).....Kudos to Atlantis for all of his clear work

Amen!!!

[mogul397]

This is not about me mogul

Gonna keep it on topic for respect of atlantis

I like his posts im not doing that in this thread

At least we have a benchmark.

[RFMAXX]

Simple Tracker i use for yall.

[atlantis]

Mogul sparked my interest on this one... Might try it again - it's been a while - but the last 2 revisions posted above (flatbet and 1-1-2 repeat) don't seem too bad.
A.

[RouletteGhost]

I throughly enjoy Atlantis' posts

[mogul397]

Thanks Atlantis. And thanks for the response to my PM.

I was literally looking at post 57 as a slight improvement to the
reply 56 that you mentioned. Just wrote it down.

Like RG I also enjoy your posts, as I do RG's posts.  Always informative.

It's kind of like what I was saying about people who post great stuff and
are no longer here.  But you're here!!! Great.

But it always leaves me wondering why good ideas get dropped or
forgotten.

Thanks again.

[atlantis]

Mogul, I'm also gonna try a few with the last revision - Reply #57

Fingers crossed!

Thanks mogul and RG etc.. for your kind comments.

This is easy to track and play. You're not betting every spin. No high or spiralling progressions.

(But maybe could try "guetting" though?)

Anyhow, I'll have some fun with it today/tonight and report back.

The main thing is  - try and grab a few units then get out!!!

A.

[atlantis]

First real money session on Live Auto-Roulette Le Partage

+5.5 in 51 spins.  That is OK. No sweat - just played it as described with no deviation

There were three 0's occurred  - only one of which happened on a bet spin.
The 0 can always be an unwelcome hindrance or a pest; unless you cover it as insurance - I got half my stake back there - which is some consolation (but to avoid completely maybe play on NoZero Roulette or Baccarat?)

Since there are always regular bets on each new line recorded you don't get to wait for too long without a bet; so you don't get timed out or kicked off from the app like when I tried with some other 'waiting' systems - that is good!

This one I play also has acceptable stakes in the range £0.10 to £4000 for an EC bet - which is also nice.

A.

[atlantis]

2 more easy +5's.  46 spins and 31 spins.
Relaxed and easy play.
I really must thank mogul again for jogging my memory about this.   
I'm sticking with it for now - much as I like "Anti-Copycat Dozens" as a double dozen system - I'm always beset by the worrisome risk of losing an 80u 4-step progression!
None such fears or jeopardy with something like this.

A.

[RouletteGhost]

People tend to make a big deal about 1 3 9 27

I don't think it's a big deal at all

Especially if low limits like cents

Gambling is gambling. Play as you wish. Of course with money you can afford to lose

If I'm playing roulette I better be willing to risk 80 units

[RouletteGhost]

If it's $1 bets. What's 1 3 9 27

Peanuts


The doc brings this up a few times a week. But it's perspective

Who is it? What's their bankroll? What unit size are they using? These are questions people should ask before criticizing someone's progression play

[atlantis]

If it's $1 bets. What's 1 3 9 27

Peanuts


The doc brings this up a few times a week. But it's perspective

Who is it? What's their bankroll? What unit size are they using? These are questions people should ask before criticizing someone's progression play

Hi RG,

You're right - and I believe methods like A-CD are strong. A lot of the wins do come on the first step.

A.